PrivateCoffee/element-web
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 3

Set NODE_ENV in a different way

Browse source 
With the approach in https://github.com/vector-im/element-web/pull/16969,
Webpack seems to sometimes do what we want, sometimes not... I haven't quite
worked out why. Perhaps there's some conflict or race in Webpack's defaults...?

This new approach seems to work as expected when running
`./scripts/ci_package.sh`, which matches what development deployments are doing.
This commit is contained in:
J. Ryan Stinnett 2021-04-19 15:49:05 +01:00
parent 14c23f1387
commit 53f9895901
1 changed files with 6 additions and 8 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

14
webpack.config.js
View file

@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ const additionalPlugins = [
];
module.exports = (env, argv) => {
let nodeEnv = argv.mode;
if (process.env.CI_PACKAGE) {
// Don't run minification for CI builds (this is only set for runs on develop)
// We override this via environment variable to avoid duplicating the scripts
@ -24,14 +25,7 @@ module.exports = (env, argv) => {
// when working on the app but adds significant runtime overhead
// We want to use the React production build but not compile the whole
// application to productions standards
additionalPlugins.concat([
new webpack.EnvironmentPlugin({
"NODE_ENV": "production",
}),
new webpack.DefinePlugin({
"process.env.NODE_ENV": "production",
}),
]);
nodeEnv = "production";
}
const development = {};
@ -94,6 +88,10 @@ module.exports = (env, argv) => {
// we use a CSS optimizer too and need to manage it ourselves.
minimize: argv.mode === 'production',
minimizer: argv.mode === 'production' ? [new TerserPlugin({}), new OptimizeCSSAssetsPlugin({})] : [],
// Set the value of `process.env.NODE_ENV` for libraries like React
// See also https://v4.webpack.js.org/configuration/optimization/#optimizationnodeenv
nodeEnv,
},
resolve: {