this PR puts sync stuff in the bemo worker, and sets up a temporary
dev-only page in dotcom for testing bemo stuff
### Change type
- [ ] `bugfix`
- [ ] `improvement`
- [x] `feature`
- [ ] `api`
- [ ] `other`
### Test plan
1. Create a shape...
2.
- [ ] Unit tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release notes
- Fixed a bug with...
Uploads all the folders inside `./assets` folder to a new R2 bucket
called `cdn`. Uses the package version as the prefix, so that we can
host multiple versions of the assets.
### Change Type
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Scope' label ❗️ -->
- [ ] `sdk` — Changes the tldraw SDK
- [ ] `dotcom` — Changes the tldraw.com web app
- [ ] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
- [ ] `vs code` — Changes to the vscode plugin
- [x] `internal` — Does not affect user-facing stuff
<!-- ❗ Please select a 'Type' label ❗️ -->
- [ ] `bugfix` — Bug fix
- [ ] `feature` — New feature
- [ ] `improvement` — Improving existing features
- [ ] `chore` — Updating dependencies, other boring stuff
- [ ] `galaxy brain` — Architectural changes
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code
- [x] `tools` — Changes to infrastructure, CI, internal scripts,
debugging tools, etc.
- [ ] `dunno` — I don't know
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Upload our static assets (fonts, icons, embed-icons, translations) to
a R2 bucket so that we can move away from using unpkg and start using
our own cdn.
This PR makes it so that our docs deployment process is tied to, and
mirrors, the npm deployment process.
From here on:
- Commits to main get deployed to staging.tldraw.dev
- Commits to a special protected branch called `docs-production` get
deployed to www.tldraw.dev
- Whenever we create a new npm 'latest' release we reset the HEAD of
docs-production to point to the tagged commit for that release.
- If we make a docs change that we want to appear on tldraw.dev ASAP
without waiting for the next npm release, we'll have to follow the same
process as for creating a patch release i.e merge a cherry-pick PR
targeting the latest release branch e.g. `v2.0.x`. This will not cause
another npm patch release unless the cherry-picked changes touch source
files, e.g. updating TSDoc comments.
### Change Type
- [x] `docs` — Changes to the documentation, examples, or templates.
- [x] `tools` — Changes to infrastructure, CI, internal scripts,
debugging tools, etc.
This PR switches up how PR labels are validated to allow for more
freeform label tweaking in the future. Basically **huppy will now only
check that your PR is labelled, it doesn't care how it's labelled**. I
also updated the PR template with a new labelling scheme that we can
tweak over time.
So before Huppy bot had to know about the specific set of allowed
labels, and now as long as the label exists you're allowed to add it.
So to add a new label to the PR template, just create the label and then
add an option for it in the .md file.
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
This PR adds tooling to enable a PR-based workflow for publishing
'patch' releases.
### How releases currently work
Quick recap of how the 'major' and 'minor' releases work:
- You trigger them manually in the github actions UI
- It only works on the `main` branch.
- You select a mode: `'major'`, `'minor'`, or `'override'` with a
specific version. The override option is mainly for transitioning in and
out of prerelease mode, but potentially also skipping unlucky numbers
like 13 if you're feeling superstitious 🧙🏼
- It bumps the version numbers in the `package.json` and `version.ts`
files.
- It compiles a changelog based on descriptions/titles from all the PRs
that have gone in to `main`.
- It tags the commit with the version number e.g. `v2.0.0` and pushes
all the changes made to `main` (i.e. changelogs, version bumps and the
tag)
- It creates a github release, e.g.
https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/releases/tag/v2.0.0
- It deploys the packages to npm
- It tells huppy bot about the release (for now-defunct purposes, we can
remove that code later)
- It triggers the template repo update workflow
### Introducing: Release Branches
This PR adds one step into the above process: creating a 'release'
branch. e.g. if it publishes a new version tagged `v2.1.0` it will also
create a branch named `v2.1.x`.
These branches are protected in the following ways:
- Only huppy bot can create or delete them (ad-hoc admin overrides are,
of course, still doable should the need arise)
- Like `main` they can only be updated via pull request.
The process to create a patch release becomes simple:
1. Checkout the `v<major>.<minor>.x` branch you want to create a patch
release for. e.g.
git fetch && git checkout v2.1.x
4. Branch off, e.g.
git checkout -b david/my-patch-release
6. Cherry-pick any commits you need from `main` into your branch,
resolving any conflicts if they arise. **important**: don't do new work
here because it won't be merged back into `main` automatically. Fix the
thing in `main` first and then cherry-pick, unless you're in a big rush
or whatever. e.g.
git cherry-pick abdeaf234 cde234d09 ab23af287
7. Push your new branch to github as normal and make a PR targeting the
`v<major>.<minor>.x` branch.
8. Merge it.
Congratulations, you just triggered a patch release build.
### What happens (differently) during a patch release build.
⚡ A key thing to understand here is that **this script allows us to
deploy patch versions of _older_ major/minor releases**. This will
happen when we have customers pinned to older versions and they need a
quick bugfix but don't have time to upgrade to the latest due to some
breaking change. This will also happen if we ever adopt a kind of 'LTS'
release model.
With that said, here's how things go down differently:
- Firstly, the build happens automatically after the PR is merged, and
you don't select 'major' or 'minor' or anything, it just does its thing.
- It bumps the version numbers in the `package.json` files and the
`version.ts` files but these changes stay within the release branch,
they don't get propagated to `main` (nor should they).
- It compiles a changelog entry featuring just your one PR's
description/title, and also pushes this to the release branch (but not
`main`).
- It still tags the commit and creates a github release as normal.
- It still deploys the packages to npm (obvs). HOWEVER it only uses the
`latest` tag if this will indeed be the latest version of the public
packages. Otherwise, if we're patching an older release, it uses the
`revision` tag. Unfortunately it doesn't seem to be an option to deploy
with _no_ tag, but using `revision` still allows version strings like
`~2.0.0` to capture subsequent patch releases like `2.0.3`.
- Similarly it _only_ notifies huppy bot and _only_ triggers the
template repo update if the version being deployed is actually the
latest version.
I'm going to merge this now to test it out but I'd still appreciate
reviews.
follow up to #3009
the versions.ts files were not being updated since things had been added
and moved around
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
follow up to #2998
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
Gonna merge in a sneaky dry run mode to test the args parsing etc
### Change Type
- [ ] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Add a step-by-step description of how to test your PR here.
2.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Add a brief release note for your PR here.
Biome as it is now didn't work out for us 😢
Summary for posterity:
* it IS much, much faster, fast enough to skip any sort of caching
* we couldn't fully replace Prettier just yet. We use Prettier
programmatically to format code in docs, and Biome's JS interface is
officially alpha and [had legacy peer deps
set](https://github.com/biomejs/biome/pull/1756) (which would fail our
CI build as we don't allow installation warnings)
* ternary formatting differs from Prettier, leading to a large diff
https://github.com/biomejs/biome/issues/1661
* import sorting differs from Prettier's
`prettier-plugin-organize-imports`, making the diff even bigger
* the deal breaker is a multi-second delay on saving large files (for us
it's
[Editor.ts](https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/blob/main/packages/editor/src/lib/editor/Editor.ts))
in VSCode when import sorting is enabled. There is a seemingly relevant
Biome issue where I posted a small summary of our findings:
https://github.com/biomejs/biome/issues/1569#issuecomment-1930411623
Further actions:
* reevaluate in a few months as Biome matures
### Change Type
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package
Biome seems to be MUCH faster than Prettier. Unfortunately, it
introduces some formatting changes around the ternary operator, so we
have to update files in the repo. To make revert easier if we need it,
the change is split into two PRs. This PR introduces a Biome CI check
and reformats all files accordingly.
## Change Type
- [x] `minor` — New feature
This PR moves the tldraw.com app into the public repo.
### Change Type
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
---------
Co-authored-by: Dan Groshev <git@dgroshev.com>
Co-authored-by: alex <alex@dytry.ch>
This PR adds the docs app back into the tldraw monorepo.
## Deploying
We'll want to update our deploy script to update the SOURCE_SHA to the
newest release sha... and then deploy the docs pulling api.json files
from that release. We _could_ update the docs on every push to main, but
we don't have to unless something has changed. Right now there's no
automated deployments from this repo.
## Side effects
To make this one work, I needed to update the lock file. This might be
ok (new year new lock file), and everything builds as expected, though
we may want to spend some time with our scripts to be sure that things
are all good.
I also updated our prettier installation, which decided to add trailing
commas to every generic type. Which is, I suppose, [correct
behavior](https://github.com/prettier/prettier-vscode/issues/955)? But
that caused diffs in every file, which is unfortunate.
### Change Type
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
Follow up to https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/pull/2439. Should fix the
publishing script so that the next time we run it we don't run in the
the same issue.
We could also move the file directly to the `src` dir, but it seems
since only `ui` uses the version it was nested under the `ui` dir 🤷
### Change Type
- [x] `patch` — Bug fix
- [ ] `minor` — New feature
- [ ] `major` — Breaking change
- [ ] `dependencies` — Changes to package dependencies[^1]
- [ ] `documentation` — Changes to the documentation only[^2]
- [ ] `tests` — Changes to any test code only[^2]
- [ ] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package[^2]
- [ ] I don't know
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
---------
Co-authored-by: David Sheldrick <d.j.sheldrick@gmail.com>
### Change Type
- [x] `minor` — New feature
[^1]: publishes a `patch` release, for devDependencies use `internal`
[^2]: will not publish a new version
### Test Plan
1. Make some cloud shapes, try different sizes, colors, fills.
2. Export cloud shapes to images.
- [ ] Unit Tests
- [ ] End to end tests
### Release Notes
- Adds a cloud shape.
This PR replaces our `console.log` with `nicelog` so that I can more
easily grep for errant console.logs.
### Change Type
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package (will not publish a new version)
remove some stray tldraw-lite references
### Change Type
- [x] `internal` — Any other changes that don't affect the published
package (will not publish a new version)
Automated package publish had gotten broken because we lost all our git
tags/releases. We fixed that, but also:
* made releases come from huppy instead of david
* swtiched from node's `execSync` to our `exec` for more debuggable
output
* cleaned up some of the scripts a little
this diff has a lot of whitespace changes so you're best off reviewing
it with whitespace changes hidden:
https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw/pull/1338/files?diff=split&w=1
