KumiSystems/openwrtv4
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

ltq-vdsl: fix PM thread suspend and resume handling

Browse source 
This is a backport form drv_dsl_cpe_api-4.18.10 and fixes some PM
thread handling issues which lead to high system load and watchdog
trigger within 1h of uptime for boards not connected to a xdsl line.

Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller <ms@dev.tdt.de>
This commit is contained in:
Martin Schiller 2017-09-26 07:56:55 +02:00 committed by Mathias Kresin
parent a9a37526a9
commit f1ae982f8d
2 changed files with 108 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
package/kernel/lantiq/ltq-vdsl/Makefile
View file

@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ include $(INCLUDE_DIR)/kernel.mk
PKG_NAME:=ltq-vdsl-vr9 PKG_NAME:=ltq-vdsl-vr9
PKG_VERSION:=4.17.18.6 PKG_VERSION:=4.17.18.6
PKG_RELEASE:=1 PKG_RELEASE:=2
PKG_BASE_NAME:=drv_dsl_cpe_api PKG_BASE_NAME:=drv_dsl_cpe_api
PKG_SOURCE:=$(PKG_BASE_NAME)_vrx-$(PKG_VERSION).tar.gz PKG_SOURCE:=$(PKG_BASE_NAME)_vrx-$(PKG_VERSION).tar.gz

107
package/kernel/lantiq/ltq-vdsl/patches/110-semaphore-lock.patch Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
--- a/src/include/drv_dsl_cpe_pm_core.h
+++ b/src/include/drv_dsl_cpe_pm_core.h
@@ -1510,9 +1510,9 @@ typedef struct
/** Common PM module mutex*/
DSL_DRV_Mutex_t pmMutex;
/** PM module direction Near-End mutex*/
- DSL_DRV_Mutex_t pmNeMutex;
+ struct semaphore pmNeMutex;
/** PM module direction Far-End mutex*/
- DSL_DRV_Mutex_t pmFeMutex;
+ struct semaphore pmFeMutex;
/** PM module Near-End access mutex*/
DSL_DRV_Mutex_t pmNeAccessMutex;
/** PM module Far-End access mutex*/
--- a/src/pm/drv_dsl_cpe_api_pm.c
+++ b/src/pm/drv_dsl_cpe_api_pm.c
@@ -220,9 +220,9 @@ DSL_Error_t DSL_DRV_PM_Start(
/* init PM module common mutex */
DSL_DRV_MUTEX_INIT(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmMutex);
/* init PM module direction Near-End mutex */
- DSL_DRV_MUTEX_INIT(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmNeMutex);
+ sema_init(&(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmNeMutex),1);
/* init PM module direction Far-End mutex */
- DSL_DRV_MUTEX_INIT(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmFeMutex);
+ sema_init(&(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmFeMutex),1);
/* init PM module Near-End access mutex */
DSL_DRV_MUTEX_INIT(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmNeAccessMutex);
/* init PM module Far-End access mutex */
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ DSL_Error_t DSL_DRV_PM_Stop(
if( DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmThreadFe.bRun != DSL_TRUE )
{
DSL_DEBUG(DSL_DBG_WRN,
- (pContext, SYS_DBG_WRN"DSL[%02d]: PM module Near-End thread already stopped"
+ (pContext, SYS_DBG_WRN"DSL[%02d]: PM module Far-End thread already stopped"
DSL_DRV_CRLF, DSL_DEV_NUM(pContext)));
}
else
--- a/src/pm/drv_dsl_cpe_pm_core.c
+++ b/src/pm/drv_dsl_cpe_pm_core.c
@@ -1022,7 +1022,7 @@ DSL_Error_t DSL_DRV_PM_DirectionMutexCon
{
if( bLock )
{
- if( DSL_DRV_MUTEX_LOCK(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmNeMutex) )
+ if(down_interruptible(&(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmNeMutex)))
{
DSL_DEBUG( DSL_DBG_ERR,
(pContext, SYS_DBG_ERR"DSL[%02d]: ERROR - Couldn't lock PM NE mutex!"
@@ -1034,14 +1034,14 @@ DSL_Error_t DSL_DRV_PM_DirectionMutexCon
else
{
/* Unlock PM module NE Mutex*/
- DSL_DRV_MUTEX_UNLOCK(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmNeMutex);
+ up(&(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmNeMutex));
}
}
else
{
if( bLock )
{
- if( DSL_DRV_MUTEX_LOCK(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmFeMutex) )
+ if(down_interruptible(&(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmFeMutex)))
{
DSL_DEBUG( DSL_DBG_ERR,
(pContext, SYS_DBG_ERR"DSL[%02d]: ERROR - Couldn't lock PM FE mutex!"
@@ -1053,7 +1053,7 @@ DSL_Error_t DSL_DRV_PM_DirectionMutexCon
else
{
/* Unlock PM module FE Mutex*/
- DSL_DRV_MUTEX_UNLOCK(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmFeMutex);
+ up(&(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmFeMutex));
}
}
@@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@ DSL_Error_t DSL_DRV_PM_Lock(DSL_Context_
if( !(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->bPmLock) )
{
/* Lock PM module Near-End Mutex*/
- if( DSL_DRV_MUTEX_LOCK(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmNeMutex) )
+ if(down_interruptible(&(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmNeMutex)))
{
DSL_DEBUG( DSL_DBG_ERR,
(pContext, SYS_DBG_ERR"DSL[%02d]: ERROR - Couldn't lock PM NE mutex!"
@@ -1148,8 +1148,8 @@ DSL_Error_t DSL_DRV_PM_Lock(DSL_Context_
return DSL_ERR_SEMAPHORE_GET;
}
- /* Lock PM module Near-End Mutex*/
- if( DSL_DRV_MUTEX_LOCK(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmFeMutex) )
+ /* Lock PM module Far-End Mutex*/
+ if( down_interruptible(&(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmFeMutex)) )
{
DSL_DEBUG( DSL_DBG_ERR,
(pContext, SYS_DBG_ERR"DSL[%02d]: ERROR - Couldn't lock PM FE mutex!"
@@ -1193,10 +1193,10 @@ DSL_Error_t DSL_DRV_PM_UnLock(DSL_Contex
if( DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->bPmLock )
{
/* Unlock PM module NE Mutex*/
- DSL_DRV_MUTEX_UNLOCK(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmNeMutex);
+ up(&(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmNeMutex));
/* Unlock PM module FE Mutex*/
- DSL_DRV_MUTEX_UNLOCK(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmFeMutex);
+ up(&(DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->pmFeMutex));
/* Clear bPmLock flag*/
DSL_DRV_PM_CONTEXT(pContext)->bPmLock = DSL_FALSE;