The button pickers in the style panel pop in and out all the time as
different shapes are selected. This PR lifts the dark mode check up to
the style panel itself, rather than in each picker.
### Change Type
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Scope' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [ ] `dotcom` — Changes the tldraw.com web app
- [ ] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
- [ ] `vs code` — Changes to the vscode plugin
- [ ] `internal` — Does not affect user-facing stuff
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Type' label ❗️ -->
- [ ] `bugfix` — Bug fix
- [ ] `feature` — New feature
- [x] `improvement` — Improving existing features
- [ ] `chore` — Updating dependencies, other boring stuff
- [ ] `galaxy brain` — Architectural changes
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code
- [ ] `tools` — Changes to infrastructure, CI, internal scripts,
debugging tools, etc.
- [ ] `dunno` — I don't know
### Test Plan
1. Use the style panel
2. Change the them
Describe what your pull request does. If appropriate, add GIFs or images
showing the before and after.
### Change Type
- [x] `internal` — Does not affect user-facing stuff
This PR makes a few tiny improvements to the way that selection page
bounds and rotated page bounds are calculated.
For bounds, we bail once we find a different rotation among the selected
shapes. Previously, we grabbed all of the rotations first before
comparing them; we only need to grab rotations until we find a rotation
that's different from the first one.
For rotating page bounds, we only look at the corners of the calculated
bounds, and we mutate the resulting points after we transform them.
Previously, we looked at all vertices and make a copy of the points when
rotating them. The transform already creates the copy, so we can mutate
it; and while the bounds are usually calculated from the vertices, using
the corners gives us fewer points to transform.
### Change Type
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Scope' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [ ] `dotcom` — Changes the tldraw.com web app
- [ ] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
- [ ] `vs code` — Changes to the vscode plugin
- [ ] `internal` — Does not affect user-facing stuff
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Type' label ❗️ -->
- [ ] `bugfix` — Bug fix
- [ ] `feature` — New feature
- [x] `improvement` — Improving existing features
- [ ] `chore` — Updating dependencies, other boring stuff
- [ ] `galaxy brain` — Architectural changes
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code
- [ ] `tools` — Changes to infrastructure, CI, internal scripts,
debugging tools, etc.
- [ ] `dunno` — I don't know
### Release Notes
- SDK, slightly more performant selection bounds calculations.
See discussion on discord in development channel
### Change Type
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Scope' label ❗️ -->
- [ ] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [x] `dotcom` — Changes the tldraw.com web app
- [ ] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
- [ ] `vs code` — Changes to the vscode plugin
- [ ] `internal` — Does not affect user-facing stuff
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Type' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `bugfix` — Bug fix
- [ ] `feature` — New feature
- [ ] `improvement` — Improving existing features
- [ ] `chore` — Updating dependencies, other boring stuff
- [ ] `galaxy brain` — Architectural changes
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code
- [ ] `tools` — Changes to infrastructure, CI, internal scripts,
debugging tools, etc.
- [ ] `dunno` — I don't know
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
The canvas handles component was rendering every time any shape changed,
whether or not that shape had handles.
### Change Type
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Scope' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [ ] `dotcom` — Changes the tldraw.com web app
- [ ] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
- [ ] `vs code` — Changes to the vscode plugin
- [ ] `internal` — Does not affect user-facing stuff
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Type' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `bugfix` — Bug fix
- [ ] `feature` — New feature
- [ ] `improvement` — Improving existing features
- [ ] `chore` — Updating dependencies, other boring stuff
- [ ] `galaxy brain` — Architectural changes
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code
- [ ] `tools` — Changes to infrastructure, CI, internal scripts,
debugging tools, etc.
- [ ] `dunno` — I don't know
### Test Plan
1. Use a shape with handles.
2. Use a shape without handles.
### Release Notes
- SDK: Fixed a minor rendering issue related to handles.
This PR cleans up text measurement divs, which could pile up during HMR.
### Change Type
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Scope' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [ ] `dotcom` — Changes the tldraw.com web app
- [ ] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
- [ ] `vs code` — Changes to the vscode plugin
- [ ] `internal` — Does not affect user-facing stuff
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Type' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `bugfix` — Bug fix
- [ ] `feature` — New feature
- [ ] `improvement` — Improving existing features
- [ ] `chore` — Updating dependencies, other boring stuff
- [ ] `galaxy brain` — Architectural changes
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code
- [ ] `tools` — Changes to infrastructure, CI, internal scripts,
debugging tools, etc.
- [ ] `dunno` — I don't know
### Release Notes
- Fixed a bug that could cause multiple text measurement divs in
development mode.
Follow up to #3129
### Change Type
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Scope' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [x] `improvement` — Improving existing features
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
Follow up to #3153, after testing some more I found some issues to fix.
### Change Type
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Scope' label ❗️ -->
- [ ] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [ ] `dotcom` — Changes the tldraw.com web app
- [x] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
- [ ] `vs code` — Changes to the vscode plugin
- [ ] `internal` — Does not affect user-facing stuff
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Type' label ❗️ -->
- [ ] `bugfix` — Bug fix
- [ ] `feature` — New feature
- [ ] `improvement` — Improving existing features
- [ ] `chore` — Updating dependencies, other boring stuff
- [ ] `galaxy brain` — Architectural changes
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code
- [x] `tools` — Changes to infrastructure, CI, internal scripts,
debugging tools, etc.
- [ ] `dunno` — I don't know
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
This PR makes it so that our docs deployment process is tied to, and
mirrors, the npm deployment process.
From here on:
- Commits to main get deployed to staging.tldraw.dev
- Commits to a special protected branch called `docs-production` get
deployed to www.tldraw.dev
- Whenever we create a new npm 'latest' release we reset the HEAD of
docs-production to point to the tagged commit for that release.
- If we make a docs change that we want to appear on tldraw.dev ASAP
without waiting for the next npm release, we'll have to follow the same
process as for creating a patch release i.e merge a cherry-pick PR
targeting the latest release branch e.g. `v2.0.x`. This will not cause
another npm patch release unless the cherry-picked changes touch source
files, e.g. updating TSDoc comments.
### Change Type
- [x] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
- [x] `tools` — Changes to infrastructure, CI, internal scripts,
debugging tools, etc.
Apparently we were supposed to do this for the previous release, and the
release notes mentioned the document title, so I'm doing a quick hotfix
for dotcom.
### Change Type
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Scope' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `dotcom` — Changes the tldraw.com web app
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Type' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `feature` — New feature
Describe what your pull request does. If appropriate, add GIFs or images
showing the before and after.
### Change Type
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Scope' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Type' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `dunno` — I don't know
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [x] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
Installation docs has a link to example for exploded which points to
github 404. I have updated the working link.
We had a couple regressions in #3110: first a missing `await` was
causing fonts not to get properly embedded in exports. second, some
`readAsText` calls were replaced with `readAsDataURL` calls.
### Change Type
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Scope' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [ ] `dotcom` — Changes the tldraw.com web app
- [ ] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
- [ ] `vs code` — Changes to the vscode plugin
- [ ] `internal` — Does not affect user-facing stuff
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Type' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `bugfix` — Bug fix
- [ ] `feature` — New feature
- [ ] `improvement` — Improving existing features
- [ ] `chore` — Updating dependencies, other boring stuff
- [ ] `galaxy brain` — Architectural changes
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code
- [ ] `tools` — Changes to infrastructure, CI, internal scripts,
debugging tools, etc.
- [ ] `dunno` — I don't know
When we went from overrides-based to component based UI customisation
APIs, we didn't do the toolbar because it had some significant extra
complexity around overflowing the contents of the menu into the
dropdown. This is really hard to do at render-time with react - you
can't introspect what a component will return to move some of it into an
overflow.
Instead, this diff runs that logic in a `useLayoutEffect` - we render
all the items into both the main toolbar and the overflow menu, then in
the effect (or if the rendered components change) we use CSS to remove
the items we don't need, check which was last active, etc. Originally, I
wasn't really into this approach - but i've actually found it to work
super well and be very reliable.
### Change Type
- [x] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Test the toolbar at many different sizes with many different 'active
tools'
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
This PR switches up how PR labels are validated to allow for more
freeform label tweaking in the future. Basically **huppy will now only
check that your PR is labelled, it doesn't care how it's labelled**. I
also updated the PR template with a new labelling scheme that we can
tweak over time.
So before Huppy bot had to know about the specific set of allowed
labels, and now as long as the label exists you're allowed to add it.
So to add a new label to the PR template, just create the label and then
add an option for it in the .md file.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
Reverts the changes to the `state` package that were made in #2977.
Should fix the issue with shape jittering discovered during QA.
### Change Type
- [x] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Create some shapes (draw shapes work well).
2. Open the same room in a second browser.
3. Resize shapes (using option / alt makes it more obvious).
4. The shapes should not jitter in any of the screens.
following up on
https://discord.com/channels/859816885297741824/1162726738774720574/1211715924613275681
several things here:
- `docs/api/.*json` were out-of-date — seems like fetch-api-source
should run automatically? shouldn't `build-api` also override this
directory? in particular, tldraw.api.json still had a ton of references
to the old @tldraw/tldraw package
- the main problem was that `generateApiContent` was failing silently.
we were relying on Promises and this broke silently because we never
handled exceptions. i got rid of the Promise as it was unnecessary and
made the exceptions bubble up
- two things were broken in the docs and those are fixed, so now the
missing entries will resurface
### Change Type
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
Use the Readme and bg color of elements to make it clearer which menu is
being customised.
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
This PR:
- adds the export all menu items to the main menu
- removes the export all menu items from the dotcom menus
- removes the shape menu and reverts several changes from
https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/pull/2782. This was not properly
reviewed (I thought it was a PR about hiding / showing menu items).
- fixes a bug with exporting (exporting JSON was not working when the
user had no selected shapes)
- fixes a bug that would prevent "flip shapes" from appearing in the
menu
- prevents export / copy actions from running if there are no shapes on
the page
- allows export / copy actions to default to all shapes on the page if
no shapes are selected
These changes have not been released in the dotcom yet. There's will be
some thrash in the APIs.
# Menu philosophy
In the menu, the **edit** submenu relates to undo/redo, plus the user's
current selection.
Menu items that relate to specific to certain shapes are hidden when not
available.
Menu items that relate to all shapes are disabled when not available.
<img width="640" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/assets/23072548/e467e6bb-d958-4a9a-ac19-1dada52dcfa6">
### Change Type
- [x] `major` — Bug fix
### Test
- Select no shapes (arrange / flip should not be visible)
- Select one geo shape (arrange / flip should not be visible)
- Select two geo shapes (arrange / flip should be visible)
- Select one draw shape (arrange / flip should not be visible)
### Release Notes
- Revert some changes in the menu.
Per #3018, the `import` causes `scripts/refresh-assets.ts` to fail on
Windows. This PR applies @SomeHats's suggestions cleanly on top of the
current `main`. Thank you @cscxj for the original report!
Describe what your pull request does. If appropriate, add GIFs or images
showing the before and after.
### Change Type
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package
Before this PR all .md files were targeted by the `.ignore` file, which
has bitten me on a number of occasions since .md files often contain
valuable information (e.g. the vscode extensions docs). This PR
unignores .md files while still ignoring _generated_ .md files like our
changelogs, the api-report files, and the generated docs sections.
Additionally, the `yarn format` and `yarn lint` commands were configured
slightly differently, which was confusing, so I've unified those and
simplified the lint.ts script at the same time.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
There is very little point sending data messages more often than 60
times a second, so we buffer them before sending.
### Change Type
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package
### Test Plan
1. Smoke test (on a retro?)
- [x] End to end tests
---------
Co-authored-by: David Sheldrick <d.j.sheldrick@gmail.com>
This PR does a few things to help with performance:
1. Instead of doing changes on raf we now do them 60 times per second.
This limits the number of updates on high refresh rate screens like the
iPad. With the current code this only applied to the history updates (so
when you subscribed to the updates), but the next point takes this a bit
futher.
2. We now trigger react updates 60 times per second. This is a change in
`useValue` and `useStateTracking` hooks.
3. We now throttle the inputs (like the `pointerMove`) in state nodes.
This means we batch multiple inputs and only apply them at most 60 times
per second.
We had to adjust our own tests to pass after this change so I marked
this as major as it might require the users of the library to do the
same.
Few observations:
- The browser calls the raf callbacks when it can. If it gets
overwhelmed it will call them further and further apart. As things call
down it will start calling them more frequently again. You can clearly
see this in the drawing example. When fps gets to a certain level we
start to get fewer updates, then fps can recover a bit. This makes the
experience quite janky. The updates can be kinda ok one second (dropping
frames, but consistently) and then they can completely stop and you have
to let go of the mouse to make them happen again. With the new logic it
seems everything is a lot more consistent.
- We might look into variable refresh rates to prevent this overtaxing
of the browser. Like when we see that the times between our updates are
getting higher we could make the updates less frequent. If we then see
that they are happening more often we could ramp them back up. I had an
[experiment for this
here](4834863966 (diff-318e71563d7c47173f89ec084ca44417cf70fc72faac85b96f48b856a8aec466L30-L35)).
Few tests below. Used 6x slowdown for these.
# Resizing
### Before
https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/assets/2523721/798a033f-5dfa-419e-9a2d-fd8908272ba0
### After
https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/assets/2523721/45870a0c-c310-4be0-b63c-6c92c20ca037
# Drawing
Comparison is not 100% fair, we don't store the intermediate inputs
right now. That said, tick should still only produce once update so I do
think we can get a sense of the differences.
### Before
https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/assets/2523721/2e8ac8c5-bbdf-484b-bb0c-70c967f4541c
### After
https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/assets/2523721/8f54b7a8-9a0e-4a39-b168-482caceb0149
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [x] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Release Notes
- Improves the performance of rendering.
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
Need to make sure we have access to the `main` branch so we can
calculate how many commits the branch has diverged by.
### Change Type
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
This PR fixes a bug where local rotation was used in cropping handles
rather than absolute rotation.
### Change Type
- [x] `patch` — Bug fix
### Test Plan
1. Crop an image
2. Place the image into a rotated parent
3. Crop the image
4. Rotate the image
5. Crop the image
The handles should be accurately rotated in all cases.
### Release Notes
- Fixed a bug that could cause rotated cropping images to have
incorrectly rotated handles.
Describe what your pull request does. If appropriate, add GIFs or images
showing the before and after.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Fix typo in useValue comment.
Adds an example of how to add migrations for a custom shape.
closes tld-2246
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
### Release Notes
- Adds a shape with migrations example
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
This PR adds tooling to enable a PR-based workflow for publishing
'patch' releases.
### How releases currently work
Quick recap of how the 'major' and 'minor' releases work:
- You trigger them manually in the github actions UI
- It only works on the `main` branch.
- You select a mode: `'major'`, `'minor'`, or `'override'` with a
specific version. The override option is mainly for transitioning in and
out of prerelease mode, but potentially also skipping unlucky numbers
like 13 if you're feeling superstitious 🧙🏼
- It bumps the version numbers in the `package.json` and `version.ts`
files.
- It compiles a changelog based on descriptions/titles from all the PRs
that have gone in to `main`.
- It tags the commit with the version number e.g. `v2.0.0` and pushes
all the changes made to `main` (i.e. changelogs, version bumps and the
tag)
- It creates a github release, e.g.
https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/releases/tag/v2.0.0
- It deploys the packages to npm
- It tells huppy bot about the release (for now-defunct purposes, we can
remove that code later)
- It triggers the template repo update workflow
### Introducing: Release Branches
This PR adds one step into the above process: creating a 'release'
branch. e.g. if it publishes a new version tagged `v2.1.0` it will also
create a branch named `v2.1.x`.
These branches are protected in the following ways:
- Only huppy bot can create or delete them (ad-hoc admin overrides are,
of course, still doable should the need arise)
- Like `main` they can only be updated via pull request.
The process to create a patch release becomes simple:
1. Checkout the `v<major>.<minor>.x` branch you want to create a patch
release for. e.g.
git fetch && git checkout v2.1.x
4. Branch off, e.g.
git checkout -b david/my-patch-release
6. Cherry-pick any commits you need from `main` into your branch,
resolving any conflicts if they arise. **important**: don't do new work
here because it won't be merged back into `main` automatically. Fix the
thing in `main` first and then cherry-pick, unless you're in a big rush
or whatever. e.g.
git cherry-pick abdeaf234 cde234d09 ab23af287
7. Push your new branch to github as normal and make a PR targeting the
`v<major>.<minor>.x` branch.
8. Merge it.
Congratulations, you just triggered a patch release build.
### What happens (differently) during a patch release build.
⚡ A key thing to understand here is that **this script allows us to
deploy patch versions of _older_ major/minor releases**. This will
happen when we have customers pinned to older versions and they need a
quick bugfix but don't have time to upgrade to the latest due to some
breaking change. This will also happen if we ever adopt a kind of 'LTS'
release model.
With that said, here's how things go down differently:
- Firstly, the build happens automatically after the PR is merged, and
you don't select 'major' or 'minor' or anything, it just does its thing.
- It bumps the version numbers in the `package.json` files and the
`version.ts` files but these changes stay within the release branch,
they don't get propagated to `main` (nor should they).
- It compiles a changelog entry featuring just your one PR's
description/title, and also pushes this to the release branch (but not
`main`).
- It still tags the commit and creates a github release as normal.
- It still deploys the packages to npm (obvs). HOWEVER it only uses the
`latest` tag if this will indeed be the latest version of the public
packages. Otherwise, if we're patching an older release, it uses the
`revision` tag. Unfortunately it doesn't seem to be an option to deploy
with _no_ tag, but using `revision` still allows version strings like
`~2.0.0` to capture subsequent patch releases like `2.0.3`.
- Similarly it _only_ notifies huppy bot and _only_ triggers the
template repo update if the version being deployed is actually the
latest version.
I'm going to merge this now to test it out but I'd still appreciate
reviews.
Adds tests for the Vec.Average. [My previous
PR](https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/pull/3065) added a check that
prevented returning vectors with NaNs, this adds a test for that.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [x] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
Describe what your pull request does. If appropriate, add GIFs or images
showing the before and after.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
Look at the revised documentation
### Release Notes
N/A
Two examples:
One in the UI section that shows how to add a tool to the toolbar along
with an icon
One in the shapes and tools section that shows a simple sticker tool
with no child states
I'll go over the copy again before it's merged, but don't want to spend
too long on it right now in case the feeling is that these should both
be a single example.
Next: The [minimal
example](https://tldraw.dev/examples/editor-api/only-editor) is
currently the best example we have of a tool with child states. I think
this should be adapted and copied/moved over to the custom shapes and
tools category.
closes tld-2266
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
### Release Notes
- Adds a simple custom tool example
Should fix `At instance.duplicateProps.offset.x: Expected a number, got
NaN` validation errors.
Wasn't able to reproduce. We only assign the offset here, so
`Vec.Averge` is the most likely offender here and for that to happen I
guess `movingShapes` might not contain any shapes.
### Change Type
- [x] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
This is a generated file that shouldn't be checked in.
### Change Type
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
Right now it's fairly easy to encounter a situation when a tab coming
online wouldn't recognise that the connection can now be reestablished
for a while. This PR cleans up reconnection logic, reenables tests, and
makes sure we get online as robustly as possible.
### Change Type
- [x] `patch` — Bug fix
### Test Plan
1. Check that reconnection works as expected
- [x] End to end tests
---------
Co-authored-by: David Sheldrick <d.j.sheldrick@gmail.com>
This PR shortens the URL parameters for the dot com. Old formal still
works but this is shorter (it has bugged me for ages).
Before:
tldraw.com/r/ok?viewport=0,0,1080,720&page=page:ashdsad_sadsadasd
After:
tldraw.com/r/ok?v=0,0,1080,720&p=ashdsad_sadsadasd
### Change Type
- [x] `internal`
### Test Plan
1. Try the old url parameter format.
2. Try the new one.
### Release Notes
- Shortens url parameters for dot com.
Fixed an issue where the video size was drawing larger than the shape
size.
After:
Before:
### Change Type
- [x] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
no tests
### Release Notes
- Fix an issue where the video size was not drawn correctly.
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
