17afb853ee
also refresh generic patches for 3.14, 3.18, 3.19 and 4.0 targets might need a minor refresh as well, however, it looks like everything still applies cleanly with occasional small offsets. Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org> SVN-Revision: 44876
343 lines
11 KiB
Diff
343 lines
11 KiB
Diff
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com>
|
|
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 10:55:54 -0800
|
|
Subject: [PATCH] fib_trie: Optimize fib_table_lookup to avoid wasting
|
|
time on loops/variables
|
|
|
|
This patch is meant to reduce the complexity of fib_table_lookup by reducing
|
|
the number of variables to the bare minimum while still keeping the same if
|
|
not improved functionality versus the original.
|
|
|
|
Most of this change was started off by the desire to rid the function of
|
|
chopped_off and current_prefix_length as they actually added very little to
|
|
the function since they only applied when computing the cindex. I was able
|
|
to replace them mostly with just a check for the prefix match. As long as
|
|
the prefix between the key and the node being tested was the same we know
|
|
we can search the tnode fully versus just testing cindex 0.
|
|
|
|
The second portion of the change ended up being a massive reordering.
|
|
Originally the calls to check_leaf were up near the start of the loop, and
|
|
the backtracing and descending into lower levels of tnodes was later. This
|
|
didn't make much sense as the structure of the tree means the leaves are
|
|
always the last thing to be tested. As such I reordered things so that we
|
|
instead have a loop that will delve into the tree and only exit when we
|
|
have either found a leaf or we have exhausted the tree. The advantage of
|
|
rearranging things like this is that we can fully inline check_leaf since
|
|
there is now only one reference to it in the function.
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
|
|
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
|
|
@@ -90,6 +90,9 @@ typedef unsigned int t_key;
|
|
#define IS_TNODE(n) ((n)->bits)
|
|
#define IS_LEAF(n) (!(n)->bits)
|
|
|
|
+#define get_shift(_kv) (KEYLENGTH - (_kv)->pos - (_kv)->bits)
|
|
+#define get_index(_key, _kv) (((_key) ^ (_kv)->key) >> get_shift(_kv))
|
|
+
|
|
struct tnode {
|
|
t_key key;
|
|
unsigned char bits; /* 2log(KEYLENGTH) bits needed */
|
|
@@ -1281,7 +1284,7 @@ static int check_leaf(struct fib_table *
|
|
continue;
|
|
fib_alias_accessed(fa);
|
|
err = fib_props[fa->fa_type].error;
|
|
- if (err) {
|
|
+ if (unlikely(err < 0)) {
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_FIB_TRIE_STATS
|
|
this_cpu_inc(t->stats->semantic_match_passed);
|
|
#endif
|
|
@@ -1303,7 +1306,7 @@ static int check_leaf(struct fib_table *
|
|
res->prefixlen = li->plen;
|
|
res->nh_sel = nhsel;
|
|
res->type = fa->fa_type;
|
|
- res->scope = fa->fa_info->fib_scope;
|
|
+ res->scope = fi->fib_scope;
|
|
res->fi = fi;
|
|
res->table = tb;
|
|
res->fa_head = &li->falh;
|
|
@@ -1321,23 +1324,24 @@ static int check_leaf(struct fib_table *
|
|
return 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
+static inline t_key prefix_mismatch(t_key key, struct tnode *n)
|
|
+{
|
|
+ t_key prefix = n->key;
|
|
+
|
|
+ return (key ^ prefix) & (prefix | -prefix);
|
|
+}
|
|
+
|
|
int fib_table_lookup(struct fib_table *tb, const struct flowi4 *flp,
|
|
struct fib_result *res, int fib_flags)
|
|
{
|
|
- struct trie *t = (struct trie *) tb->tb_data;
|
|
+ struct trie *t = (struct trie *)tb->tb_data;
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_FIB_TRIE_STATS
|
|
struct trie_use_stats __percpu *stats = t->stats;
|
|
#endif
|
|
- int ret;
|
|
- struct tnode *n;
|
|
- struct tnode *pn;
|
|
- unsigned int pos, bits;
|
|
- t_key key = ntohl(flp->daddr);
|
|
- unsigned int chopped_off;
|
|
- t_key cindex = 0;
|
|
- unsigned int current_prefix_length = KEYLENGTH;
|
|
- struct tnode *cn;
|
|
- t_key pref_mismatch;
|
|
+ const t_key key = ntohl(flp->daddr);
|
|
+ struct tnode *n, *pn;
|
|
+ t_key cindex;
|
|
+ int ret = 1;
|
|
|
|
rcu_read_lock();
|
|
|
|
@@ -1349,170 +1353,102 @@ int fib_table_lookup(struct fib_table *t
|
|
this_cpu_inc(stats->gets);
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
- /* Just a leaf? */
|
|
- if (IS_LEAF(n)) {
|
|
- ret = check_leaf(tb, t, n, key, flp, res, fib_flags);
|
|
- goto found;
|
|
- }
|
|
-
|
|
pn = n;
|
|
- chopped_off = 0;
|
|
-
|
|
- while (pn) {
|
|
- pos = pn->pos;
|
|
- bits = pn->bits;
|
|
+ cindex = 0;
|
|
|
|
- if (!chopped_off)
|
|
- cindex = tkey_extract_bits(mask_pfx(key, current_prefix_length),
|
|
- pos, bits);
|
|
-
|
|
- n = tnode_get_child_rcu(pn, cindex);
|
|
-
|
|
- if (n == NULL) {
|
|
-#ifdef CONFIG_IP_FIB_TRIE_STATS
|
|
- this_cpu_inc(stats->null_node_hit);
|
|
-#endif
|
|
- goto backtrace;
|
|
- }
|
|
+ /* Step 1: Travel to the longest prefix match in the trie */
|
|
+ for (;;) {
|
|
+ unsigned long index = get_index(key, n);
|
|
+
|
|
+ /* This bit of code is a bit tricky but it combines multiple
|
|
+ * checks into a single check. The prefix consists of the
|
|
+ * prefix plus zeros for the "bits" in the prefix. The index
|
|
+ * is the difference between the key and this value. From
|
|
+ * this we can actually derive several pieces of data.
|
|
+ * if !(index >> bits)
|
|
+ * we know the value is child index
|
|
+ * else
|
|
+ * we have a mismatch in skip bits and failed
|
|
+ */
|
|
+ if (index >> n->bits)
|
|
+ break;
|
|
|
|
- if (IS_LEAF(n)) {
|
|
- ret = check_leaf(tb, t, n, key, flp, res, fib_flags);
|
|
- if (ret > 0)
|
|
- goto backtrace;
|
|
+ /* we have found a leaf. Prefixes have already been compared */
|
|
+ if (IS_LEAF(n))
|
|
goto found;
|
|
- }
|
|
-
|
|
- cn = n;
|
|
|
|
- /*
|
|
- * It's a tnode, and we can do some extra checks here if we
|
|
- * like, to avoid descending into a dead-end branch.
|
|
- * This tnode is in the parent's child array at index
|
|
- * key[p_pos..p_pos+p_bits] but potentially with some bits
|
|
- * chopped off, so in reality the index may be just a
|
|
- * subprefix, padded with zero at the end.
|
|
- * We can also take a look at any skipped bits in this
|
|
- * tnode - everything up to p_pos is supposed to be ok,
|
|
- * and the non-chopped bits of the index (se previous
|
|
- * paragraph) are also guaranteed ok, but the rest is
|
|
- * considered unknown.
|
|
- *
|
|
- * The skipped bits are key[pos+bits..cn->pos].
|
|
- */
|
|
-
|
|
- /* If current_prefix_length < pos+bits, we are already doing
|
|
- * actual prefix matching, which means everything from
|
|
- * pos+(bits-chopped_off) onward must be zero along some
|
|
- * branch of this subtree - otherwise there is *no* valid
|
|
- * prefix present. Here we can only check the skipped
|
|
- * bits. Remember, since we have already indexed into the
|
|
- * parent's child array, we know that the bits we chopped of
|
|
- * *are* zero.
|
|
+ /* only record pn and cindex if we are going to be chopping
|
|
+ * bits later. Otherwise we are just wasting cycles.
|
|
*/
|
|
-
|
|
- /* NOTA BENE: Checking only skipped bits
|
|
- for the new node here */
|
|
-
|
|
- if (current_prefix_length < pos+bits) {
|
|
- if (tkey_extract_bits(cn->key, current_prefix_length,
|
|
- cn->pos - current_prefix_length)
|
|
- || !(cn->child[0]))
|
|
- goto backtrace;
|
|
+ if (index) {
|
|
+ pn = n;
|
|
+ cindex = index;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
- /*
|
|
- * If chopped_off=0, the index is fully validated and we
|
|
- * only need to look at the skipped bits for this, the new,
|
|
- * tnode. What we actually want to do is to find out if
|
|
- * these skipped bits match our key perfectly, or if we will
|
|
- * have to count on finding a matching prefix further down,
|
|
- * because if we do, we would like to have some way of
|
|
- * verifying the existence of such a prefix at this point.
|
|
- */
|
|
-
|
|
- /* The only thing we can do at this point is to verify that
|
|
- * any such matching prefix can indeed be a prefix to our
|
|
- * key, and if the bits in the node we are inspecting that
|
|
- * do not match our key are not ZERO, this cannot be true.
|
|
- * Thus, find out where there is a mismatch (before cn->pos)
|
|
- * and verify that all the mismatching bits are zero in the
|
|
- * new tnode's key.
|
|
- */
|
|
+ n = rcu_dereference(n->child[index]);
|
|
+ if (unlikely(!n))
|
|
+ goto backtrace;
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
|
- /*
|
|
- * Note: We aren't very concerned about the piece of
|
|
- * the key that precede pn->pos+pn->bits, since these
|
|
- * have already been checked. The bits after cn->pos
|
|
- * aren't checked since these are by definition
|
|
- * "unknown" at this point. Thus, what we want to see
|
|
- * is if we are about to enter the "prefix matching"
|
|
- * state, and in that case verify that the skipped
|
|
- * bits that will prevail throughout this subtree are
|
|
- * zero, as they have to be if we are to find a
|
|
- * matching prefix.
|
|
+ /* Step 2: Sort out leaves and begin backtracing for longest prefix */
|
|
+ for (;;) {
|
|
+ /* record the pointer where our next node pointer is stored */
|
|
+ struct tnode __rcu **cptr = n->child;
|
|
+
|
|
+ /* This test verifies that none of the bits that differ
|
|
+ * between the key and the prefix exist in the region of
|
|
+ * the lsb and higher in the prefix.
|
|
*/
|
|
+ if (unlikely(prefix_mismatch(key, n)))
|
|
+ goto backtrace;
|
|
|
|
- pref_mismatch = mask_pfx(cn->key ^ key, cn->pos);
|
|
+ /* exit out and process leaf */
|
|
+ if (unlikely(IS_LEAF(n)))
|
|
+ break;
|
|
|
|
- /*
|
|
- * In short: If skipped bits in this node do not match
|
|
- * the search key, enter the "prefix matching"
|
|
- * state.directly.
|
|
+ /* Don't bother recording parent info. Since we are in
|
|
+ * prefix match mode we will have to come back to wherever
|
|
+ * we started this traversal anyway
|
|
*/
|
|
- if (pref_mismatch) {
|
|
- /* fls(x) = __fls(x) + 1 */
|
|
- int mp = KEYLENGTH - __fls(pref_mismatch) - 1;
|
|
-
|
|
- if (tkey_extract_bits(cn->key, mp, cn->pos - mp) != 0)
|
|
- goto backtrace;
|
|
-
|
|
- if (current_prefix_length >= cn->pos)
|
|
- current_prefix_length = mp;
|
|
- }
|
|
-
|
|
- pn = n; /* Descend */
|
|
- chopped_off = 0;
|
|
- continue;
|
|
|
|
+ while ((n = rcu_dereference(*cptr)) == NULL) {
|
|
backtrace:
|
|
- chopped_off++;
|
|
-
|
|
- /* As zero don't change the child key (cindex) */
|
|
- while ((chopped_off <= pn->bits)
|
|
- && !(cindex & (1<<(chopped_off-1))))
|
|
- chopped_off++;
|
|
-
|
|
- /* Decrease current_... with bits chopped off */
|
|
- if (current_prefix_length > pn->pos + pn->bits - chopped_off)
|
|
- current_prefix_length = pn->pos + pn->bits
|
|
- - chopped_off;
|
|
-
|
|
- /*
|
|
- * Either we do the actual chop off according or if we have
|
|
- * chopped off all bits in this tnode walk up to our parent.
|
|
- */
|
|
-
|
|
- if (chopped_off <= pn->bits) {
|
|
- cindex &= ~(1 << (chopped_off-1));
|
|
- } else {
|
|
- struct tnode *parent = node_parent_rcu(pn);
|
|
- if (!parent)
|
|
- goto failed;
|
|
-
|
|
- /* Get Child's index */
|
|
- cindex = tkey_extract_bits(pn->key, parent->pos, parent->bits);
|
|
- pn = parent;
|
|
- chopped_off = 0;
|
|
-
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_FIB_TRIE_STATS
|
|
- this_cpu_inc(stats->backtrack);
|
|
+ if (!n)
|
|
+ this_cpu_inc(stats->null_node_hit);
|
|
#endif
|
|
- goto backtrace;
|
|
+ /* If we are at cindex 0 there are no more bits for
|
|
+ * us to strip at this level so we must ascend back
|
|
+ * up one level to see if there are any more bits to
|
|
+ * be stripped there.
|
|
+ */
|
|
+ while (!cindex) {
|
|
+ t_key pkey = pn->key;
|
|
+
|
|
+ pn = node_parent_rcu(pn);
|
|
+ if (unlikely(!pn))
|
|
+ goto failed;
|
|
+#ifdef CONFIG_IP_FIB_TRIE_STATS
|
|
+ this_cpu_inc(stats->backtrack);
|
|
+#endif
|
|
+ /* Get Child's index */
|
|
+ cindex = get_index(pkey, pn);
|
|
+ }
|
|
+
|
|
+ /* strip the least significant bit from the cindex */
|
|
+ cindex &= cindex - 1;
|
|
+
|
|
+ /* grab pointer for next child node */
|
|
+ cptr = &pn->child[cindex];
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
-failed:
|
|
- ret = 1;
|
|
+
|
|
found:
|
|
+ /* Step 3: Process the leaf, if that fails fall back to backtracing */
|
|
+ ret = check_leaf(tb, t, n, key, flp, res, fib_flags);
|
|
+ if (unlikely(ret > 0))
|
|
+ goto backtrace;
|
|
+failed:
|
|
rcu_read_unlock();
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|