This PR buffs input events.
## The story so far
In the olde days, we throttled events from the canvas events hook so
that a pointer event would only be sent every 1/60th of a second. This
was fine but made drawing on the iPad / 120FPS displays a little sad.
Then we removed this throttle. It seemed fine! Drawing at 120FPS was
great. We improved some rendering speeds and tightened some loops so
that the engine could keep up with 2x the number of points in a line.
Then we started noticing that iPads and other screens could start
choking on events as it received new inputs and tried to process and
render inputs while still recovering from a previous dropped frame. Even
worse, on iPad the work of rendering at 120FPS was causing the browser
to throttle the app after some sustained drawing. Yikes!
### Batching
I did an experimental PR (#3180) to bring back batching but do it in the
editor instead. What we would do is: rather than immediately processing
an event when we get it, we would instead put the event into a buffer.
On the next 60FPS tick, we would flush the buffer and process all of the
events. We'd have them all in the same transaction so that the app would
only render once.
### Render batching?
We then tried batching the renders, so that the app would only ever
render once per (next) frame. This added a bunch of complexity around
events that needed to happen synchronously, such as writing text in a
text field. Some inputs could "lag" in a way familiar to anyone who's
tried to update an input's state asynchronously. So we backed out of
this.
### Coalescing?
Another idea from @ds300 was to "coalesce" the events. This would be
useful because, while some interactions like drawing would require the
in-between frames in order to avoid data loss, most interactions (like
resizing) didn't actually need the in-between frames, they could just
use the last input of a given type.
Coalescing turned out to be trickier than we thought, though. Often a
state node required information from elsewhere in the app when
processing an event (such as camera position or page point, which is
derived from the camera position), and so the coalesced events would
need to also include this information or else the handlers wouldn't work
the way they should when processing the "final" event during a tick.
So we backed out of the coalescing strategy for now. Here's the [PR that
removes](937469d69d)
it.
### Let's just buffer the fuckers
So this PR now should only include input buffering.
I think there are ways to achieve the same coalescing-like results
through the state nodes, which could gather information during the
`onPointerMove` handler and then actually make changes during the
`onTick` handler, so that the changes are only done as many time as
necessary. This should help with e.g. resizing lots of shapes at once.
But first let's land the buffering!
---
Mitja's original text:
This PR builds on top of Steve's [experiment
PR](https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/pull/3180) here. It also adds event
coalescing for [`pointerMove`
events](https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/blob/mitja/input-buffering/packages/editor/src/lib/editor/Editor.ts#L8364-L8368).
The API is [somewhat similar
](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/PointerEvent/getCoalescedEvents)
to `getCoalescedEvent`. In `StateNodes` we register an `onPointerMove`
handler. When the event happens it gets called with the event `info`.
There's now an additional field on `TLMovePointerEvent` called
`coalescedInfo` which includes all the events. It's then on the user to
process all of these.
I decided on this API since it allows us to only expose one event
handler, but it still gives the users access to all events if they need
them.
We would otherwise either need to:
- Expose two events (coalesced and non-coalesced one and complicate the
api) so that state nodes like Resizing would not be triggered for each
pointer move.
- Offer some methods on the editor that would allow use to get the
coalesced information. Then the nodes that need that info could request
it. I [tried
this](9ad973da3a (diff-32f1de9a5a9ec72aa49a8d18a237fbfff301610f4689a4af6b37f47af435aafcR67)),
but it didn't feel good.
This also complicated the editor inputs. The events need to store
information about the event (like the mouse position when the event
happened for `onPointerMove`). But we cannot immediately update inputs
when the event happens. To make this work for `pointerMove` events I've
added `pagePoint`. It's
[calculated](https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/pull/3223/files#diff-980beb0aa0ee9aa6d1cd386cef3dc05a500c030638ffb58d45fd11b79126103fR71)
when the event triggers and then consumers can get it straight from the
event (like
[Drawing](https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/pull/3223/files#diff-32f1de9a5a9ec72aa49a8d18a237fbfff301610f4689a4af6b37f47af435aafcR104)).
### Change Type
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Scope' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [ ] `dotcom` — Changes the tldraw.com web app
- [ ] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
- [ ] `vs code` — Changes to the vscode plugin
- [ ] `internal` — Does not affect user-facing stuff
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Type' label ❗️ -->
- [ ] `bugfix` — Bug fix
- [ ] `feature` — New feature
- [x] `improvement` — Improving existing features
- [ ] `chore` — Updating dependencies, other boring stuff
- [ ] `galaxy brain` — Architectural changes
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code
- [ ] `tools` — Changes to infrastructure, CI, internal scripts,
debugging tools, etc.
- [ ] `dunno` — I don't know
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
4.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
Our font styling for dotcom vs. our examples app is _ever_ so slightly
different.
- the Inter fonts weren't being consistently linked. Sometimes we
grabbed 700, sometimes 800, sometimes 500 or 400
- the dotcom specified a default weight of 500 and line-height 1.6 which
was not specified in the our UI. this made the UI inconsistent
- furthermore, we didn't specify `text-rendering` nor `font-smooth` and
that also made things inconsistent
- finally, our buttons needed to inherit the line-height because
otherwise they were reverting to the user agent default
before:
<img width="1800" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-26 at 15 23 12"
src="https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/assets/469604/ee25c79c-5b43-4501-a126-255a9b03a4b8">
after:
<img width="1800" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-26 at 15 22 53"
src="https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/assets/469604/a7a62441-e767-4919-b2bb-5c283eadd230">
### Change Type
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Scope' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [ ] `dotcom` — Changes the tldraw.com web app
- [ ] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
- [ ] `vs code` — Changes to the vscode plugin
- [ ] `internal` — Does not affect user-facing stuff
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Type' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `bugfix` — Bug fix
- [ ] `feature` — New feature
- [ ] `improvement` — Improving existing features
- [ ] `chore` — Updating dependencies, other boring stuff
- [ ] `galaxy brain` — Architectural changes
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code
- [ ] `tools` — Changes to infrastructure, CI, internal scripts,
debugging tools, etc.
- [ ] `dunno` — I don't know
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
This is the first of three textfield changes. This starts with making
the speech bubble actually have text. Also, it creates a TipTap example
and how that would be wired up.
🎵 this is dangerous, I walk through textfields so watch your head rock 🎵
### Change Type
- [x] `minor` — New feature
### Release Notes
- Refactor textfields be composable/swappable.
Adds reference docs, guide in the "Editor" article, and examples for the
side effects manager.
There are 4 new examples:
1. Before create/update shape - constrains shapes to be places within a
circle
2. Before delete shape - prevent red shapes from being deleted
3. After create/update shape - make sure there's only ever one red shape
on the page at a time
4. After delete shape - delete frames after their last child is deleted
As these examples all require fairly specific configurations of shapes
(or are hard to understand without some visual hinting in the case of
placing shapes within a circle), I've included a `createDemoShapes`
function in each of these which makes sure the examples start with
shapes that will quickly show you the side effects in action. I've kept
these separate from the main code (in a function at the bottom), so
hopefully that won't be a source of confusion to anyone working from
these examples.
### Change Type
- [x] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
- [x] `improvement` — Improving existing features
We allowed the users to customize pretty much all of our components, but
not the `DebugPanel`. We had overrides for `DebugMenu` which is
displayed inside the panel, but not for the panel itself.
I guess it makes sense to allow users to override both?
Reported
[here](https://discord.com/channels/859816885297741824/1221663945627140157/1221663945627140157).
Fixes https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/issues/3260
### Change Type
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Scope' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [ ] `dotcom` — Changes the tldraw.com web app
- [ ] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
- [ ] `vs code` — Changes to the vscode plugin
- [ ] `internal` — Does not affect user-facing stuff
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Type' label ❗️ -->
- [ ] `bugfix` — Bug fix
- [x] `feature` — New feature
- [ ] `improvement` — Improving existing features
- [ ] `chore` — Updating dependencies, other boring stuff
- [ ] `galaxy brain` — Architectural changes
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code
- [ ] `tools` — Changes to infrastructure, CI, internal scripts,
debugging tools, etc.
- [ ] `dunno` — I don't know
### Test Plan
1. Best way to test this is to check the `Hidden UI Components` example.
2. Play around with commenting out the `DebugPanel` and `DebugMenu`
overrides.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Allow users to fully override the `DebugPanel`.
## Migration path
1. If any of your shapes implement `toSvg` for exports, you'll need to
replace your implementation with a new version that returns JSX (it's a
react component) instead of manually constructing SVG DOM nodes
2. `editor.getSvg` is deprecated. It still works, but will be going away
in a future release. If you still need SVGs as DOM elements rather than
strings, use `new DOMParser().parseFromString(svgString,
'image/svg+xml').firstElementChild`
## The change in detail
At the moment, our SVG exports very carefully try to recreate the
visuals of our shapes by manually constructing SVG DOM nodes. On its own
this is really painful, but it also results in a lot of duplicated logic
between the `component` and `getSvg` methods of shape utils.
In #3020, we looked at using string concatenation & DOMParser to make
this a bit less painful. This works, but requires specifying namespaces
everywhere, is still pretty painful (no syntax highlighting or
formatting), and still results in all that duplicated logic.
I briefly experimented with creating my own version of the javascript
language that let you embed XML like syntax directly. I was going to
call it EXTREME JAVASCRIPT or XJS for short, but then I noticed that we
already wrote the whole of tldraw in this thing called react and a (imo
much worse named) version of the javascript xml thing already existed.
Given the entire library already depends on react, what would it look
like if we just used react directly for these exports? Turns out things
get a lot simpler! Take a look at lmk what you think
This diff was intended as a proof of concept, but is actually pretty
close to being landable. The main thing is that here, I've deliberately
leant into this being a big breaking change to see just how much code we
could delete (turns out: lots). We could if we wanted to make this
without making it a breaking change at all, but it would add back a lot
of complexity on our side and run a fair bit slower
---------
Co-authored-by: huppy-bot[bot] <128400622+huppy-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR adds an example demonstrating some common practices for using
tldraw as an inline block. For example, in Notion-like applications.
This includes:
- Making sure that only one editor has focus at a time.
- Always defaulting to the hand tool when you click into an editor.
- Deselecting everything when an editor loses focus.
- Hiding the UI when an editor is not focused.
- Disabling edge scrolling by default.
- Using a stripped down UI to make the most of the available space.
- Removing actions from the context menu to match the stripped down UI.
### Change Type
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Try out the **Inline behavior** example.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Docs: Added an example for inline behaviour.
This diff adds a PDF editor example. It's pretty similar to the image
annotator, but is a better way to demo longer axis-locked scrolling.
There are some pretty big drawbacks to it at the moment (see the TODO
list on `PdfEditor.tsx`)
I'm going to land as-is for now, and we can iterate on it in the future.
### Change Type
- [x] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
- [x] `feature` — New feature
This diff mostly adds an image annotator example, but also has a couple
of drive-by changes:
- Added a 'use-cases' category to the examples app for this style of
mini-app
- Add `editor.pageToViewport`, which is like `editor.pageToScreen` but
works with viewport coordinates (better for `InFrontOfTheCanvas` stuff)
- Prevent the chrome side-swipe-to-go-back thing in the examples app
Some cool features of the image annotator:
- The image cannot be unlocked, and cannot have shapes places behind it
- I still need to work out a way of removing the context menu though
- Anything you place outside the bounds of the image (and therefore
outside the bounds of the export) will be greyed out
- You can't change pages
- unless you find the "move to page" action... need to fix that
- The camera is constrained! It'll keep the image roughly centered on
the screen. If you pick a very long thin image, you can only scroll
vertically. If you pick a very big one, it'll default it to a reasonable
size.
### Change Type
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Scope' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [x] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Type' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `feature` — New feature
Currently, we only use native `structuredClone` in the browser, falling
back to `JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(...))` elsewhere, despite Node
supporting `structuredClone` [since
v17](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/structuredClone)
and Cloudflare Workers supporting it [since
2022](https://blog.cloudflare.com/standards-compliant-workers-api/).
This PR adjusts our shim to use the native `structuredClone` on all
platforms, if available.
Additionally, `jsdom` doesn't implement `structuredClone`, a bug [open
since 2022](https://github.com/jsdom/jsdom/issues/3363). This PR patches
`jsdom` environment in all packages/apps that use it for tests.
Also includes a driveby removal of `deepCopy`, a function that is
strictly inferior to `structuredClone`.
### Change Type
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Scope' label ❗️ -->
- [x] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [x] `dotcom` — Changes the tldraw.com web app
- [ ] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
- [ ] `vs code` — Changes to the vscode plugin
- [ ] `internal` — Does not affect user-facing stuff
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Type' label ❗️ -->
- [ ] `bugfix` — Bug fix
- [ ] `feature` — New feature
- [x] `improvement` — Improving existing features
- [x] `chore` — Updating dependencies, other boring stuff
- [ ] `galaxy brain` — Architectural changes
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code
- [ ] `tools` — Changes to infrastructure, CI, internal scripts,
debugging tools, etc.
- [ ] `dunno` — I don't know
### Test Plan
1. A smoke test would be enough
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [x] End to end tests
Fix a bug that was preventing JPG and webp exports from working. Also:
- Re-enable our export snapshot tests which got commented out again
- Fix some react act errors when running tests
### Change Type
- [x] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [x] `bugfix` — Bug fix
When we went from overrides-based to component based UI customisation
APIs, we didn't do the toolbar because it had some significant extra
complexity around overflowing the contents of the menu into the
dropdown. This is really hard to do at render-time with react - you
can't introspect what a component will return to move some of it into an
overflow.
Instead, this diff runs that logic in a `useLayoutEffect` - we render
all the items into both the main toolbar and the overflow menu, then in
the effect (or if the rendered components change) we use CSS to remove
the items we don't need, check which was last active, etc. Originally, I
wasn't really into this approach - but i've actually found it to work
super well and be very reliable.
### Change Type
- [x] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Test the toolbar at many different sizes with many different 'active
tools'
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
Use the Readme and bg color of elements to make it clearer which menu is
being customised.
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
This PR:
- adds the export all menu items to the main menu
- removes the export all menu items from the dotcom menus
- removes the shape menu and reverts several changes from
https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/pull/2782. This was not properly
reviewed (I thought it was a PR about hiding / showing menu items).
- fixes a bug with exporting (exporting JSON was not working when the
user had no selected shapes)
- fixes a bug that would prevent "flip shapes" from appearing in the
menu
- prevents export / copy actions from running if there are no shapes on
the page
- allows export / copy actions to default to all shapes on the page if
no shapes are selected
These changes have not been released in the dotcom yet. There's will be
some thrash in the APIs.
# Menu philosophy
In the menu, the **edit** submenu relates to undo/redo, plus the user's
current selection.
Menu items that relate to specific to certain shapes are hidden when not
available.
Menu items that relate to all shapes are disabled when not available.
<img width="640" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/assets/23072548/e467e6bb-d958-4a9a-ac19-1dada52dcfa6">
### Change Type
- [x] `major` — Bug fix
### Test
- Select no shapes (arrange / flip should not be visible)
- Select one geo shape (arrange / flip should not be visible)
- Select two geo shapes (arrange / flip should be visible)
- Select one draw shape (arrange / flip should not be visible)
### Release Notes
- Revert some changes in the menu.
Before this PR all .md files were targeted by the `.ignore` file, which
has bitten me on a number of occasions since .md files often contain
valuable information (e.g. the vscode extensions docs). This PR
unignores .md files while still ignoring _generated_ .md files like our
changelogs, the api-report files, and the generated docs sections.
Additionally, the `yarn format` and `yarn lint` commands were configured
slightly differently, which was confusing, so I've unified those and
simplified the lint.ts script at the same time.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
This PR does a few things to help with performance:
1. Instead of doing changes on raf we now do them 60 times per second.
This limits the number of updates on high refresh rate screens like the
iPad. With the current code this only applied to the history updates (so
when you subscribed to the updates), but the next point takes this a bit
futher.
2. We now trigger react updates 60 times per second. This is a change in
`useValue` and `useStateTracking` hooks.
3. We now throttle the inputs (like the `pointerMove`) in state nodes.
This means we batch multiple inputs and only apply them at most 60 times
per second.
We had to adjust our own tests to pass after this change so I marked
this as major as it might require the users of the library to do the
same.
Few observations:
- The browser calls the raf callbacks when it can. If it gets
overwhelmed it will call them further and further apart. As things call
down it will start calling them more frequently again. You can clearly
see this in the drawing example. When fps gets to a certain level we
start to get fewer updates, then fps can recover a bit. This makes the
experience quite janky. The updates can be kinda ok one second (dropping
frames, but consistently) and then they can completely stop and you have
to let go of the mouse to make them happen again. With the new logic it
seems everything is a lot more consistent.
- We might look into variable refresh rates to prevent this overtaxing
of the browser. Like when we see that the times between our updates are
getting higher we could make the updates less frequent. If we then see
that they are happening more often we could ramp them back up. I had an
[experiment for this
here](4834863966 (diff-318e71563d7c47173f89ec084ca44417cf70fc72faac85b96f48b856a8aec466L30-L35)).
Few tests below. Used 6x slowdown for these.
# Resizing
### Before
https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/assets/2523721/798a033f-5dfa-419e-9a2d-fd8908272ba0
### After
https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/assets/2523721/45870a0c-c310-4be0-b63c-6c92c20ca037
# Drawing
Comparison is not 100% fair, we don't store the intermediate inputs
right now. That said, tick should still only produce once update so I do
think we can get a sense of the differences.
### Before
https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/assets/2523721/2e8ac8c5-bbdf-484b-bb0c-70c967f4541c
### After
https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/assets/2523721/8f54b7a8-9a0e-4a39-b168-482caceb0149
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [x] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Release Notes
- Improves the performance of rendering.
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
Adds an example of how to add migrations for a custom shape.
closes tld-2246
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
### Release Notes
- Adds a shape with migrations example
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
Describe what your pull request does. If appropriate, add GIFs or images
showing the before and after.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
Look at the revised documentation
### Release Notes
N/A
Two examples:
One in the UI section that shows how to add a tool to the toolbar along
with an icon
One in the shapes and tools section that shows a simple sticker tool
with no child states
I'll go over the copy again before it's merged, but don't want to spend
too long on it right now in case the feeling is that these should both
be a single example.
Next: The [minimal
example](https://tldraw.dev/examples/editor-api/only-editor) is
currently the best example we have of a tool with child states. I think
this should be adapted and copied/moved over to the custom shapes and
tools category.
closes tld-2266
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
### Release Notes
- Adds a simple custom tool example
This PR provides some safe wrappers for local storage calls. Local
storage is not available in all environments (for example, a React
Native web view). The PR also adds an eslint rule preventing direct
calls to local / session storage.
### Change Type
- [x] `patch` — Bug fix
### Release Notes
- Fixes a bug that could cause crashes in React Native webviews.
This PR:
- adds a simple custom shape example
- adds an interactive shape example
- updates editable shape example
closes TLD-2118
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
### Release Notes
- adds a simple custom shape example
- adds an interactive shape example
- updates editable shape example
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
Adds an example of how to use tldraw styles in a custom shape
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
### Release Notes
- shape with tldraw styles example
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
This PR updates our end to end tests so that they check every route in
our examples to ensure that it loads (skipping any routes that don't
features a canvas).
### Change Type
- [x] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
### Test Plan
- [x] End to end tests
This PR adds a custom selection UI example.
It also fixes a bug with pageToScreen and adds a
`getSelectionRotatedScreenBounds` method.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [x] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Release Notes
- Adds selection UI example.
- Adds `Editor.getSelectionRotatedScreenBounds` method
- Fixes a bug with `pageToScreen`.
Rename `@tldraw/tldraw` to just `tldraw`! `@tldraw/tldraw` still exists
as an alias to `tldraw` for folks who are still using that.
### Test Plan
- [x] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- The `@tldraw/tldraw` package has been renamed to `tldraw`. You can
keep using the old version if you want though!
This PR removes code that would add a reference to the editor to the
window. This is a feature that we added very early on during testing,
but which we should have moved out of the library earlier. Adding it
here as one of our last PRs before release.
If you've relied on this, you'll need to update your use of the library
to do it manually:
```ts
<Tldraw onMount={(editor) => {
;(window as any).app = editor
;(window as any).editor = editor
}}/>
```
### Change Type
- [x] `major` — Breaking change
### Release Notes
- Remove `window.editor` and `window.app` references to editor.
A basic test for each of the menu areas
fixes TLD-2251
- [x] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
This PR adds an example that shows you how to make your dialogs pop
outside of the Tldraw component and go fullscreen.
Closes TLD-2191
### Change Type
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Try out the "External dialog" example.
2. Open the keyboard shortcuts dialog (or any dialog).
3. The dialog should be centered in the browser window, not just the
tldraw component.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Dev: Added an example for dialogs that go outside the component.
Handle's days are numbered, and in the line shape we've moved away from
storing `TLHandle` directly. This diff updates the speech bubble shape
to rename the 'handle' prop to 'tail' and make it just be the
coordinates. The handle props are derived at runtime.
### Change Type
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
The log statements in this were confusing me when I was inspecting style
changes the other day because when you changed some value from A
(before) to B (after) it only logged out the A value. I tried
experimenting with logging both A and B but it didn't feel necessary,
switching to only B feels fine.
### Change Type
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
This PR adds an example for how to add external UI components.
It's something that I've been asked for help with in the past, and it's
something I wish more consumers would do when using tldraw inline - it
would help the editor feel less cramped. Therefore, I'd like to have it
is as an example we can point people to.
> Some other context:
> We've talked about giving this sorta thing more first-class support in
the future, eg: with a `useEditorInstance` hook or something.
Closes TLD-2128
### Change Type
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Try out the External UI example.
2. Make sure you can change tool by pressing the toolbar buttons.
3. Make sure you can change tool by pressing keys (eg: d, e)
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Docs: Added external UI example.
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
This PR moves the focus
### Change Type
- [x] `minor`
### Test Plan
1. Select an element.
2. Press the delete quick action menu button.
3. Undo the delete with a keyboard shortcut.
1. Create a geo shape
2. Use the style panel to change the geo type
3. Undo so that it deletes
4. Try to redo
### Release Notes
- [Fix] Keyboard shortcut focus bug
---------
Co-authored-by: David Sheldrick <d.j.sheldrick@gmail.com>
This PR adds E2E tests for the style panel.
It checks that:
- the style panel opens and closes as expected on mobile
- the style panel button is disabled for the eraser tool on mobile
- selecting a style hints the button
- changing a style changes the appearance of the shape
- It also moves a test from the toolbar tests that checks the correct
styles are exposed for the right tools
fixes tld-2222
- [x] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
### Release Notes
- Add style panel E2E tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
This PR adds a custom static assets example.
It also:
- extracts preloadFont into a async function to make custom preloading
easier
- accounts for file-based formats
### Change Type
- [x] `minor` — New feature
### Test Plan
1. Test the example.
### Release Notes
- Docs, added custom static assets example.
This PR adds an example of how to use the new getBoundsSnapGeometry
method to get custom snapping behaviour on your shapes.
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
### Release Notes
- Adds a custom bounds snapping shape
This PR fixes and improves the appearance on dialogs on small tldraw
components, eg: Inline components.
Fixes TLD-2232
Marking as minor instead of patch because it adds a new prop to
`TldrawUiKbd`.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [x] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Open the "Inset editor" example.
2. Open the keyboard shortcuts dialog.
3. Shrink the window down.
4. Make sure the dialog remains visible at all window sizes.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Dev: Made default dialogs work better when used in small components.
Closes#2800
This PR makes it so that `check-scripts` will error out if you forget to
add a "references" entry to a tsconfig file when adding an internal
dependency in our monorepo.
If these project references are missed it can prevent TS from
building/rebuilding things when they need to be built/rebuilt.
### Change Type
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
This PR fixes the custom keyboard shortcut dialog example.
Previously, the custom menu item wasn't appearing in the menu because it
didn't have a shortcut associated with it. (we filter out any actions
without one).
I fixed it by adding a smiley face. I tried adding a real shortcut, but
I think it made the example too complicated. So I decided on a fake
smiley face instead! After all, the example is demonstrating how to
customise the UI, not how to add an action.
### Change Type
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Open the custom keyboard shortcuts dialog example.
2. Open the keyboard shortcuts menu.
3. Check that it says "Like my posts" in the dialog.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Docs: Fixed custom keyboard shortcut dialog example.
This PR converts all example titles and categories to sentence case, to
make them consistent with our UI and the other examples.
### Change Type
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Look at the examples app.
2. Check that all the titles of examples make you feel calm and good
inside.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Docs: Made the examples titles sentence case.
This PR adds a validation mode whereby previous known-to-be-valid values
can be used to speed up the validation process itself. At the same time
it enables us to do fine-grained equality checking on records much more
quickly than by using something like lodash isEqual, and using that we
can prevent triggering effects for record updates that don't actually
alter any values in the store.
Here's some preliminary perf testing of average time spent in
`store.put()` during some common interactions
| task | before (ms) | after (ms) |
| ---- | ---- | ---- |
| drawing lines | 0.0403 | 0.0214 |
| drawing boxes | 0.0408 | 0.0348 |
| translating lines | 0.0352 | 0.0042 |
| translating boxes | 0.0051 | 0.0032 |
| rotating lines | 0.0312 | 0.0065 |
| rotating boxes | 0.0053 | 0.0035 |
| brush selecting boxes | 0.0200 | 0.0232 |
| traversal with shapes | 0.0130 | 0.0108 |
| traversal without shapes | 0.0201 | 0.0173 |
**traversal** means moving the camera and pointer around the canvas
#### Discussion
At the scale of hundredths of a millisecond these .put operations are so
fast that even if they became literally instantaneous the change would
not be human perceptible. That said, there is an overall marked
improvement here. Especially for dealing with draw shapes.
These figures are also mostly in line with expectations, aside from a
couple of things:
- I don't understand why the `brush selecting boxes` task got slower
after the change.
- I don't understand why the `traversal` tasks are slower than the
`translating boxes` task, both before and after. I would expect that
.putting shape records would be much slower than .putting pointer/camera
records (since the latter have fewer and simpler properties)
### Change Type
- [x] `patch` — Bug fix
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
This PR adds an example for an editable shape. I wanted to show the
onEditEnd method so I just made the shape do a little wiggle.
Closes#2592
### Change Type
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
### Release Notes
- Adds an editable shape example
This one is a roundup of superficial changes, apologies for having them
in a single PR.
This PR:
- does some chair re-arranging for one of our hotter paths related to
updating shapes
- changes our type exports for editor components
- adds shape indicator to editor components
- moves canvas to be an editor component
- fixes a CSS bug with hinted buttons
- fixes CSS bugs with the menus
- fixes bad imports in examples
### Change Type
- [x] `major`
Adds the ability to change document names in the top center part of the
UI. This mostly brings back the functionality we already had in the
past.
This is basically a port of what @SomeHats did a while back. I changed
the dropdown options and removed some of the things (we are not dealing
with network requests directly so some of that logic did not apply any
longer). We did have autosave back then, not sure if we want to bring
that back?
Changes the `exportAs` api, thus braking.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [x] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Top center should now show a new UI element. It has a dropdown with a
few actions.
2. Double clicking the name should also start editing it.
3. The name should also be respected when exporting things. Not if you
select some shapes or a frame. In that case we still use the old names.
But if you don't have anything selected and then export / save a project
it should have the document name.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Allow users to name their documents.
fix typo in examples
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Release Notes
- fix typo in examples
This PR adds some e2e tests for the toolbar.
Fixtures have been set up for the toolbar and style panel, and are
fairly barebones at the moment. Eventually each menu should have a
fixture associated with it, and all tests will use the class defined in
the fixtures file.
### Change Type
- [x] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
### Release Notes
- Add e2e tests for the toolbar
This PR adds the `TldrawImage` component that displays a tldraw snapshot
as an SVG image.
## Why
We've seen requests for this kind of thing from users. eg: GitBook, and
on discord:
<img width="710" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/assets/15892272/3d3a3e9d-66b9-42e7-81de-a70aa7165bdc">
The component provides a way to do that.
This PR also untangles various bits of editor state from image
exporting, which makes it easier for library users to export images more
agnostically. (ie: they can now export any shapes on any page in any
theme. previously, they had to change the user's state to do that).
## What else
- This PR also adds an **Image snapshot** example to demonstrate the new
component.
- We now pass an `isDarkMode` property to the `toSvg` method (inside the
`ctx` argument). This means that `toSvg` doesn't have to rely on editor
state anymore. I updated all our `toSvg` methods to use it.
- See code comments for more info.
## Any issues?
When you toggle to editing mode in the new example, text measurements
are initially wrong (until you edit the size of a text shape). Click on
the text shape to see how its indicator is wrong. Not sure why this is,
or if it's even related. Does it ring a bell with anyone? If not, I'll
take a closer look. (fixed, see comments --steve)
## Future work
Now that we've untangled image exporting from editor state, we could
expose some more helpful helpers for making this easier.
Fixes tld-2122
### Change Type
- [x] `minor` — New feature
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Open the **Image snapshot** example.
2. Try editing the image, saving the image, and making sure the image
updates.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Dev: Added the `TldrawImage` component.
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
no tests
### Release Notes
- Fixed a typo in the description in the hosted-images example.
This PR:
- replaces the `shareZone` prop with `SharePanel` component
- replaces the `topZone` prop with `TopPanel` components
- replaces the `Button` component with `TldrawUiButton` and
subcomponents
- adds `TldrawUi` prefix to our primitives
- fixes a couple of bugs with the components
### Change Type
- [x] `major` — Breaking change
This PR refactors our menu systems and provides an interface to hide or
replace individual user interface elements.
# Background
Previously, we've had two types of overrides:
- "schema" overrides that would allow insertion or replacement of items
in the different menus
- "component" overrides that would replace components in the editor's
user interface
This PR is an attempt to unify the two and to provide for additional
cases where the "schema-based" user interface had begun to break down.
# Approach
This PR makes no attempt to change the `actions` or `tools`
overrides—the current system seems to be correct for those because they
are not reactive. The challenge with the other ui schemas is that they
_are_ reactive, and thus the overrides both need to a) be fed in from
outside of the editor as props, and b) react to changes from the editor,
which is an impossible situation.
The new approach is to use React to declare menu items. (Surprise!)
```tsx
function CustomHelpMenuContent() {
return (
<>
<DefaultHelpMenuContent />
<TldrawUiMenuGroup id="custom stuff">
<TldrawUiMenuItem
id="about"
label="Like my posts"
icon="external-link"
readonlyOk
onSelect={() => {
window.open('https://x.com/tldraw', '_blank')
}}
/>
</TldrawUiMenuGroup>
</>
)
}
const components: TLComponents = {
HelpMenuContent: CustomHelpMenuContent,
}
export default function CustomHelpMenuContentExample() {
return (
<div className="tldraw__editor">
<Tldraw components={components} />
</div>
)
}
```
We use a `components` prop with the combined editor and ui components.
- [ ] Create a "layout" component?
- [ ] Make UI components more isolated? If possible, they shouldn't
depend on styles outside of themselves, so that they can be used in
other layouts. Maybe we wait on this because I'm feeling a slippery
slope toward presumptions about configurability.
- [ ] OTOH maybe we go hard and consider these things as separate
components, even packages, with their own interfaces for customizability
/ configurability, just go all the way with it, and see what that looks
like.
# Pros
Top line: you can customize tldraw's user interface in a MUCH more
granular / powerful way than before.
It solves a case where menu items could not be made stateful from
outside of the editor context, and provides the option to do things in
the menus that we couldn't allow previously with the "schema-based"
approach.
It also may (who knows) be more performant because we can locate the
state inside of the components for individual buttons and groups,
instead of all at the top level above the "schema". Because items /
groups decide their own state, we don't have to have big checks on how
many items are selected, or whether we have a flippable state. Items and
groups themselves are allowed to re-build as part of the regular React
lifecycle. Menus aren't constantly being rebuilt, if that were ever an
issue.
Menu items can be shared between different menu types. We'll are
sometimes able to re-use items between, for example, the menu and the
context menu and the actions menu.
Our overrides no longer mutate anything, so there's less weird searching
and finding.
# Cons
This approach can make customization menu contents significantly more
complex, as an end user would need to re-declare most of a menu in order
to make any change to it. Luckily a user can add things to the top or
bottom of the context menu fairly easily. (And who knows, folks may
actually want to do deep customization, and this allows for it.)
It's more code. We are shipping more react components, basically one for
each menu item / group.
Currently this PR does not export the subcomponents, i.e. menu items. If
we do want to export these, then heaven help us, it's going to be a
_lot_ of exports.
# Progress
- [x] Context menu
- [x] Main menu
- [x] Zoom menu
- [x] Help menu
- [x] Actions menu
- [x] Keyboard shortcuts menu
- [x] Quick actions in main menu? (new)
- [x] Helper buttons? (new)
- [x] Debug Menu
And potentially
- [x] Toolbar
- [x] Style menu
- [ ] Share zone
- [x] Navigation zone
- [ ] Other zones
### Change Type
- [x] `major` — Breaking change
### Test Plan
1. use the context menu
2. use the custom context menu example
3. use cursor chat in the context menu
- [x] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
(pending landing on: "Going to wait to land this one until the Google
SEO 'soft 404' validation finishes. I want to make sure we're testing
separate things.")
- removes Loading text
- adds sitemap to try to get Google to play nice
### Change Type
- [x] `patch` — Bug fix
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
Currently, we type our fractional index keys as `string` and don't have
any validation for them. I'm touching some of this code for my work on
line handles and wanted to change that:
- fractional indexes are now `IndexKey`s, not `string`s. `IndexKey`s
have a brand property so can't be used interchangeably with strings
(like our IDs)
- There's a new `T.indexKey` validator which we can use in our
validations to make sure we don't end up with nonsense keys.
This PR is part of a series - please don't merge it until the things
before it have landed!
1. #2827 (you are here)
2. #2831
3. #2793
4. #2841
5. #2845
### Change Type
- [x] `patch` — Bug fix
### Test Plan
1. Mostly relying on unit & end to end tests here - no user facing
changes.
- [x] Unit Tests
Fixes#2826, extracted from #2680
The problem is that we had two different articles whose ids were being
derived as `persistence`, the `persistence.mdx` file and the
`persistence/` example.
I've
1. Made it an error for two articles to have the same id
2. Renamed the `persistence/` article to `local-storage` since that's
the API it's using.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
3.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
This PR fixes the overlays / custom brush example
### Change Type
- [x] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
This PR changes the way that viewport bounds are calculated by using the
canvas element as the source of truth, rather than the container. This
allows for cases where the canvas is not the same dimensions as the
component. (Given the way our UI and context works, there are cases
where this is desired, i.e. toolbars and other items overlaid on top of
the canvas area).
The editor's `getContainer` is now only used for the text measurement.
It would be good to get that out somehow.
# Pros
We can inset the canvas
# Cons
We can no longer imperatively call `updateScreenBounds`, as we need to
provide those bounds externally.
### Change Type
- [x] `major` — Breaking change
### Test Plan
1. Use the examples, including the new inset canvas example.
- [x] Unit Tests
### Release Notes
- Changes the source of truth for the viewport page bounds to be the
canvas instead.
Previously, our UI changed appearance based on your browser's **window
size**.
This PR makes it change appearance based on tldraw's **component size**
instead.
It makes the UI behave as we intend in small inline components.
See the **Inline component** example for a comparison of different
screen sizes.
See code comments for more info.
### Change Type
- [x] `patch` — Bug fix
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Open the inline component example.
2. Gradually change the width of the browser window.
3. The UI of the components shouldn't change when you do this.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Dev: Fixed the default tldraw UI not matching the size of the
component.
This PR changes the direction of the actions menu popover when it's at
the bottom of the screen.
It's now consistent with all other menu dropdowns (or dropups?).
This PR also adds an example that demonstrates the Tldraw component at
various different size points. It was helpful when trying out this
change. And I'm using it to demonstrate more incoming changes.
### Change Type
- [x] `patch` — Bug fix
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Open the inline example.
2. Click the actions overflow button.
3. Make sure it appears above the button, instead of below.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Dev: Fixed the actions menu opening in the wrong direction.
Biome as it is now didn't work out for us 😢
Summary for posterity:
* it IS much, much faster, fast enough to skip any sort of caching
* we couldn't fully replace Prettier just yet. We use Prettier
programmatically to format code in docs, and Biome's JS interface is
officially alpha and [had legacy peer deps
set](https://github.com/biomejs/biome/pull/1756) (which would fail our
CI build as we don't allow installation warnings)
* ternary formatting differs from Prettier, leading to a large diff
https://github.com/biomejs/biome/issues/1661
* import sorting differs from Prettier's
`prettier-plugin-organize-imports`, making the diff even bigger
* the deal breaker is a multi-second delay on saving large files (for us
it's
[Editor.ts](https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/blob/main/packages/editor/src/lib/editor/Editor.ts))
in VSCode when import sorting is enabled. There is a seemingly relevant
Biome issue where I posted a small summary of our findings:
https://github.com/biomejs/biome/issues/1569#issuecomment-1930411623
Further actions:
* reevaluate in a few months as Biome matures
### Change Type
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package
Taking the opportunity for some last-minute low-consequence breaking
changes before 2.0, this diff does some prep work for adding a new
snapping API by making the distinction between the two types of snapping
a bit clearer and cleaning up some naming.
- `SnapManager` has had most of the actual snapping logic moved into two
properties: `shapeBounds` (for snapping shape bounds on translate and
resize) and `handles` (for snapping handles)
- `SnapLine`s are renamed to `SnapIndicator`s. The 'line' name was a bit
confusing because not all of these indicators are lines (the new vertex
snap type will be a single point)
I'm not too worried about this being a breaking change as it touches an
area of the API that I'd be very surprised if more than a couple of
people were using.
### Change Type
- [x] `major` — Breaking change
### Test Plan
- No user-facing changes.
### Release Notes
- `SnapLine`s are now called `SnapIndicator`s
- Snapping methods moved from `editor.snaps` to
`editor.snaps.shapeBounds` and `editor.snaps.handles` depending on the
type of snapping you're trying to do.
Biome seems to be MUCH faster than Prettier. Unfortunately, it
introduces some formatting changes around the ternary operator, so we
have to update files in the repo. To make revert easier if we need it,
the change is split into two PRs. This PR introduces a Biome CI check
and reformats all files accordingly.
## Change Type
- [x] `minor` — New feature
This PR starts putting in place the high-level changes we want to make
to the docs site.
- It makes separate sections for Reference and Examples and Community.
- Gets rid of the secondary sidebar and integrates it into the main
sidebar.
- Groups the reference articles by type.
- Pulls in the examples alongside code and a live playground so people
don't have to visit examples.tldraw.com separately.
<img width="1458" alt="Screenshot 2024-01-30 at 09 43 46"
src="https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/assets/469604/4f5aa339-3a69-4d9b-9b9f-dfdddea623e8">
Again, this is the top-level changes and there's more to be done for the
next PR(s):
- create quick start page
- clean up installation page
- add accordion to Examples page prbly
- put fun stuff in header (from footer)
- landing page
- something for landing page of API
- search cmd-k and border
- cleanup _sidebarReferenceContentLinks
- external links _blank
- address potential skew issue with code examples
- have a link to other examples (next.js, etc.)
### Change Type
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
### Test Plan
1. Make sure examples work!
### Release Notes
- Rework our docs site to pull together the examples app and reference
section more cohesively.
---------
Co-authored-by: Taha <98838967+Taha-Hassan-Git@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Mitja Bezenšek <mitja.bezensek@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: alex <alex@dytry.ch>
Co-authored-by: Lu Wilson <l2wilson94@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Dan Groshev <git@dgroshev.com>
This PR removes the examples app landing page, the home route now shows
the basic example.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Release Notes
- Remove examples app landing page
This PR adds collapsible groups to the examples app.
it's not finished, but I'd like a review before continuing as I've made
a few decisions I'd like feedback on. I'd like to make a separate issue
for abstracting the accordion component, as I wasn't sure how I would do
it and I thought it would be best to prioritise the functionality first.
Especially considering there are more pressing issues to be getting on
with.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Release Notes
- Add collapsible categories to the examples app
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
Occasionally the auto-built items, such as Sections.json, will be
flagged as having changes in a commit. This is because we generate that
file using spaces but our formatting uses tabs.
This PR changes all JSON.stringify({}, null, 2) to JSON.stringify({},
null, '\t'). Problem solved!
### Change Type
- [x] `patch` — Bug fix
Adds positional keyboard shortcuts to the toolbar. Use the 1, 2, 3, 4
etc keys to activate the corresponding tool on the toolbar.
### Change Type
- [x] `minor` — New feature
### Test Plan
1. Use the number keys to activate toolbar items.
- [x] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- You can now use the number keys to select the corresponding tool from
the toolbar
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
This PR adds an issue template to request an example on the repo. And
adds a button to the examples app to request an example.
I've added a blue background to the view code button to distinguish it
from the request example. I think it makes the most sense as our primary
button for the page.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Release Notes
- Add a button to request an example to the examples app
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
This PR should make the examples page copy clearer:
1. Moved the examples app copy above the framework specific and yjs
copy, as it's more likely to be what the user is looking for.
2. Moved the codesandbox below the copy, user no longer needs to scroll
to see most of the text.
3. Gives more hints about what can be found in the examples app and also
highlights that running it locally is the better experience.
4. Added some clarification on the relationship between the
framework-specific examples/yjs example and the examples app
5. Updates the tldraw repo README accordingly.
6. Removes (development) from the Basic example.
Next steps:
- The codesandbox
- quite noisy, would be good to hide the navigation
- doesn't reliably show the code and implementation at the same time
- Should stack vertically on small screens
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Release Notes
- Update examples copy and tldraw README
This PR restores the vercel.json files in the examples/dotcom
directories.
### Change Type
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
Adds an FPS counter to detect when there's a UI slowdown.
(btw, drive-by typo fix for a file)
https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/assets/469604/b83d4b10-35d9-4584-af46-c63b5cc107ac
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [x] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Adds FPS counter to debug panel.
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
This adds the ability to drag the label on an arrow to a different
location within the line segment/arc.
https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/assets/469604/dbd2ee35-bebc-48d6-b8ee-fcf12ce91fa5
- A lot of the complexity lay in ensuring a fixed distance from the ends
of the arrowheads.
- I added a new type of handle `text-adjust` that makes the text box the
very handle itself.
- I added a `ARROW_HANDLES` enum - we should use more enums!
- The bulk of the changes are in ArrowShapeUtil — check that out in
particular obviously :)
Along the way, I tried to improve a couple spots as I touched them:
- added some more documentation to Vec.ts because some of the functions
in there were obscure/new to me. (at least the naming, hah)
- added `getPointOnCircle` which was being done in a couple places
independently and refactored those places.
### Questions
- the `getPointOnCircle` API changed. Is this considered breaking and/or
should I leave the signature the same? Wasn't sure if it was a big deal
or not.
- I made `labelPosition` in the schema always but I guess it could have
been optional? Lemme know if there's a preference.
- Any feedback on tests? Happy to expand those if necessary.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [x] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. For arrow in [straightArrow, curvedArrow] test the following:
a. Label in the middle
b. Label at both ends of the arrow
c. Test arrows in different directions
d. Rotating the endpoints and seeing that the label stays at the end of
the arrow at a fixed width.
e. Test different stroke widths.
f. Test with different arrowheads.
2. Also, test arcs that are more circle like than arc-like.
- [x] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Adds ability to change label position on arrows.
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: alex <alex@dytry.ch>
Adds a context toolbar example which allows you to change shape's size.
https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/assets/2523721/527af280-af19-4142-ac2e-46dd07559d14
Works when one or more shapes (which support size property) are
selected.
Solves #2549
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Release Notes
- Add context toolbar example.
---------
Co-authored-by: Taha <98838967+Taha-Hassan-Git@users.noreply.github.com>
Also tweaks the colours of menus in dark mode to have a little higher
contrast. Fixed#2493
### Change Type
- [x] `patch` — Bug fix
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
---------
Co-authored-by: huppy-bot[bot] <128400622+huppy-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR adds an example for overriding and adding keyboard shortcuts.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Add keyboard shortcuts example
This PR adds the docs app back into the tldraw monorepo.
## Deploying
We'll want to update our deploy script to update the SOURCE_SHA to the
newest release sha... and then deploy the docs pulling api.json files
from that release. We _could_ update the docs on every push to main, but
we don't have to unless something has changed. Right now there's no
automated deployments from this repo.
## Side effects
To make this one work, I needed to update the lock file. This might be
ok (new year new lock file), and everything builds as expected, though
we may want to spend some time with our scripts to be sure that things
are all good.
I also updated our prettier installation, which decided to add trailing
commas to every generic type. Which is, I suppose, [correct
behavior](https://github.com/prettier/prettier-vscode/issues/955)? But
that caused diffs in every file, which is unfortunate.
### Change Type
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
Mildly spicy take, should we call this the user presence example if it
isn't an example of how to implement user presence? Presence record
example is closer to what it is.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- annotate user presence example and rename to presence-record
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
I've changed this example a little bit to add some hints to the user,
similar to the only-editor example. I also removed snaplines: null from
the components object because it seemed a bit unnecessary.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- annotate onthecanvas example
annotate snapshot example
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- annotate snapshot example
The minimal example code made reference to a delete functionality that
wasn't working. I managed to get it working again and updated the
background component accordingly. I'm not sure of the reason to check
for a hovered shape before checking if you hit a shape, so I took that
part out.
There was also a check to see if the target was a 'selection' that
didn't seem to ever fire, so I removed that as the selection behaviour
worked fine.
The main thing is the annotations though.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Fix and annotate minimal example
Annotate zones example. I changed this one a little bit, I thought it
made more sense for both the sharezone and topzone to look similar to
each other, rather than importing the offline indicator.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- annotate zones example
annotate ui events example
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- annotate ui events example
Annotate shape meta data example
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Annotate shape meta data example
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
Annotate example for using Tldraw component in a scrollable container
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Annotate example for using Tldraw component in a scrollable container
Annotate example for making editor read-only
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Annotate example for making editor read-only
Fix typos and add comments for persistence example
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Fix typos and add comments for persistence example
Annotates the external sources example with extra info
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Adds annotation to the external sources example.
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
annotate multiple example
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- annotate multiple example
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Ruiz <steveruizok@gmail.com>
annotate force mobile example
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [x] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- annotate force mobile example
