* Small wording change + fix in example template code
* Added note about UserConsent not being in the admin
* Mostly spelling corrections and phrasing changes
* Moved template context explation from the settings to the templates page
* Changed wording
* Changed wording
Django 1.10 changed request.user.is_authenticated from a function to a
boolean and Django 2.0 dropped the backward compatibility. In order to
use django-oidc-provider with Django 2.0, AuthorizeView needs to handle
request.user.is_authenticated as a boolean.
* Add test to expose issue #197
* Strip 'login' from prompt before redirecting
This fixes#197. Otherwise the user would have to login once,
then is immediately logged out and prompted to login again.
* Only remove 'login' if present
* Don't append an empty prompt parameter
* Inline variable
The token endpoint handled the scope parameter incorrectly for all of
the three handled grant types:
1. For "authorization_code" grant type the scope parameter in the token
request should not be respected but the scope should be taken from
the authorization code. It was not totally ignored, but rather the
scope parameter of the token request was used for the generated ID
token. This had two consequences:
* Spec conforming implementations of authorization code flow
didn't get correct ID tokens, since they usually don't pass
scope parameter with the token request.
* It's possible to get a broader scope for the ID token than what
is authorized by the user in the original authorization code
request.
2. For "refresh_token" grant type the scope parameter in the token
request should only allow narrowing down the scope. It wasn't
narrowed, but rather the original auth code scope was used for the
access token and the passed in scope parameter was used for the ID
token (again allowing unauthorized scopes in the ID token).
3. For "password" grant type the scope parameter in the token request
should be respected. The problem with this was that it wasn't
properly splitted when passed to ID token creation.
Fixes#186
The ID token processing hook might want to add claims to the ID token
conditionally based on the scope parameter. Therefore it would be very
useful to provide the scope parameter to the processing hook.
The token endpoint handled the scope parameter incorrectly for all of
the three handled grant types:
1. For "authorization_code" grant type the scope parameter in the token
request should not be respected but the scope should be taken from
the authorization code. It was not totally ignored, but rather the
scope parameter of the token request was used for the generated ID
token. This had two consequences:
* Spec conforming implementations of authorization code flow
didn't get correct ID tokens, since they usually don't pass
scope parameter with the token request.
* It's possible to get a broader scope for the ID token than what
is authorized by the user in the original authorization code
request.
2. For "refresh_token" grant type the scope parameter in the token
request should only allow narrowing down the scope. It wasn't
narrowed, but rather the original auth code scope was used for the
access token and the passed in scope parameter was used for the ID
token (again allowing unauthorized scopes in the ID token).
3. For "password" grant type the scope parameter in the token request
should be respected. The problem with this was that it wasn't
properly splitted when passed to ID token creation.
Fixes#186
When using Implicit Flow, it should be OK to use the stored user consent
even if the client is public. The redirect uri checks should make sure
that the stored consent of another client cannot be misused to get a
consent to a site that is not related to the client.
It is also important to support this, since public clients using
Implicit Flow do not have a refresh token to update their access tokens,
so only way to keep their login session open is by issuing authorization
requests from an iframe with the "prompt=none" parameter (which does not
work without the previously stored consent). See the following links
for more info and examples on how to renew the access token with SPAs:
https://auth0.com/docs/api-auth/tutorials/silent-authentication#refresh-expired-tokenshttps://damienbod.com/2017/06/02/https://github.com/IdentityServer/IdentityServer3/issues/719#issuecomment-230145034
* Test redirect_uri construction
This was a test marked as TODO.
* Remove duplicate test
* Add tests to exactly match redirect URIs
* Redirect URIs must match exactly.
To quote from the specification at
http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-core-1_0.html#AuthRequest:
Redirection URI to which the response will be sent. This URI MUST
exactly match one of the Redirection URI values for the Client
pre-registered at the OpenID Provider, with the matching performed as
described in Section 6.2.1 of [RFC3986] (Simple String Comparison).
