kernel: fix ubifs loosing O_TMPFILE data after power cut
There was a bug in ubifs related to the O_TMPFILE. When reapplying changes after power cut data could be lost. This problem was exposed by overlayfs and the upstream commit 3a1e819b4e80 ("ovl: store file handle of lower inode on copy up"). This fixes a regression introduced when switching from 4.9 to 4.14. Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
This commit is contained in:
parent
80526d2fed
commit
c6a1bcac16
1 changed files with 89 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
|
|||
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
|
||||
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 23:04:43 +0100
|
||||
Subject: [PATCH] ubifs: Handle re-linking of inodes correctly while recovery
|
||||
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
||||
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
|
||||
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
|
||||
|
||||
UBIFS's recovery code strictly assumes that a deleted inode will never
|
||||
come back, therefore it removes all data which belongs to that inode
|
||||
as soon it faces an inode with link count 0 in the replay list.
|
||||
Before O_TMPFILE this assumption was perfectly fine. With O_TMPFILE
|
||||
it can lead to data loss upon a power-cut.
|
||||
|
||||
Consider a journal with entries like:
|
||||
0: inode X (nlink = 0) /* O_TMPFILE was created */
|
||||
1: data for inode X /* Someone writes to the temp file */
|
||||
2: inode X (nlink = 0) /* inode was changed, xattr, chmod, … */
|
||||
3: inode X (nlink = 1) /* inode was re-linked via linkat() */
|
||||
|
||||
Upon replay of entry #2 UBIFS will drop all data that belongs to inode X,
|
||||
this will lead to an empty file after mounting.
|
||||
|
||||
As solution for this problem, scan the replay list for a re-link entry
|
||||
before dropping data.
|
||||
|
||||
Fixes: 474b93704f32 ("ubifs: Implement O_TMPFILE")
|
||||
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
|
||||
Cc: Russell Senior <russell@personaltelco.net>
|
||||
Cc: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
|
||||
Reported-by: Russell Senior <russell@personaltelco.net>
|
||||
Reported-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
|
||||
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
|
||||
---
|
||||
fs/ubifs/replay.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
||||
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
|
||||
|
||||
--- a/fs/ubifs/replay.c
|
||||
+++ b/fs/ubifs/replay.c
|
||||
@@ -210,6 +210,38 @@ static int trun_remove_range(struct ubif
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
+ * inode_still_linked - check whether inode in question will be re-linked.
|
||||
+ * @c: UBIFS file-system description object
|
||||
+ * @rino: replay entry to test
|
||||
+ *
|
||||
+ * O_TMPFILE files can be re-linked, this means link count goes from 0 to 1.
|
||||
+ * This case needs special care, otherwise all references to the inode will
|
||||
+ * be removed upon the first replay entry of an inode with link count 0
|
||||
+ * is found.
|
||||
+ */
|
||||
+static bool inode_still_linked(struct ubifs_info *c, struct replay_entry *rino)
|
||||
+{
|
||||
+ struct replay_entry *r;
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ ubifs_assert(rino->deletion);
|
||||
+ ubifs_assert(key_type(c, &rino->key) == UBIFS_INO_KEY);
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ /*
|
||||
+ * Find the most recent entry for the inode behind @rino and check
|
||||
+ * whether it is a deletion.
|
||||
+ */
|
||||
+ list_for_each_entry_reverse(r, &c->replay_list, list) {
|
||||
+ ubifs_assert(r->sqnum >= rino->sqnum);
|
||||
+ if (key_inum(c, &r->key) == key_inum(c, &rino->key))
|
||||
+ return r->deletion == 0;
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ ubifs_assert(0);
|
||||
+ return false;
|
||||
+}
|
||||
+
|
||||
+/**
|
||||
* apply_replay_entry - apply a replay entry to the TNC.
|
||||
* @c: UBIFS file-system description object
|
||||
* @r: replay entry to apply
|
||||
@@ -239,6 +271,11 @@ static int apply_replay_entry(struct ubi
|
||||
{
|
||||
ino_t inum = key_inum(c, &r->key);
|
||||
|
||||
+ if (inode_still_linked(c, r)) {
|
||||
+ err = 0;
|
||||
+ break;
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
+
|
||||
err = ubifs_tnc_remove_ino(c, inum);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue