openwrtv4/target/linux/ramips/dts/AWM003-EVB.dts
John Crispin 1a392636a5 ramips: use consistent naming scheme for LEDs
The upstream LED naming convention is "device:color:led-name", but it seems that many of supported boards in OpenWrt don't follow this approach.
The following patch fixes this inconsistency in dts{,i} files and updates base-files scripts for ramips target:
 * fixes wrong indentation
 * keeps case statements structure in same convention as in other scripts (no empty line after ";;", no indentation for case...esac body)
 * fixes wrong LED names for some of boards (makes them the same as in dts{,i} files)
 * combines boards with same configuration (ex. set_wifi_led "rt2800pci-phy0::radio" in 01_leds)

Signed-off-by: Piotr Dymacz <pepe2k@gmail.com>

SVN-Revision: 46664
2015-08-17 06:24:34 +00:00

68 lines
1,022 B
Text

/dts-v1/;
/include/ "AWM002-8M.dtsi"
/ {
compatible = "AWM003", "ralink,rt5350-soc";
model = "AsiaRF AWM003 EVB";
memory@0 {
device_type = "memory";
reg = <0x0 0x4000000>;
};
palmbus@10000000 {
spi@b00 {
m25p80@0 {
compatible = "mx25l6405d";
linux,modalias = "m25p80", "mx25l6405d";
};
};
};
ethernet@10100000 {
mtd-mac-address = <&factory 0x28>;
};
wmac@10180000 {
ralink,mtd-eeprom = <&factory 0>;
};
gpio-leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
tx {
label = "awm003-evb:green:tx";
gpios = <&gpio0 15 1>;
};
rx {
label = "awm003-evb:green:rx";
gpios = <&gpio0 16 1>;
};
wps {
label = "awm003-evb:green:wps";
gpios = <&gpio0 21 1>;
};
};
gpio-keys-polled {
compatible = "gpio-keys-polled";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
poll-interval = <20>;
reset_wps {
label = "reset_wps";
gpios = <&gpio0 0 1>;
linux,code = <0x198>;
};
mode {
label = "mode";
gpios = <&gpio0 20 1>;
linux,code = <0x32>;
};
};
};