This PR adds a user preference for "dynamic size mode" where the scale
of shapes (text size, stroke width) is relative to the current zoom
level. This means that the stroke width in screen pixels (or text size
in screen pixels) is identical regardless of zoom level.
- [x] Draw shape
- [x] Text shape
- [x] Highlighter shape
- [x] Geo shape
- [x] Arrow shape
- [x] Note shape
- [x] Line shape
Embed shape?
### Change Type
- [x] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [x] `feature` — New feature
### Test Plan
1. Use the tools.
2. Change zoom
- [ ] Unit Tests
### Release Notes
- Adds a dynamic size user preferences.
- Removes double click to reset scale on text shapes.
- Removes double click to reset autosize on text shapes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Taha <98838967+Taha-Hassan-Git@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: huppy-bot[bot] <128400622+huppy-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There's been some flakiness on the camera e2e tests. I _think_ this
would help resolve it, theory being that it's not finished scrolling
when we take the reading.
example failure:
https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/actions/runs/9222574205/job/25373998190?pr=3827
### Change Type
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Scope' label ❗️ -->
- [ ] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [ ] `dotcom` — Changes the tldraw.com web app
- [ ] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
- [ ] `vs code` — Changes to the vscode plugin
- [x] `internal` — Does not affect user-facing stuff
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Type' label ❗️ -->
- [ ] `bugfix` — Bug fix
- [ ] `feature` — New feature
- [ ] `improvement` — Improving existing features
- [ ] `chore` — Updating dependencies, other boring stuff
- [ ] `galaxy brain` — Architectural changes
- [x] `tests` — Changes to any test code
- [ ] `tools` — Changes to infrastructure, CI, internal scripts,
debugging tools, etc.
- [ ] `dunno` — I don't know
This PR adds a heart geo shape. ❤️
It also:
- adds `toSvgPathData` to geometry2d
- uses geometry2d in places where previously we recalculated things like
perimeter of ellipse
- flattens geo shape util components
- [x] Calculate the path length for the DashStyleHeart
### Change Type
- [x] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [x] `feature` — New feature
### Release Notes
- Adds a heart shape to the geo shape set.
Typescript's type aliases (`type X = thing`) can refer to basically
anything, which makes it hard to write an automatic document formatter
for them. Interfaces on the other hand are only object, so they play
much nicer with docs. Currently, object-flavoured type aliases don't
really get expanded at all on our docs site, which means we have a bunch
of docs content that's not shown on the site.
This diff introduces a lint rule that forces `interface X {foo: bar}`s
instead of `type X = {foo: bar}` where possible, as it results in a much
better documentation experience:
Before:
<img width="437" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-22 at 15 24 13"
src="https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/assets/1489520/32606fd1-6832-4a1e-aa5f-f0534d160c92">
After:
<img width="431" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-22 at 15 33 01"
src="https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/assets/1489520/4e0d59ee-c38e-4056-b9fd-6a7f15d28f0f">
### Change Type
- [x] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [x] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
- [x] `improvement` — Improving existing features
This PR adds E2E tests for panning and zooming using touch gestures and
zooming using the scrollwheel input.
### Change Type
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Scope' label ❗️ -->
- [ ] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [ ] `dotcom` — Changes the tldraw.com web app
- [ ] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
- [ ] `vs code` — Changes to the vscode plugin
- [x] `internal` — Does not affect user-facing stuff
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Type' label ❗️ -->
- [ ] `bugfix` — Bug fix
- [ ] `feature` — New feature
- [ ] `improvement` — Improving existing features
- [ ] `chore` — Updating dependencies, other boring stuff
- [ ] `galaxy brain` — Architectural changes
- [x] `tests` — Changes to any test code
- [ ] `tools` — Changes to infrastructure, CI, internal scripts,
debugging tools, etc.
- [ ] `dunno` — I don't know
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Adds E2E tests for the camera
Focus management is really scattered across the codebase. There's sort
of a battle between different code paths to make the focus the correct
desired state. It seemed to grow like a knot and once I started pulling
on one thread to see if it was still needed you could see underneath
that it was accounting for another thing underneath that perhaps wasn't
needed.
The impetus for this PR came but especially during the text label
rework, now that it's much more easy to jump around from textfield to
textfield. It became apparent that we were playing whack-a-mole trying
to preserve the right focus conditions (especially on iOS, ugh).
This tries to remove as many hacks as possible, and bring together in
place the focus logic (and in the darkness, bind them).
## Places affected
- [x] `useEditableText`: was able to remove a bunch of the focus logic
here. In addition, it doesn't look like we need to save the selection
range anymore.
- lingering footgun that needed to be fixed anyway: if there are two
labels in the same shape, because we were just checking `editingShapeId
=== id`, the two text labels would have just fought each other for
control
- [x] `useFocusEvents`: nixed and refactored — we listen to the store in
`FocusManager` and then take care of autoFocus there
- [x] `useSafariFocusOutFix`: nixed. not necessary anymore because we're
not trying to refocus when blurring in `useEditableText`. original PR
for reference: https://github.com/tldraw/brivate/pull/79
- [x] `defaultSideEffects`: moved logic to `FocusManager`
- [x] `PointingShape` focus for `startTranslating`, decided to leave
this alone actually.
- [x] `TldrawUIButton`: it doesn't look like this focus bug fix is
needed anymore, original PR for reference:
https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/pull/2630
- [x] `useDocumentEvents`: left alone its manual focus after the Escape
key is hit
- [x] `FrameHeading`: double focus/select doesn't seem necessary anymore
- [x] `useCanvasEvents`: `onPointerDown` focus logic never happened b/c
in `Editor.ts` we `clearedMenus` on pointer down
- [x] `onTouchStart`: looks like `document.body.click()` is not
necessary anymore
## Future Changes
- [ ] a11y: work on having an accessebility focus ring
- [ ] Page visibility API:
(https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Page_Visibility_API)
events when tab is back in focus vs. background, different kind of focus
- [ ] Reexamine places we manually dispatch `pointer_down` events to see
if they're necessary.
- [ ] Minor: get rid of `useContainer` maybe? Is it really necessary to
have this hook? you can just do `useEditor` → `editor.getContainer()`,
feels superfluous.
## Methodology
Looked for places where we do:
- `body.click()`
- places we do `container.focus()`
- places we do `container.blur()`
- places we do `editor.updateInstanceState({ isFocused })`
- places we do `autofocus`
- searched for `document.activeElement`
### Change Type
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Scope' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [ ] `dotcom` — Changes the tldraw.com web app
- [ ] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
- [ ] `vs code` — Changes to the vscode plugin
- [ ] `internal` — Does not affect user-facing stuff
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Type' label ❗️ -->
- [ ] `bugfix` — Bug fix
- [ ] `feature` — New feature
- [x] `improvement` — Improving existing features
- [ ] `chore` — Updating dependencies, other boring stuff
- [ ] `galaxy brain` — Architectural changes
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code
- [ ] `tools` — Changes to infrastructure, CI, internal scripts,
debugging tools, etc.
- [ ] `dunno` — I don't know
### Test Plan
- [x] run test-focus.spec.ts
- [x] check MultipleExample
- [x] check EditorFocusExample
- [x] check autoFocus
- [x] check style panel usage and focus events in general
- [x] check text editing focus, lots of different devices,
mobile/desktop
### Release Notes
- Focus: rework and untangle existing focus management logic in the SDK
First draft of the new bindings API. We'll follow this up with some API
refinements, tests, documentation, and examples.
Bindings are a new record type for establishing relationships between
two shapes so they can update at the same time.
### Change Type
- [x] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [x] `feature` — New feature
### Release Notes
#### Breaking changes
- The `start` and `end` properties on `TLArrowShape` no longer have
`type: point | binding`. Instead, they're always a point, which may be
out of date if a binding exists. To check for & retrieve arrow bindings,
use `getArrowBindings(editor, shape)` instead.
- `getArrowTerminalsInArrowSpace` must be passed a `TLArrowBindings` as
a third argument: `getArrowTerminalsInArrowSpace(editor, shape,
getArrowBindings(editor, shape))`
- The following types have been renamed:
- `ShapeProps` -> `RecordProps`
- `ShapePropsType` -> `RecordPropsType`
- `TLShapePropsMigrations` -> `TLPropsMigrations`
- `SchemaShapeInfo` -> `SchemaPropsInfo`
---------
Co-authored-by: David Sheldrick <d.j.sheldrick@gmail.com>
Followup to https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/pull/3188 (although this
problem was there before that PR)
This does more work for RTL rendering in SVG context, especially since
we position each span one-by-one.
I had to do a bit of esoteric spelunking and it turns out
[`unicode-bidi:
plaintext`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/unicode-bidi)
solves our issue even though it isn't really recommend to be used by web
developers. Fun times 🙃
Before:
<img width="369" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-02 at 11 45 44"
src="https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/assets/469604/df55e03a-4760-4b8f-adad-ed1a8c13ad51">
After:
<img width="365" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-02 at 11 54 48"
src="https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/assets/469604/3339bbf4-041a-4fdf-8b6e-6fa19dfb0a9e">
### Change Type
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Scope' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [ ] `dotcom` — Changes the tldraw.com web app
- [ ] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
- [ ] `vs code` — Changes to the vscode plugin
- [ ] `internal` — Does not affect user-facing stuff
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Type' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `bugfix` — Bug fix
- [ ] `feature` — New feature
- [ ] `improvement` — Improving existing features
- [ ] `chore` — Updating dependencies, other boring stuff
- [ ] `galaxy brain` — Architectural changes
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code
- [ ] `tools` — Changes to infrastructure, CI, internal scripts,
debugging tools, etc.
- [ ] `dunno` — I don't know
### Test Plan
1. Test LTR text.
2. Test RTL text.
3. Test mixed LTR/RTL on different lines.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [x] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- [Add a brief release note for your PR here.](textfields: fix RTL
layout for SVG exports)
---------
Co-authored-by: huppy-bot[bot] <128400622+huppy-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR buffs input events.
## The story so far
In the olde days, we throttled events from the canvas events hook so
that a pointer event would only be sent every 1/60th of a second. This
was fine but made drawing on the iPad / 120FPS displays a little sad.
Then we removed this throttle. It seemed fine! Drawing at 120FPS was
great. We improved some rendering speeds and tightened some loops so
that the engine could keep up with 2x the number of points in a line.
Then we started noticing that iPads and other screens could start
choking on events as it received new inputs and tried to process and
render inputs while still recovering from a previous dropped frame. Even
worse, on iPad the work of rendering at 120FPS was causing the browser
to throttle the app after some sustained drawing. Yikes!
### Batching
I did an experimental PR (#3180) to bring back batching but do it in the
editor instead. What we would do is: rather than immediately processing
an event when we get it, we would instead put the event into a buffer.
On the next 60FPS tick, we would flush the buffer and process all of the
events. We'd have them all in the same transaction so that the app would
only render once.
### Render batching?
We then tried batching the renders, so that the app would only ever
render once per (next) frame. This added a bunch of complexity around
events that needed to happen synchronously, such as writing text in a
text field. Some inputs could "lag" in a way familiar to anyone who's
tried to update an input's state asynchronously. So we backed out of
this.
### Coalescing?
Another idea from @ds300 was to "coalesce" the events. This would be
useful because, while some interactions like drawing would require the
in-between frames in order to avoid data loss, most interactions (like
resizing) didn't actually need the in-between frames, they could just
use the last input of a given type.
Coalescing turned out to be trickier than we thought, though. Often a
state node required information from elsewhere in the app when
processing an event (such as camera position or page point, which is
derived from the camera position), and so the coalesced events would
need to also include this information or else the handlers wouldn't work
the way they should when processing the "final" event during a tick.
So we backed out of the coalescing strategy for now. Here's the [PR that
removes](937469d69d)
it.
### Let's just buffer the fuckers
So this PR now should only include input buffering.
I think there are ways to achieve the same coalescing-like results
through the state nodes, which could gather information during the
`onPointerMove` handler and then actually make changes during the
`onTick` handler, so that the changes are only done as many time as
necessary. This should help with e.g. resizing lots of shapes at once.
But first let's land the buffering!
---
Mitja's original text:
This PR builds on top of Steve's [experiment
PR](https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/pull/3180) here. It also adds event
coalescing for [`pointerMove`
events](https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/blob/mitja/input-buffering/packages/editor/src/lib/editor/Editor.ts#L8364-L8368).
The API is [somewhat similar
](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/PointerEvent/getCoalescedEvents)
to `getCoalescedEvent`. In `StateNodes` we register an `onPointerMove`
handler. When the event happens it gets called with the event `info`.
There's now an additional field on `TLMovePointerEvent` called
`coalescedInfo` which includes all the events. It's then on the user to
process all of these.
I decided on this API since it allows us to only expose one event
handler, but it still gives the users access to all events if they need
them.
We would otherwise either need to:
- Expose two events (coalesced and non-coalesced one and complicate the
api) so that state nodes like Resizing would not be triggered for each
pointer move.
- Offer some methods on the editor that would allow use to get the
coalesced information. Then the nodes that need that info could request
it. I [tried
this](9ad973da3a (diff-32f1de9a5a9ec72aa49a8d18a237fbfff301610f4689a4af6b37f47af435aafcR67)),
but it didn't feel good.
This also complicated the editor inputs. The events need to store
information about the event (like the mouse position when the event
happened for `onPointerMove`). But we cannot immediately update inputs
when the event happens. To make this work for `pointerMove` events I've
added `pagePoint`. It's
[calculated](https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/pull/3223/files#diff-980beb0aa0ee9aa6d1cd386cef3dc05a500c030638ffb58d45fd11b79126103fR71)
when the event triggers and then consumers can get it straight from the
event (like
[Drawing](https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/pull/3223/files#diff-32f1de9a5a9ec72aa49a8d18a237fbfff301610f4689a4af6b37f47af435aafcR104)).
### Change Type
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Scope' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [ ] `dotcom` — Changes the tldraw.com web app
- [ ] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
- [ ] `vs code` — Changes to the vscode plugin
- [ ] `internal` — Does not affect user-facing stuff
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Type' label ❗️ -->
- [ ] `bugfix` — Bug fix
- [ ] `feature` — New feature
- [x] `improvement` — Improving existing features
- [ ] `chore` — Updating dependencies, other boring stuff
- [ ] `galaxy brain` — Architectural changes
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code
- [ ] `tools` — Changes to infrastructure, CI, internal scripts,
debugging tools, etc.
- [ ] `dunno` — I don't know
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
4.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
## Migration path
1. If any of your shapes implement `toSvg` for exports, you'll need to
replace your implementation with a new version that returns JSX (it's a
react component) instead of manually constructing SVG DOM nodes
2. `editor.getSvg` is deprecated. It still works, but will be going away
in a future release. If you still need SVGs as DOM elements rather than
strings, use `new DOMParser().parseFromString(svgString,
'image/svg+xml').firstElementChild`
## The change in detail
At the moment, our SVG exports very carefully try to recreate the
visuals of our shapes by manually constructing SVG DOM nodes. On its own
this is really painful, but it also results in a lot of duplicated logic
between the `component` and `getSvg` methods of shape utils.
In #3020, we looked at using string concatenation & DOMParser to make
this a bit less painful. This works, but requires specifying namespaces
everywhere, is still pretty painful (no syntax highlighting or
formatting), and still results in all that duplicated logic.
I briefly experimented with creating my own version of the javascript
language that let you embed XML like syntax directly. I was going to
call it EXTREME JAVASCRIPT or XJS for short, but then I noticed that we
already wrote the whole of tldraw in this thing called react and a (imo
much worse named) version of the javascript xml thing already existed.
Given the entire library already depends on react, what would it look
like if we just used react directly for these exports? Turns out things
get a lot simpler! Take a look at lmk what you think
This diff was intended as a proof of concept, but is actually pretty
close to being landable. The main thing is that here, I've deliberately
leant into this being a big breaking change to see just how much code we
could delete (turns out: lots). We could if we wanted to make this
without making it a breaking change at all, but it would add back a lot
of complexity on our side and run a fair bit slower
---------
Co-authored-by: huppy-bot[bot] <128400622+huppy-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This diff adds a PDF editor example. It's pretty similar to the image
annotator, but is a better way to demo longer axis-locked scrolling.
There are some pretty big drawbacks to it at the moment (see the TODO
list on `PdfEditor.tsx`)
I'm going to land as-is for now, and we can iterate on it in the future.
### Change Type
- [x] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
- [x] `feature` — New feature
This diff mostly adds an image annotator example, but also has a couple
of drive-by changes:
- Added a 'use-cases' category to the examples app for this style of
mini-app
- Add `editor.pageToViewport`, which is like `editor.pageToScreen` but
works with viewport coordinates (better for `InFrontOfTheCanvas` stuff)
- Prevent the chrome side-swipe-to-go-back thing in the examples app
Some cool features of the image annotator:
- The image cannot be unlocked, and cannot have shapes places behind it
- I still need to work out a way of removing the context menu though
- Anything you place outside the bounds of the image (and therefore
outside the bounds of the export) will be greyed out
- You can't change pages
- unless you find the "move to page" action... need to fix that
- The camera is constrained! It'll keep the image roughly centered on
the screen. If you pick a very long thin image, you can only scroll
vertically. If you pick a very big one, it'll default it to a reasonable
size.
### Change Type
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Scope' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [x] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Type' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `feature` — New feature
Fix a bug that was preventing JPG and webp exports from working. Also:
- Re-enable our export snapshot tests which got commented out again
- Fix some react act errors when running tests
### Change Type
- [x] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [x] `bugfix` — Bug fix
When we went from overrides-based to component based UI customisation
APIs, we didn't do the toolbar because it had some significant extra
complexity around overflowing the contents of the menu into the
dropdown. This is really hard to do at render-time with react - you
can't introspect what a component will return to move some of it into an
overflow.
Instead, this diff runs that logic in a `useLayoutEffect` - we render
all the items into both the main toolbar and the overflow menu, then in
the effect (or if the rendered components change) we use CSS to remove
the items we don't need, check which was last active, etc. Originally, I
wasn't really into this approach - but i've actually found it to work
super well and be very reliable.
### Change Type
- [x] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Test the toolbar at many different sizes with many different 'active
tools'
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
This PR:
- adds the export all menu items to the main menu
- removes the export all menu items from the dotcom menus
- removes the shape menu and reverts several changes from
https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/pull/2782. This was not properly
reviewed (I thought it was a PR about hiding / showing menu items).
- fixes a bug with exporting (exporting JSON was not working when the
user had no selected shapes)
- fixes a bug that would prevent "flip shapes" from appearing in the
menu
- prevents export / copy actions from running if there are no shapes on
the page
- allows export / copy actions to default to all shapes on the page if
no shapes are selected
These changes have not been released in the dotcom yet. There's will be
some thrash in the APIs.
# Menu philosophy
In the menu, the **edit** submenu relates to undo/redo, plus the user's
current selection.
Menu items that relate to specific to certain shapes are hidden when not
available.
Menu items that relate to all shapes are disabled when not available.
<img width="640" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/assets/23072548/e467e6bb-d958-4a9a-ac19-1dada52dcfa6">
### Change Type
- [x] `major` — Bug fix
### Test
- Select no shapes (arrange / flip should not be visible)
- Select one geo shape (arrange / flip should not be visible)
- Select two geo shapes (arrange / flip should be visible)
- Select one draw shape (arrange / flip should not be visible)
### Release Notes
- Revert some changes in the menu.
This PR updates our end to end tests so that they check every route in
our examples to ensure that it loads (skipping any routes that don't
features a canvas).
### Change Type
- [x] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
### Test Plan
- [x] End to end tests
Rename `@tldraw/tldraw` to just `tldraw`! `@tldraw/tldraw` still exists
as an alias to `tldraw` for folks who are still using that.
### Test Plan
- [x] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- The `@tldraw/tldraw` package has been renamed to `tldraw`. You can
keep using the old version if you want though!
A basic test for each of the menu areas
fixes TLD-2251
- [x] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
This PR adds E2E tests for the style panel.
It checks that:
- the style panel opens and closes as expected on mobile
- the style panel button is disabled for the eraser tool on mobile
- selecting a style hints the button
- changing a style changes the appearance of the shape
- It also moves a test from the toolbar tests that checks the correct
styles are exposed for the right tools
fixes tld-2222
- [x] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
### Release Notes
- Add style panel E2E tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
This PR adds some e2e tests for the toolbar.
Fixtures have been set up for the toolbar and style panel, and are
fairly barebones at the moment. Eventually each menu should have a
fixture associated with it, and all tests will use the class defined in
the fixtures file.
### Change Type
- [x] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
### Release Notes
- Add e2e tests for the toolbar
This PR refactors our menu systems and provides an interface to hide or
replace individual user interface elements.
# Background
Previously, we've had two types of overrides:
- "schema" overrides that would allow insertion or replacement of items
in the different menus
- "component" overrides that would replace components in the editor's
user interface
This PR is an attempt to unify the two and to provide for additional
cases where the "schema-based" user interface had begun to break down.
# Approach
This PR makes no attempt to change the `actions` or `tools`
overrides—the current system seems to be correct for those because they
are not reactive. The challenge with the other ui schemas is that they
_are_ reactive, and thus the overrides both need to a) be fed in from
outside of the editor as props, and b) react to changes from the editor,
which is an impossible situation.
The new approach is to use React to declare menu items. (Surprise!)
```tsx
function CustomHelpMenuContent() {
return (
<>
<DefaultHelpMenuContent />
<TldrawUiMenuGroup id="custom stuff">
<TldrawUiMenuItem
id="about"
label="Like my posts"
icon="external-link"
readonlyOk
onSelect={() => {
window.open('https://x.com/tldraw', '_blank')
}}
/>
</TldrawUiMenuGroup>
</>
)
}
const components: TLComponents = {
HelpMenuContent: CustomHelpMenuContent,
}
export default function CustomHelpMenuContentExample() {
return (
<div className="tldraw__editor">
<Tldraw components={components} />
</div>
)
}
```
We use a `components` prop with the combined editor and ui components.
- [ ] Create a "layout" component?
- [ ] Make UI components more isolated? If possible, they shouldn't
depend on styles outside of themselves, so that they can be used in
other layouts. Maybe we wait on this because I'm feeling a slippery
slope toward presumptions about configurability.
- [ ] OTOH maybe we go hard and consider these things as separate
components, even packages, with their own interfaces for customizability
/ configurability, just go all the way with it, and see what that looks
like.
# Pros
Top line: you can customize tldraw's user interface in a MUCH more
granular / powerful way than before.
It solves a case where menu items could not be made stateful from
outside of the editor context, and provides the option to do things in
the menus that we couldn't allow previously with the "schema-based"
approach.
It also may (who knows) be more performant because we can locate the
state inside of the components for individual buttons and groups,
instead of all at the top level above the "schema". Because items /
groups decide their own state, we don't have to have big checks on how
many items are selected, or whether we have a flippable state. Items and
groups themselves are allowed to re-build as part of the regular React
lifecycle. Menus aren't constantly being rebuilt, if that were ever an
issue.
Menu items can be shared between different menu types. We'll are
sometimes able to re-use items between, for example, the menu and the
context menu and the actions menu.
Our overrides no longer mutate anything, so there's less weird searching
and finding.
# Cons
This approach can make customization menu contents significantly more
complex, as an end user would need to re-declare most of a menu in order
to make any change to it. Luckily a user can add things to the top or
bottom of the context menu fairly easily. (And who knows, folks may
actually want to do deep customization, and this allows for it.)
It's more code. We are shipping more react components, basically one for
each menu item / group.
Currently this PR does not export the subcomponents, i.e. menu items. If
we do want to export these, then heaven help us, it's going to be a
_lot_ of exports.
# Progress
- [x] Context menu
- [x] Main menu
- [x] Zoom menu
- [x] Help menu
- [x] Actions menu
- [x] Keyboard shortcuts menu
- [x] Quick actions in main menu? (new)
- [x] Helper buttons? (new)
- [x] Debug Menu
And potentially
- [x] Toolbar
- [x] Style menu
- [ ] Share zone
- [x] Navigation zone
- [ ] Other zones
### Change Type
- [x] `major` — Breaking change
### Test Plan
1. use the context menu
2. use the custom context menu example
3. use cursor chat in the context menu
- [x] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
Fixes#2826, extracted from #2680
The problem is that we had two different articles whose ids were being
derived as `persistence`, the `persistence.mdx` file and the
`persistence/` example.
I've
1. Made it an error for two articles to have the same id
2. Renamed the `persistence/` article to `local-storage` since that's
the API it's using.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
3.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
Adds positional keyboard shortcuts to the toolbar. Use the 1, 2, 3, 4
etc keys to activate the corresponding tool on the toolbar.
### Change Type
- [x] `minor` — New feature
### Test Plan
1. Use the number keys to activate toolbar items.
- [x] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- You can now use the number keys to select the corresponding tool from
the toolbar
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
Also tweaks the colours of menus in dark mode to have a little higher
contrast. Fixed#2493
### Change Type
- [x] `patch` — Bug fix
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
---------
Co-authored-by: huppy-bot[bot] <128400622+huppy-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
In #2198, we introduced a regression on ios around image exports. ios
will block copys if they're not called syncronously in a UI event. It's
important to make ios copys like this:
```ts
navigator.clipboard.write(new ClipboardItem(getStuffToCopyAsAPromise())
```
instead of
```ts
getStuffToCopyAsAPromise().then(stuff => {
navigator.clipboard.write(new ClipboardItem(stuff))
})
```
We've written and fixed this bug a few times, which i think is because
of how our export/copy code is written: the formatting is interspersed
with interacting with the browser APIs, which makes it hard to change
one without accidentally affecting the other.
This diff fixes the bug, but also restructures our export/copy code: all
the formatting is handled by `exportToBlob` and related which just
return `Blob`s. This leaves `copyAs`, `exportAs` etc. to just handle
interacting with the browser APIs.
Fixes#2312
### Change Type
- [x] `patch` — Bug fix
### Test Plan
1. Test copy/export as on all browsers
### Release Notes
- Fix a bug preventing copying as an image on iOS
---------
Co-authored-by: huppy-bot[bot] <128400622+huppy-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR adds our custom version of Shantell Sans. Not sure if we need to
keep the old file around for backwards compat?
### Change Type
- [x] `major`
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
---------
Co-authored-by: huppy-bot[bot] <128400622+huppy-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixes a race condition with our snapshot export tests that was causing
them to be flaky.
### Change Type
- [x] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
### Test Plan
- [x] End to end tests
follow up to #2189
adds runtime warnings for deprecated fields. cleans up remaining fields
and usages. Adds a lint rule to prevent access to deprecated fields.
Adds a lint rule to prevent using getters.
### Change Type
- [x] `patch` — Bug fix
This PR adds a custom tool example, the `Screenshot Tool`.
It demonstrates how a user can create a custom tool together with custom
tool UI.
### Change Type
- [x] `minor` — New feature
### Test Plan
1. Use the screenshot example
### Release Notes
- adds ScreenshotTool custom tool example
- improvements and new exports related to copying and exporting images /
files
- loosens up types around icons and translations
- moving `StateNode.isActive` into an atom
- adding `Editor.path`
This PR extracts some improvements from #2198 into a separate PR.
### Release Notes
- adds computed `StateNode.getPath`
- adds computed StateNode.getCurrent`
- adds computed StateNode.getIsActive`
- adds computed `Editor.getPath()`
- makes transition's second property optional
### Change Type
- [x] `minor` — New feature
### Test Plan
- [x] Unit Tests
- [x] End to end tests
Follow up to #2189 and #2202
### Change Type
- [x] `patch` — Bug fix
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
This PR replaces the `.value` getter for the atom with `.get()`
### Change Type
- [x] `major` — Breaking change
---------
Co-authored-by: David Sheldrick <d.j.sheldrick@gmail.com>
Adds a new prop to force mobile mode layout, similar to how the
?layout=mobile query param works.
An alternative of having the prop accept a breakpoint number was
considered, but while that provides more flexibility, it's best if
usages of tldraw don't need to know about the internal workings of
tldraw. (e.g. someone might use breakpoint 7 to get the "desktop" mode,
but that won't be reliable when in the future more breakpoints are
added)
Closes#1709
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [x] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. `<Tldraw persistenceKey="tldraw_example" autoFocus
forceMobileModeLayout />`
2. notice that the layout stays in mobile mode no matter the width of
the screen
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- add new prop to force mobile mode layout
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
Previously, entering a geo shape and adding a bunch of newlines wouldn't
correctly update the shape's height. This fixes that.
### Change Type
- [x] `patch` — Bug fix
### Test Plan
1. Create a geo shape
2. Enter text editing mode
3. Spam the enter key
4. See that the shape grows appropriately
5. Exit editing and check that the trailing newlines have been deleted.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [x] End to end tests
---------
Co-authored-by: huppy-bot[bot] <128400622+huppy-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
This PR restores the controlled nature of focus. Focus allows keyboard
shortcuts and other interactions to occur. The editor's focus should
always / entirely be controlled via the autoFocus prop or by manually
setting `editor.instanceState.isFocused`.
Design note: I'm starting to think that focus is the wrong abstraction,
and that we should instead use a kind of "disabled" state for editors
that the user isn't interacting with directly. In a page where multiple
editors exit (e.g. a notion page), a developer could switch from
disabled to enabled using a first interaction.
### Change Type
- [x] `patch` — Bug fix
### Test Plan
- [x] End to end tests
We got things sliggghhhtly wrong in #1980. That diff was attempting to
fix a bug where the text measurement element would refuse to go above
the viewport size in safari. This was most obvious in the case where
there was no fixed width on a text shape, and that diff fixed that case,
but it was also happening when a fixed width text shape was wider than
viewport - which wasn't covered by that fix. It turned out that that fix
also introduced a bug where shapes would no longer grow along the y-axis
- in part because the relationship between `width`, `maxWidth`, and
`minWidth` is very confusing.
The one-liner fix is to just use `max-content` instead of `fit-content`
- that way, the div ignores the size of its container. But I also
cleared up the API for text measurement to remove the `width` property
entirely in favour of `maxWidth`. I think this makes things much clearer
and as far as I can tell doesn't affect anything.
Closes#1998
### Change Type
- [x] `patch` — Bug fix
### Test Plan
1. Create an arrow & geo shape with labels, plus a note and text shape
2. Try to break text measurement - overflow the bounds, make very wide
text, experiment with fixed/auto-size text, etc.
