openwrtv4/target/linux/generic/patches-4.9/065-v4.13-0001-mtd-handle-partitioning-on-devices-with-0-erasesize.patch
Rafał Miłecki 8c1e760ab6 kernel: backport upstream mtdpart.c cleanups
Except for renames and line changes the only conflict was in
allocate_partition in handling MTD_WRITEABLE. Hopefully it was handled
correctly.

Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
2017-06-23 11:40:05 +02:00

77 lines
3.2 KiB
Diff

From 1eeef2d7483a7e3f8d2dd2a5b9939b3b814dc549 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 15:58:31 +1200
Subject: [PATCH] mtd: handle partitioning on devices with 0 erasesize
erasesize is meaningful for flash devices but for SRAM there is no
concept of an erase block so erasesize is set to 0. When partitioning
these devices instead of ensuring partitions fall on erasesize
boundaries we ensure they fall on writesize boundaries.
Helped-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
---
drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
@@ -393,8 +393,12 @@ static struct mtd_part *allocate_partiti
const struct mtd_partition *part, int partno,
uint64_t cur_offset)
{
+ int wr_alignment = (master->flags & MTD_NO_ERASE) ? master->writesize:
+ master->erasesize;
struct mtd_part *slave;
+ u32 remainder;
char *name;
+ u64 tmp;
/* allocate the partition structure */
slave = kzalloc(sizeof(*slave), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -499,10 +503,11 @@ static struct mtd_part *allocate_partiti
if (slave->offset == MTDPART_OFS_APPEND)
slave->offset = cur_offset;
if (slave->offset == MTDPART_OFS_NXTBLK) {
+ tmp = cur_offset;
slave->offset = cur_offset;
- if (mtd_mod_by_eb(cur_offset, master) != 0) {
- /* Round up to next erasesize */
- slave->offset = (mtd_div_by_eb(cur_offset, master) + 1) * master->erasesize;
+ remainder = do_div(tmp, wr_alignment);
+ if (remainder) {
+ slave->offset += wr_alignment - remainder;
printk(KERN_NOTICE "Moving partition %d: "
"0x%012llx -> 0x%012llx\n", partno,
(unsigned long long)cur_offset, (unsigned long long)slave->offset);
@@ -567,19 +572,22 @@ static struct mtd_part *allocate_partiti
slave->mtd.erasesize = master->erasesize;
}
- if ((slave->mtd.flags & MTD_WRITEABLE) &&
- mtd_mod_by_eb(slave->offset, &slave->mtd)) {
+ tmp = slave->offset;
+ remainder = do_div(tmp, wr_alignment);
+ if ((slave->mtd.flags & MTD_WRITEABLE) && remainder) {
/* Doesn't start on a boundary of major erase size */
/* FIXME: Let it be writable if it is on a boundary of
* _minor_ erase size though */
slave->mtd.flags &= ~MTD_WRITEABLE;
- printk(KERN_WARNING"mtd: partition \"%s\" doesn't start on an erase block boundary -- force read-only\n",
+ printk(KERN_WARNING"mtd: partition \"%s\" doesn't start on an erase/write block boundary -- force read-only\n",
part->name);
}
- if ((slave->mtd.flags & MTD_WRITEABLE) &&
- mtd_mod_by_eb(slave->mtd.size, &slave->mtd)) {
+
+ tmp = slave->mtd.size;
+ remainder = do_div(tmp, wr_alignment);
+ if ((slave->mtd.flags & MTD_WRITEABLE) && remainder) {
slave->mtd.flags &= ~MTD_WRITEABLE;
- printk(KERN_WARNING"mtd: partition \"%s\" doesn't end on an erase block -- force read-only\n",
+ printk(KERN_WARNING"mtd: partition \"%s\" doesn't end on an erase/write block -- force read-only\n",
part->name);
}