1a392636a5
The upstream LED naming convention is "device:color:led-name", but it seems that many of supported boards in OpenWrt don't follow this approach.
The following patch fixes this inconsistency in dts{,i} files and updates base-files scripts for ramips target:
* fixes wrong indentation
* keeps case statements structure in same convention as in other scripts (no empty line after ";;", no indentation for case...esac body)
* fixes wrong LED names for some of boards (makes them the same as in dts{,i} files)
* combines boards with same configuration (ex. set_wifi_led "rt2800pci-phy0::radio" in 01_leds)
Signed-off-by: Piotr Dymacz <pepe2k@gmail.com>
SVN-Revision: 46664
71 lines
1.1 KiB
Text
71 lines
1.1 KiB
Text
/dts-v1/;
|
|
|
|
/include/ "rt3050.dtsi"
|
|
|
|
/ {
|
|
compatible = "BR-6425", "ralink,rt3052-soc";
|
|
model = "Edimax BR-6425";
|
|
|
|
pinctrl {
|
|
state_default: pinctrl0 {
|
|
gpio {
|
|
ralink,group = "spi", "i2c", "jtag", "rgmii", "mdio", "uartf";
|
|
ralink,function = "gpio";
|
|
};
|
|
};
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
cfi@1f000000 {
|
|
compatible = "cfi-flash";
|
|
reg = <0x1f000000 0x800000>;
|
|
bank-width = <2>;
|
|
device-width = <2>;
|
|
#address-cells = <1>;
|
|
#size-cells = <1>;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
ethernet@10100000 {
|
|
mtd-mac-address = <&factory 0x4>;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
esw@10110000 {
|
|
ralink,portmap = <0x2f>;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
wmac@10180000 {
|
|
ralink,mtd-eeprom = <&factory 0>;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
gpio-leds {
|
|
compatible = "gpio-leds";
|
|
|
|
power {
|
|
label = "br-6425:green:power";
|
|
gpios = <&gpio0 9 1>;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
wlan {
|
|
label = "br-6425:orange:wlan";
|
|
gpios = <&gpio0 14 1>;
|
|
};
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
gpio-keys-polled {
|
|
compatible = "gpio-keys-polled";
|
|
#address-cells = <1>;
|
|
#size-cells = <0>;
|
|
poll-interval = <20>;
|
|
|
|
reset_wps {
|
|
label = "reset_wps";
|
|
gpios = <&gpio0 12 1>;
|
|
linux,code = <0x198>;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
rfkill {
|
|
label = "RFKILL switch";
|
|
gpios = <&gpio0 13 1>;
|
|
linux,code = <0xf7>;
|
|
};
|
|
};
|
|
};
|