Commit 2728512 ("e2fsprogs: List all libraries explicitly") forced the
e2fsprogs build system to link libcom_err.so in various places.
Unfortunately, the krb5 package also ships a libcom_err.so with a totally
different ABI and puts it into the global staging directory which causes
e2fsprogs to pick up this wrong library, leading to the following failure:
LD blkid
../lib/libext2fs.so: undefined reference to `_et_list'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Makefile:504: recipe for target 'blkid' failed
Change the SYSLIBS specification to explicitely link libcom_err.so.0.0
which in order to work around the problem.
In the long run, the libcom_err clash between e2fsprogs and krb5 needs to
be solved properly.
Signed-off-by: Jo-Philipp Wich <jo@mein.io>
e2fsprogs would fail linking with external toolchains which would not be able
to find several dependencies, explicit them.
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
On OS X systems, the compilation of e2fsprogs fails at subst.c due to a
missing sys/stat.h include:
subst.c:333:14: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct stat'
struct stat stbuf;
^
subst.c:333:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct stat'
struct stat stbuf;
^
subst.c:392:8: warning: implicit declaration of function 'fstat' is invalid in C99
[-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
if (fstat(fd, &stbuf) == 0) {
^
subst.c:438:12: warning: implicit declaration of function 'fchmod' is invalid in C99
[-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
(void) fchmod(ofd, 0444);
^
2 warnings and 1 error generated.
make[3]: *** [subst.o] Error 1
Declare the nescessary HAVE_SYS_STAT_H macro to include the required header in
order to avoid the undeclared stat structure.
Tested-By: David Thornley <david.thornley@touchstargroup.com>
Signed-off-by: Jo-Philipp Wich <jo@mein.io>
Note, that licensing stuff is a nightmare: many packages does not clearly
state their licenses, and often multiple source files are simply copied
together - each with different licensing information in the file headers.
I tried hard to ensure, that the license information extracted into the OpenWRT's
makefiles fit the "spirit" of the packages, e.g. such small packages which
come without a dedicated source archive "inherites" the OpenWRT's own license
in my opinion.
However, I can not garantee that I always picked the correct information
and/or did not miss license information.
Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold <mhei@heimpold.de>
SVN-Revision: 43155
