openwrtv4/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.4/0540-drm-vc4-Use-drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked.patch
Álvaro Fernández Rojas 011f2c26f1 brcm2708: update linux 4.4 patches to latest version
As usual these patches were extracted and rebased from the raspberry pi repo:
https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/tree/rpi-4.4.y

Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
2016-12-04 12:32:04 +01:00

76 lines
2.6 KiB
Diff

From 180aed47cc2cc41b8669e9e6c61f79bf1b018fed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 19:53:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] drm/vc4: Use drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked
Since my last struct_mutex crusade someone escaped!
This already has the advantage that for the common case when someone
else holds a ref the unref won't even acquire dev->struct_mutex. And
I'm working on code to allow drivers to completely opt-out of any and
all dev->struct_mutex usage, but that only works if they use the
_unlocked variants everywhere.
v2: Drop comment too.
v3: Drop the other comment too.
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1464630800-30786-15-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
(cherry picked from commit db3697295cf4da1356e3ec86761d464d6d013b48)
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_bo.c | 2 --
drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_gem.c | 11 +++--------
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_bo.c
@@ -311,8 +311,6 @@ static void vc4_bo_cache_free_old(struct
/* Called on the last userspace/kernel unreference of the BO. Returns
* it to the BO cache if possible, otherwise frees it.
- *
- * Note that this is called with the struct_mutex held.
*/
void vc4_free_object(struct drm_gem_object *gem_bo)
{
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_gem.c
@@ -67,10 +67,8 @@ vc4_free_hang_state(struct drm_device *d
{
unsigned int i;
- mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
for (i = 0; i < state->user_state.bo_count; i++)
- drm_gem_object_unreference(state->bo[i]);
- mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+ drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(state->bo[i]);
kfree(state);
}
@@ -711,11 +709,9 @@ vc4_complete_exec(struct drm_device *dev
struct vc4_dev *vc4 = to_vc4_dev(dev);
unsigned i;
- /* Need the struct lock for drm_gem_object_unreference(). */
- mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
if (exec->bo) {
for (i = 0; i < exec->bo_count; i++)
- drm_gem_object_unreference(&exec->bo[i]->base);
+ drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(&exec->bo[i]->base);
kfree(exec->bo);
}
@@ -723,9 +719,8 @@ vc4_complete_exec(struct drm_device *dev
struct vc4_bo *bo = list_first_entry(&exec->unref_list,
struct vc4_bo, unref_head);
list_del(&bo->unref_head);
- drm_gem_object_unreference(&bo->base.base);
+ drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(&bo->base.base);
}
- mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
mutex_lock(&vc4->power_lock);
if (--vc4->power_refcount == 0) {