This PR changes the structure of the docs site's sidebar.
I think this signposts more clearly what the different pages are for.
And it also paves the way for some work I want to do on
expanding+refining the Editor docs.
This PR also simplifies URL for all sidebar links.
It's a bit scrappy, but I think it feels simple enough to work with, and
easy-enough to change in the future.
> But hey! I've been doing this a couple times recently. Maybe we should
refactor? Or maybe we should keep going with what we've got and focus on
getting these docs *done*.
### Change Type
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Check that all the sidebar links go to where you expect.
2. Check that old URLs redirect to the right pages, eg: `/docs/usage`
should go to the usage page.
### Release Notes
- Documentation: Restructured the sidebar for clarity.
This PR changes the paths that we use for uncategorised pages on the
docs site.
It also redirects the old paths to the new ones.
```
// BEFORE
tldraw.dev/docs/ucg/shapes
// AFTER
tldraw.dev/docs/shapes
```
I think that this is more intuitive, and will make the links that we
share a bit clearer.
eg: As a by-product, it fixes some broken links from the introduction
page.
As a trade-off, this PR makes our pathing system a bit more complicated.
But I don't think it's tooooo bad? WDYT?
### Change Type
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Navigate to `/docs/shapes` on the docs site.
2. Make sure that it goes to the Shapes page.
3. Do the same for `/docs/ucg/shapes`
### Release Notes
- Documentation: Cleaned up some paths.
This PR adds a contributor license agreement (CLA) to the project.
Contributors will need to sign the CLA before we merge their PRs. This
will be handled automatically via a bot here on GitHub.
## Context
Did you know tldraw is a [venture
backed](https://tldraw.substack.com/p/tiny-little-seed-round) company?
Our CLA is designed to protect our options for any future re-licensing
of the project's code or transferring ownership, which can become
complicated when taking public contributions community, but which can
become necessary by fate and/or go to market strategies.
A CLA adds a bit of friction and hassle for contributors, however I'd
prefer to be upfront about our relationship rather than doing what many
open source projects have done in the past, which is relicensing code
contributed without such prior agreement.
If you have any questions, feel free to post them below.
### Change Type
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package (will not publish a new version)
