The Dynamic Client Registration spec specifies multiple response_types
and grant_types per client
(https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-registration-1_0.html#ClientMetadata).
Since grant_types can be inferred from response_types we should be able
to support both without needing to store grant_types.
This also helps with oidc-client-js which expects a client that supports
both "id_token" and "id_token token".
* 'develop' of github.com:juanifioren/django-oidc-provider:
Update changelog.rst
include request in password grant authenticate call
Update setup.py
Update changelog.rst
Update changelog.rst
Adjust import order and method order in introspection tests
Replace resource with client in docs.
Update settings docs to add extra introspection setting
Update README.md
Update README.md
Remove the Resource model
Skip csrf protection on introspection endpoint
Add token introspection endpoint to satisfy https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7662
Test docs with tox.
Remove Django 1.7 for travis.
Drop support for Django 1.7.
Move extract_client_auth to oauth2 utils.
Remove duplicate link in docs.
Bump version v0.6.0.
Fix BaseCodeTokenModel and user attr.
Update README.md
Edit README and contribute doc.
Edit changelog.
Update changelog.rst
Add protected_resource_view test using client_credentials.
Fix docs.
Improve docs.
Client credentials implementation.
Move changelog into docs.
Update README.md
Update CHANGELOG.md
Fixed infinite callback loop in check-session iframe
Fix PEP8. New migration.
Update example project.
Fix PEP8.
Fix PEP8.
PEP8 errors and urls.
PEP8 models.
Fix contribute docs.
Fix tox for checking PEP8 all files.
Update README.md
Update README.md
Simplify test suit.
Update CHANGELOG.md
Bump version 0.5.3.
Update installation.rst
Update CHANGELOG.md
Fixed wrong Object in Template
Update project to support Django 2.0
Now passing along the token to create_id_token function.
Made token and token_refresh endpoint return requested claims.
Sphinx documentation fixes (#219)
Use request.user.is_authenticated as a bool with recent Django (#216)
Fixed client id retrieval when aud is a list of str. (#210)
Add owner field to Client (#211)
Update CHANGELOG
removed tab char
Add pep8 compliance and checker
Bump version
Update CHANGELOG.md
Preparing v0.5.2 (#201)
Fix Django 2.0 deprecation warnings (#185)
Fix infinite login loop if "prompt=login" (#198)
fixed typos
Bump version
Fix scope handling of token endpoint (#193)
Fixes#192
Use stored user consent for public clients too (#189)
Redirect URIs must match exactly. (#191)
Bug #187 prompt handling (#188)
Don't pin exact versions in install_requires.
An an example this can be used to help implement measures against brute
force attacks and to alert on or mitigate other untrusted authentication
attempts.
The token endpoint handled the scope parameter incorrectly for all of
the three handled grant types:
1. For "authorization_code" grant type the scope parameter in the token
request should not be respected but the scope should be taken from
the authorization code. It was not totally ignored, but rather the
scope parameter of the token request was used for the generated ID
token. This had two consequences:
* Spec conforming implementations of authorization code flow
didn't get correct ID tokens, since they usually don't pass
scope parameter with the token request.
* It's possible to get a broader scope for the ID token than what
is authorized by the user in the original authorization code
request.
2. For "refresh_token" grant type the scope parameter in the token
request should only allow narrowing down the scope. It wasn't
narrowed, but rather the original auth code scope was used for the
access token and the passed in scope parameter was used for the ID
token (again allowing unauthorized scopes in the ID token).
3. For "password" grant type the scope parameter in the token request
should be respected. The problem with this was that it wasn't
properly splitted when passed to ID token creation.
Fixes#186
The ID token processing hook might want to add claims to the ID token
conditionally based on the scope parameter. Therefore it would be very
useful to provide the scope parameter to the processing hook.
The token endpoint handled the scope parameter incorrectly for all of
the three handled grant types:
1. For "authorization_code" grant type the scope parameter in the token
request should not be respected but the scope should be taken from
the authorization code. It was not totally ignored, but rather the
scope parameter of the token request was used for the generated ID
token. This had two consequences:
* Spec conforming implementations of authorization code flow
didn't get correct ID tokens, since they usually don't pass
scope parameter with the token request.
* It's possible to get a broader scope for the ID token than what
is authorized by the user in the original authorization code
request.
2. For "refresh_token" grant type the scope parameter in the token
request should only allow narrowing down the scope. It wasn't
narrowed, but rather the original auth code scope was used for the
access token and the passed in scope parameter was used for the ID
token (again allowing unauthorized scopes in the ID token).
3. For "password" grant type the scope parameter in the token request
should be respected. The problem with this was that it wasn't
properly splitted when passed to ID token creation.
Fixes#186
Remove tests/app/settings.py in favor of settings in setup.py.
Change MANIFEST.in to include README.md (which exists) instead of README.rst (which does not exist).
Update .travis.yml to use tox instead of `python django_admin.py`, include Django v1.10 in the mix.
