mac80211: pending brcmfmac patches cleaning channels management

They prepare brcmfmac for using wiphy_read_of_freq_limits.

Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
This commit is contained in:
Rafał Miłecki 2017-01-10 17:18:01 +01:00
parent 07df80a1a6
commit f714fe46a9
6 changed files with 257 additions and 2 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
From: =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= <rafal@milecki.pl>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 12:09:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] brcmfmac: avoid writing channel out of allocated array
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Our code was assigning number of channels to the index variable by
default. If firmware reported channel we didn't predict this would
result in using that initial index value and writing out of array. This
never happened so far (we got a complete list of supported channels) but
it means possible memory corruption so we should handle it anyway.
This patch simply detects unexpected channel and ignores it.
As we don't try to create new entry now, it's also safe to drop hw_value
and center_freq assignment. For known channels we have these set anyway.
I decided to fix this issue by assigning NULL or a target channel to the
channel variable. This was one of possible ways, I prefefred this one as
it also avoids using channel[index] over and over.
Fixes: 58de92d2f95e ("brcmfmac: use static superset of channels for wiphy bands")
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Acked-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
---
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c
@@ -5913,7 +5913,6 @@ static int brcmf_construct_chaninfo(stru
u32 i, j;
u32 total;
u32 chaninfo;
- u32 index;
pbuf = kzalloc(BRCMF_DCMD_MEDLEN, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -5961,33 +5960,36 @@ static int brcmf_construct_chaninfo(stru
ch.bw == BRCMU_CHAN_BW_80)
continue;
- channel = band->channels;
- index = band->n_channels;
+ channel = NULL;
for (j = 0; j < band->n_channels; j++) {
- if (channel[j].hw_value == ch.control_ch_num) {
- index = j;
+ if (band->channels[j].hw_value == ch.control_ch_num) {
+ channel = &band->channels[j];
break;
}
}
- channel[index].center_freq =
- ieee80211_channel_to_frequency(ch.control_ch_num,
- band->band);
- channel[index].hw_value = ch.control_ch_num;
+ if (!channel) {
+ /* It seems firmware supports some channel we never
+ * considered. Something new in IEEE standard?
+ */
+ brcmf_err("Ignoring unexpected firmware channel %d\n",
+ ch.control_ch_num);
+ continue;
+ }
/* assuming the chanspecs order is HT20,
* HT40 upper, HT40 lower, and VHT80.
*/
if (ch.bw == BRCMU_CHAN_BW_80) {
- channel[index].flags &= ~IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_80MHZ;
+ channel->flags &= ~IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_80MHZ;
} else if (ch.bw == BRCMU_CHAN_BW_40) {
- brcmf_update_bw40_channel_flag(&channel[index], &ch);
+ brcmf_update_bw40_channel_flag(channel, &ch);
} else {
/* enable the channel and disable other bandwidths
* for now as mentioned order assure they are enabled
* for subsequent chanspecs.
*/
- channel[index].flags = IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_HT40 |
- IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_80MHZ;
+ channel->flags = IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_HT40 |
+ IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_80MHZ;
ch.bw = BRCMU_CHAN_BW_20;
cfg->d11inf.encchspec(&ch);
chaninfo = ch.chspec;
@@ -5995,11 +5997,11 @@ static int brcmf_construct_chaninfo(stru
&chaninfo);
if (!err) {
if (chaninfo & WL_CHAN_RADAR)
- channel[index].flags |=
+ channel->flags |=
(IEEE80211_CHAN_RADAR |
IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR);
if (chaninfo & WL_CHAN_PASSIVE)
- channel[index].flags |=
+ channel->flags |=
IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR;
}
}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
From: =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= <rafal@milecki.pl>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 21:36:04 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] brcmfmac: don't preset all channels as disabled
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
During init we take care of regulatory stuff by disabling all
unavailable channels (see brcmf_construct_chaninfo) so this predisabling
them is not really required (and this patch won't change any behavior).
It will on the other hand allow more detailed runtime control over
channels which is the main reason for this change.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
---
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c
@@ -147,7 +147,6 @@ static struct ieee80211_rate __wl_rates[
.band = NL80211_BAND_2GHZ, \
.center_freq = (_freq), \
.hw_value = (_channel), \
- .flags = IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED, \
.max_antenna_gain = 0, \
.max_power = 30, \
}
@@ -156,7 +155,6 @@ static struct ieee80211_rate __wl_rates[
.band = NL80211_BAND_5GHZ, \
.center_freq = 5000 + (5 * (_channel)), \
.hw_value = (_channel), \
- .flags = IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED, \
.max_antenna_gain = 0, \
.max_power = 30, \
}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
From: =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= <rafal@milecki.pl>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 21:36:05 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] brcmfmac: setup wiphy bands after registering it first
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
During bands setup we disable all channels that firmware doesn't support
in the current regulatory setup. If we do this before wiphy_register
it will result in copying set flags (including IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED)
to the orig_flags which is supposed to be persistent. We don't want this
as regulatory change may result in enabling some channels. We shouldn't
mess with orig_flags then (by changing them or ignoring them) so it's
better to just take care of their proper values.
This patch cleanups code a bit (by taking orig_flags more seriously) and
allows further improvements like disabling really unavailable channels.
We will need that e.g. if some frequencies should be disabled for good
due to hardware setup (design).
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Acked-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
---
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c
@@ -6564,8 +6564,7 @@ static int brcmf_setup_wiphy(struct wiph
wiphy->bands[NL80211_BAND_5GHZ] = band;
}
}
- err = brcmf_setup_wiphybands(wiphy);
- return err;
+ return 0;
}
static s32 brcmf_config_dongle(struct brcmf_cfg80211_info *cfg)
@@ -6930,6 +6929,12 @@ struct brcmf_cfg80211_info *brcmf_cfg802
goto priv_out;
}
+ err = brcmf_setup_wiphybands(wiphy);
+ if (err) {
+ brcmf_err("Setting wiphy bands failed (%d)\n", err);
+ goto wiphy_unreg_out;
+ }
+
/* If cfg80211 didn't disable 40MHz HT CAP in wiphy_register(),
* setup 40MHz in 2GHz band and enable OBSS scanning.
*/

View file

@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
From: =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= <rafal@milecki.pl>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 23:43:45 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] brcmfmac: make brcmf_of_probe more generic
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
We may want to use Open Firmware for other devices than just SDIO ones.
In future we may want to support more Broadcom properties so there is
really no reason for such limitation.
Call brcmf_of_probe for all kind of devices & move extra conditions to
the body of that funcion.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
---
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/common.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/common.c
@@ -299,11 +299,9 @@ struct brcmf_mp_device *brcmf_get_module
}
}
}
- if ((bus_type == BRCMF_BUSTYPE_SDIO) && (!found)) {
- /* No platform data for this device. In case of SDIO try OF
- * (Open Firwmare) Device Tree.
- */
- brcmf_of_probe(dev, &settings->bus.sdio);
+ if (!found) {
+ /* No platform data for this device, try OF (Open Firwmare) */
+ brcmf_of_probe(dev, bus_type, settings);
}
return settings;
}
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/of.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/of.c
@@ -23,14 +23,17 @@
#include "common.h"
#include "of.h"
-void brcmf_of_probe(struct device *dev, struct brcmfmac_sdio_pd *sdio)
+void brcmf_of_probe(struct device *dev, enum brcmf_bus_type bus_type,
+ struct brcmf_mp_device *settings)
{
+ struct brcmfmac_sdio_pd *sdio = &settings->bus.sdio;
struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
int irq;
u32 irqf;
u32 val;
- if (!np || !of_device_is_compatible(np, "brcm,bcm4329-fmac"))
+ if (!np || bus_type != BRCMF_BUSTYPE_SDIO ||
+ !of_device_is_compatible(np, "brcm,bcm4329-fmac"))
return;
if (of_property_read_u32(np, "brcm,drive-strength", &val) == 0)
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/of.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/of.h
@@ -14,9 +14,11 @@
* CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_OF
-void brcmf_of_probe(struct device *dev, struct brcmfmac_sdio_pd *sdio);
+void brcmf_of_probe(struct device *dev, enum brcmf_bus_type bus_type,
+ struct brcmf_mp_device *settings);
#else
-static void brcmf_of_probe(struct device *dev, struct brcmfmac_sdio_pd *sdio)
+static void brcmf_of_probe(struct device *dev, enum brcmf_bus_type bus_type,
+ struct brcmf_mp_device *settings)
{
}
#endif /* CONFIG_OF */

View file

@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c
@@ -665,9 +665,37 @@ static struct wireless_dev *brcmf_cfg802
@@ -663,9 +663,37 @@ static struct wireless_dev *brcmf_cfg802
u32 *flags,
struct vif_params *params)
{

View file

@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.org>
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c
@@ -2784,6 +2784,10 @@ brcmf_cfg80211_set_power_mgmt(struct wip
@@ -2782,6 +2782,10 @@ brcmf_cfg80211_set_power_mgmt(struct wip
* preference in cfg struct to apply this to
* FW later while initializing the dongle
*/