Currently, we only use native `structuredClone` in the browser, falling
back to `JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(...))` elsewhere, despite Node
supporting `structuredClone` [since
v17](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/structuredClone)
and Cloudflare Workers supporting it [since
2022](https://blog.cloudflare.com/standards-compliant-workers-api/).
This PR adjusts our shim to use the native `structuredClone` on all
platforms, if available.
Additionally, `jsdom` doesn't implement `structuredClone`, a bug [open
since 2022](https://github.com/jsdom/jsdom/issues/3363). This PR patches
`jsdom` environment in all packages/apps that use it for tests.
Also includes a driveby removal of `deepCopy`, a function that is
strictly inferior to `structuredClone`.
### Change Type
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Scope' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [x] `dotcom` — Changes the tldraw.com web app
- [ ] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
- [ ] `vs code` — Changes to the vscode plugin
- [ ] `internal` — Does not affect user-facing stuff
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Type' label ❗️ -->
- [ ] `bugfix` — Bug fix
- [ ] `feature` — New feature
- [x] `improvement` — Improving existing features
- [x] `chore` — Updating dependencies, other boring stuff
- [ ] `galaxy brain` — Architectural changes
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code
- [ ] `tools` — Changes to infrastructure, CI, internal scripts,
debugging tools, etc.
- [ ] `dunno` — I don't know
### Test Plan
1. A smoke test would be enough
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [x] End to end tests
- always refresh docs content when building on CI
- use local api.json files now since we don't want to use SOURCE_SHA
- @steveruizok it feels kinda problematic that we check in a bunch of
derived files that the docs build requires. Things can get out of sync
easily, and whose responsibility is it to update them? In the future I
reckon we should explore ways to remove these files from the git index
as much as possible.
closes#3200
### Change Type
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Scope' label ❗️ -->
- [ ] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [ ] `dotcom` — Changes the tldraw.com web app
- [x] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
- [ ] `vs code` — Changes to the vscode plugin
- [ ] `internal` — Does not affect user-facing stuff
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Type' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `bugfix` — Bug fix
- [ ] `feature` — New feature
- [ ] `improvement` — Improving existing features
- [ ] `chore` — Updating dependencies, other boring stuff
- [ ] `galaxy brain` — Architectural changes
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code
- [ ] `tools` — Changes to infrastructure, CI, internal scripts,
debugging tools, etc.
- [ ] `dunno` — I don't know
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
Follow up to #3153, after testing some more I found some issues to fix.
### Change Type
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Scope' label ❗️ -->
- [ ] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [ ] `dotcom` — Changes the tldraw.com web app
- [x] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
- [ ] `vs code` — Changes to the vscode plugin
- [ ] `internal` — Does not affect user-facing stuff
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Type' label ❗️ -->
- [ ] `bugfix` — Bug fix
- [ ] `feature` — New feature
- [ ] `improvement` — Improving existing features
- [ ] `chore` — Updating dependencies, other boring stuff
- [ ] `galaxy brain` — Architectural changes
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code
- [x] `tools` — Changes to infrastructure, CI, internal scripts,
debugging tools, etc.
- [ ] `dunno` — I don't know
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
This PR makes it so that our docs deployment process is tied to, and
mirrors, the npm deployment process.
From here on:
- Commits to main get deployed to staging.tldraw.dev
- Commits to a special protected branch called `docs-production` get
deployed to www.tldraw.dev
- Whenever we create a new npm 'latest' release we reset the HEAD of
docs-production to point to the tagged commit for that release.
- If we make a docs change that we want to appear on tldraw.dev ASAP
without waiting for the next npm release, we'll have to follow the same
process as for creating a patch release i.e merge a cherry-pick PR
targeting the latest release branch e.g. `v2.0.x`. This will not cause
another npm patch release unless the cherry-picked changes touch source
files, e.g. updating TSDoc comments.
### Change Type
- [x] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
- [x] `tools` — Changes to infrastructure, CI, internal scripts,
debugging tools, etc.
This PR switches up how PR labels are validated to allow for more
freeform label tweaking in the future. Basically **huppy will now only
check that your PR is labelled, it doesn't care how it's labelled**. I
also updated the PR template with a new labelling scheme that we can
tweak over time.
So before Huppy bot had to know about the specific set of allowed
labels, and now as long as the label exists you're allowed to add it.
So to add a new label to the PR template, just create the label and then
add an option for it in the .md file.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
Per #3018, the `import` causes `scripts/refresh-assets.ts` to fail on
Windows. This PR applies @SomeHats's suggestions cleanly on top of the
current `main`. Thank you @cscxj for the original report!
Describe what your pull request does. If appropriate, add GIFs or images
showing the before and after.
### Change Type
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package
Before this PR all .md files were targeted by the `.ignore` file, which
has bitten me on a number of occasions since .md files often contain
valuable information (e.g. the vscode extensions docs). This PR
unignores .md files while still ignoring _generated_ .md files like our
changelogs, the api-report files, and the generated docs sections.
Additionally, the `yarn format` and `yarn lint` commands were configured
slightly differently, which was confusing, so I've unified those and
simplified the lint.ts script at the same time.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
Need to make sure we have access to the `main` branch so we can
calculate how many commits the branch has diverged by.
### Change Type
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
This PR adds tooling to enable a PR-based workflow for publishing
'patch' releases.
### How releases currently work
Quick recap of how the 'major' and 'minor' releases work:
- You trigger them manually in the github actions UI
- It only works on the `main` branch.
- You select a mode: `'major'`, `'minor'`, or `'override'` with a
specific version. The override option is mainly for transitioning in and
out of prerelease mode, but potentially also skipping unlucky numbers
like 13 if you're feeling superstitious 🧙🏼
- It bumps the version numbers in the `package.json` and `version.ts`
files.
- It compiles a changelog based on descriptions/titles from all the PRs
that have gone in to `main`.
- It tags the commit with the version number e.g. `v2.0.0` and pushes
all the changes made to `main` (i.e. changelogs, version bumps and the
tag)
- It creates a github release, e.g.
https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/releases/tag/v2.0.0
- It deploys the packages to npm
- It tells huppy bot about the release (for now-defunct purposes, we can
remove that code later)
- It triggers the template repo update workflow
### Introducing: Release Branches
This PR adds one step into the above process: creating a 'release'
branch. e.g. if it publishes a new version tagged `v2.1.0` it will also
create a branch named `v2.1.x`.
These branches are protected in the following ways:
- Only huppy bot can create or delete them (ad-hoc admin overrides are,
of course, still doable should the need arise)
- Like `main` they can only be updated via pull request.
The process to create a patch release becomes simple:
1. Checkout the `v<major>.<minor>.x` branch you want to create a patch
release for. e.g.
git fetch && git checkout v2.1.x
4. Branch off, e.g.
git checkout -b david/my-patch-release
6. Cherry-pick any commits you need from `main` into your branch,
resolving any conflicts if they arise. **important**: don't do new work
here because it won't be merged back into `main` automatically. Fix the
thing in `main` first and then cherry-pick, unless you're in a big rush
or whatever. e.g.
git cherry-pick abdeaf234 cde234d09 ab23af287
7. Push your new branch to github as normal and make a PR targeting the
`v<major>.<minor>.x` branch.
8. Merge it.
Congratulations, you just triggered a patch release build.
### What happens (differently) during a patch release build.
⚡ A key thing to understand here is that **this script allows us to
deploy patch versions of _older_ major/minor releases**. This will
happen when we have customers pinned to older versions and they need a
quick bugfix but don't have time to upgrade to the latest due to some
breaking change. This will also happen if we ever adopt a kind of 'LTS'
release model.
With that said, here's how things go down differently:
- Firstly, the build happens automatically after the PR is merged, and
you don't select 'major' or 'minor' or anything, it just does its thing.
- It bumps the version numbers in the `package.json` files and the
`version.ts` files but these changes stay within the release branch,
they don't get propagated to `main` (nor should they).
- It compiles a changelog entry featuring just your one PR's
description/title, and also pushes this to the release branch (but not
`main`).
- It still tags the commit and creates a github release as normal.
- It still deploys the packages to npm (obvs). HOWEVER it only uses the
`latest` tag if this will indeed be the latest version of the public
packages. Otherwise, if we're patching an older release, it uses the
`revision` tag. Unfortunately it doesn't seem to be an option to deploy
with _no_ tag, but using `revision` still allows version strings like
`~2.0.0` to capture subsequent patch releases like `2.0.3`.
- Similarly it _only_ notifies huppy bot and _only_ triggers the
template repo update if the version being deployed is actually the
latest version.
I'm going to merge this now to test it out but I'd still appreciate
reviews.
Some of the tooling changes we made last week made it so that canary
releases were being published with the `latest` dist tag. This should
prevent that from happening, and I also fixed all the current packages
to set `latest` back to 2.0.0
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
follow up to #3009
the versions.ts files were not being updated since things had been added
and moved around
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
follow up to #3008
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
Follow up to #3006
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
follow up to #2998
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
Rename `@tldraw/tldraw` to just `tldraw`! `@tldraw/tldraw` still exists
as an alias to `tldraw` for folks who are still using that.
### Test Plan
- [x] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- The `@tldraw/tldraw` package has been renamed to `tldraw`. You can
keep using the old version if you want though!
Gonna merge in a sneaky dry run mode to test the args parsing etc
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
This PR fixes a check on whether the dot com multiplayer editor has been
loaded in an iframe.
It tries to keep it working on tldraw.com itself.
### Change Type
- [x] `patch` — Bug fix
### Test Plan
1. Load me in an iframe
This PR bumps TypeScript to 5.3.3 and API extractor. We started getting
some weird behavior in CI due to different versions of the two
libraries, ie where the CI api.jsons would differ from those built
locally.
### Change Type
- [x] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
Closes#2800
This PR makes it so that `check-scripts` will error out if you forget to
add a "references" entry to a tsconfig file when adding an internal
dependency in our monorepo.
If these project references are missed it can prevent TS from
building/rebuilding things when they need to be built/rebuilt.
### Change Type
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
1. language.ts will be changed in every commit when commiting with a
'zh-cn' OS language setting. Fix it by specifying the locale 'en' when
sorting languages with localeCompare().
2. The parameter of glob.sync() must in posix path form. In Win32 system
the path separator '\\' considered as a escape char by node-glob, Fix it
by replace '\\' with '/'.
3. build-api with child_process.execFile() will cause "Error: spawn yarn
ENOENT" in Win32. Replace it with child_process.exec().
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Release Notes
- stablize language.ts when running under different OS language.
- add isWin32() and posixPath() to format the parameter of glob.sync().
- use child_process.exec() instead of child_process.execFile() for win32
platform.
This PR refactors our menu systems and provides an interface to hide or
replace individual user interface elements.
# Background
Previously, we've had two types of overrides:
- "schema" overrides that would allow insertion or replacement of items
in the different menus
- "component" overrides that would replace components in the editor's
user interface
This PR is an attempt to unify the two and to provide for additional
cases where the "schema-based" user interface had begun to break down.
# Approach
This PR makes no attempt to change the `actions` or `tools`
overrides—the current system seems to be correct for those because they
are not reactive. The challenge with the other ui schemas is that they
_are_ reactive, and thus the overrides both need to a) be fed in from
outside of the editor as props, and b) react to changes from the editor,
which is an impossible situation.
The new approach is to use React to declare menu items. (Surprise!)
```tsx
function CustomHelpMenuContent() {
return (
<>
<DefaultHelpMenuContent />
<TldrawUiMenuGroup id="custom stuff">
<TldrawUiMenuItem
id="about"
label="Like my posts"
icon="external-link"
readonlyOk
onSelect={() => {
window.open('https://x.com/tldraw', '_blank')
}}
/>
</TldrawUiMenuGroup>
</>
)
}
const components: TLComponents = {
HelpMenuContent: CustomHelpMenuContent,
}
export default function CustomHelpMenuContentExample() {
return (
<div className="tldraw__editor">
<Tldraw components={components} />
</div>
)
}
```
We use a `components` prop with the combined editor and ui components.
- [ ] Create a "layout" component?
- [ ] Make UI components more isolated? If possible, they shouldn't
depend on styles outside of themselves, so that they can be used in
other layouts. Maybe we wait on this because I'm feeling a slippery
slope toward presumptions about configurability.
- [ ] OTOH maybe we go hard and consider these things as separate
components, even packages, with their own interfaces for customizability
/ configurability, just go all the way with it, and see what that looks
like.
# Pros
Top line: you can customize tldraw's user interface in a MUCH more
granular / powerful way than before.
It solves a case where menu items could not be made stateful from
outside of the editor context, and provides the option to do things in
the menus that we couldn't allow previously with the "schema-based"
approach.
It also may (who knows) be more performant because we can locate the
state inside of the components for individual buttons and groups,
instead of all at the top level above the "schema". Because items /
groups decide their own state, we don't have to have big checks on how
many items are selected, or whether we have a flippable state. Items and
groups themselves are allowed to re-build as part of the regular React
lifecycle. Menus aren't constantly being rebuilt, if that were ever an
issue.
Menu items can be shared between different menu types. We'll are
sometimes able to re-use items between, for example, the menu and the
context menu and the actions menu.
Our overrides no longer mutate anything, so there's less weird searching
and finding.
# Cons
This approach can make customization menu contents significantly more
complex, as an end user would need to re-declare most of a menu in order
to make any change to it. Luckily a user can add things to the top or
bottom of the context menu fairly easily. (And who knows, folks may
actually want to do deep customization, and this allows for it.)
It's more code. We are shipping more react components, basically one for
each menu item / group.
Currently this PR does not export the subcomponents, i.e. menu items. If
we do want to export these, then heaven help us, it's going to be a
_lot_ of exports.
# Progress
- [x] Context menu
- [x] Main menu
- [x] Zoom menu
- [x] Help menu
- [x] Actions menu
- [x] Keyboard shortcuts menu
- [x] Quick actions in main menu? (new)
- [x] Helper buttons? (new)
- [x] Debug Menu
And potentially
- [x] Toolbar
- [x] Style menu
- [ ] Share zone
- [x] Navigation zone
- [ ] Other zones
### Change Type
- [x] `major` — Breaking change
### Test Plan
1. use the context menu
2. use the custom context menu example
3. use cursor chat in the context menu
- [x] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
As discussed offline, just making `yarn test` do what we expect it to.
### Change Type
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
Biome as it is now didn't work out for us 😢
Summary for posterity:
* it IS much, much faster, fast enough to skip any sort of caching
* we couldn't fully replace Prettier just yet. We use Prettier
programmatically to format code in docs, and Biome's JS interface is
officially alpha and [had legacy peer deps
set](https://github.com/biomejs/biome/pull/1756) (which would fail our
CI build as we don't allow installation warnings)
* ternary formatting differs from Prettier, leading to a large diff
https://github.com/biomejs/biome/issues/1661
* import sorting differs from Prettier's
`prettier-plugin-organize-imports`, making the diff even bigger
* the deal breaker is a multi-second delay on saving large files (for us
it's
[Editor.ts](https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/blob/main/packages/editor/src/lib/editor/Editor.ts))
in VSCode when import sorting is enabled. There is a seemingly relevant
Biome issue where I posted a small summary of our findings:
https://github.com/biomejs/biome/issues/1569#issuecomment-1930411623
Further actions:
* reevaluate in a few months as Biome matures
### Change Type
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package
Biome seems to be MUCH faster than Prettier. Unfortunately, it
introduces some formatting changes around the ternary operator, so we
have to update files in the repo. To make revert easier if we need it,
the change is split into two PRs. This PR introduces a Biome CI check
and reformats all files accordingly.
## Change Type
- [x] `minor` — New feature
Biome seems to be MUCH faster than Prettier. Unfortunately, it
introduces some formatting changes around the ternary operator, so we
have to update files in the repo. To make revert easier if we need it,
the change is split into two PRs. This PR has only config/package
changes and is expected to fail the CI.
## Change Type
- [x] `minor` — New feature
The script that prunes old preview deployments in cloudlfare was broken
when we moved dotcom into the public repo. This fixes it.
### Change Type
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
This PR introduces a new Cloudflare worker for health checks.
At the moment the worker only translates Updown webhooks into Discord
webhooks. In the future we can teach this worker to check more things.
### Change Type
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
`scripts/clean.sh` was using a hardcoded Yarn [to avoid `npx yarn` using
Yarn
1](4242f6ee3d).
However, apparently the Blessed Way of using Yarn is to use `corepack`
and have it install the Yarn version specified in `packageManager`.
### Change Type
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package
Fix docs build.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
A few things happening here
- Delete our service worker. Turns out that a couple of years back
browsers decided that a service worker is no longer required for a PWA
so you can just have the manifest and still install on the user's
device.
- Cache tldraw's assets as part of the dotcom vite asset pipeline. This
allows them to participate in the asset coalescing (preserving old
versions of asset files so old clients don't stop working when you
deploy new versions of things, see
https://github.com/tldraw/brivate/pull/3132 for more context).
- Add a new 'imports.vite.js' file to the assets package, because we
import a bunch of json translation files, and vite imports .json files
as parsed json objects instead of string urls, and there's no good way
to tell it not to. Even if there was we wouldn't want to impose that
config on our users. So another way to tell vite to load any asset as a
url string is to append `?url` to the end of the import path. That's
what this file does.
closes [#2486](https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/issues/2486)
### Change Type
- [x] `minor` — New feature
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Release Notes
- Fix 'could not load assets' error that we often see on tldraw.com
after a deploy
A neighbouring PR #2481 changes Yarn version, which fails the build on
Vercel. This PR extracts the invocations Vercel uses into bash scripts,
so they can be changed atomically.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
This PR moves the tldraw.com app into the public repo.
### Change Type
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
---------
Co-authored-by: Dan Groshev <git@dgroshev.com>
Co-authored-by: alex <alex@dytry.ch>
This PR adds the docs app back into the tldraw monorepo.
## Deploying
We'll want to update our deploy script to update the SOURCE_SHA to the
newest release sha... and then deploy the docs pulling api.json files
from that release. We _could_ update the docs on every push to main, but
we don't have to unless something has changed. Right now there's no
automated deployments from this repo.
## Side effects
To make this one work, I needed to update the lock file. This might be
ok (new year new lock file), and everything builds as expected, though
we may want to spend some time with our scripts to be sure that things
are all good.
I also updated our prettier installation, which decided to add trailing
commas to every generic type. Which is, I suppose, [correct
behavior](https://github.com/prettier/prettier-vscode/issues/955)? But
that caused diffs in every file, which is unfortunate.
### Change Type
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
Follow up to https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/pull/2439. Should fix the
publishing script so that the next time we run it we don't run in the
the same issue.
We could also move the file directly to the `src` dir, but it seems
since only `ui` uses the version it was nested under the `ui` dir 🤷
### Change Type
- [x] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
---------
Co-authored-by: David Sheldrick <d.j.sheldrick@gmail.com>
This PR adds our custom version of Shantell Sans. Not sure if we need to
keep the old file around for backwards compat?
### Change Type
- [x] `major`
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
---------
Co-authored-by: huppy-bot[bot] <128400622+huppy-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR updates the licenses across tldraw to a bespoke tldraw license.
The idea here is leverage dual licensing for revenue from companies
using tldraw. The source code and its distributions are provided under a
non-commercial license (tldraw) while we offer to sell / give out an
alternative exclusive-use license for companies who wish to use the
product for commercial purposes.
- [x] Add new license
- [x] Change licenses in package.jsons
- [x] Update READMEs
- [x] Update docs (separate repo PR)
- [x] Have alternative license in hand (US)
- [ ] Have alternative license in hand (UK)
- [x] Have sales contract in hand (US)
- [ ] Have sales contract in hand (UK)
### Change Type
- [x] `major` — Breaking change
Adds `--cache` flag to prettier which significantly speeds up `yarn
format`:
https://prettier.io/docs/en/cli#--cache
One downside is that changing the plugins we use with prettier will not
cause the cache to invalidate. Stills seems worth it though.
> Plugins version and implementation are not used as cache keys. We
recommend that you delete the cache when updating plugins.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Run `yarn format`
2. Run `yarn format` again, this time it should be significantly faster.
### Release Notes
- Speed up formatting of files via `yarn format`.
follow up to #1950
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
This last day or two our npm publish script has been randomly failing
due to npm flakiness. I'm seeing the following error:
Failed to save packument. A common cause is if you try to publish a new
package before the previous package has been fully processed.
This doesn't seem to be our fault since we're publishing things in the
right order, the version numbers and package.json files are all correct,
and we're waiting for things to appear in the registry after publishing
before moving on to the next package.
So I'm thinking maybe npm is a little tired right now or something and
needs a little extra time to handle things.
So I've wrapped our publish command inside a retry block.
At the same time I noticed that the `--tolerate-republish` flag does not
seem to be working for canary version numbers, so I've added some extra
logic for that too. Hopefully this means if things fail due to
persistent npm flake we can just run the action again.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
