mtd: remove the warning about read-only caused by size vs. block boundary mismatch
Since the kernel/rootfs split handling was modified 2 years ago by r37283 ( https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/37283 ) and by the subsequent checkins, users have seen rather scary mtd errors in the log at every boot. The message ends "-- forcing read-only", which looks a bit error-like. That error has been mentioned in some forum threads, when users have noticed this message instead of some actual error. [ 2.940000] 0x000000070000-0x000000ff0000 : "firmware" [ 2.970000] 2 netgear-fw partitions found on MTD device firmware [ 2.970000] 0x000000070000-0x000000188440 : "kernel" [ 2.980000] mtd: partition "kernel" must either start or end on erase block boundary or be smaller than an erase block -- forcing read-only [ 2.990000] 0x000000188440-0x000000ff0000 : "rootfs" The patch removes the rather useless warning message. signed-off-by: Hannu Nyman <hannu.nyman@iki.fi> SVN-Revision: 45669
This commit is contained in:
parent
08436887fb
commit
ac0e2479dc
2 changed files with 2 additions and 8 deletions
|
@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
|
||||||
if (instr->fail_addr != MTD_FAIL_ADDR_UNKNOWN)
|
if (instr->fail_addr != MTD_FAIL_ADDR_UNKNOWN)
|
||||||
instr->fail_addr -= part->offset;
|
instr->fail_addr -= part->offset;
|
||||||
instr->addr -= part->offset;
|
instr->addr -= part->offset;
|
||||||
@@ -514,18 +582,24 @@ static struct mtd_part *allocate_partiti
|
@@ -514,18 +582,21 @@ static struct mtd_part *allocate_partiti
|
||||||
if ((slave->mtd.flags & MTD_WRITEABLE) &&
|
if ((slave->mtd.flags & MTD_WRITEABLE) &&
|
||||||
mtd_mod_by_eb(slave->offset, &slave->mtd)) {
|
mtd_mod_by_eb(slave->offset, &slave->mtd)) {
|
||||||
/* Doesn't start on a boundary of major erase size */
|
/* Doesn't start on a boundary of major erase size */
|
||||||
|
@ -125,9 +125,6 @@
|
||||||
+ else
|
+ else
|
||||||
+ slave->mtd.erasesize = slave->mtd.size;
|
+ slave->mtd.erasesize = slave->mtd.size;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
+ if ((slave->mtd.flags & (MTD_ERASE_PARTIAL|MTD_WRITEABLE)) == MTD_ERASE_PARTIAL)
|
|
||||||
+ printk(KERN_WARNING"mtd: partition \"%s\" must either start or end on erase block boundary or be smaller than an erase block -- forcing read-only\n",
|
|
||||||
+ part->name);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
slave->mtd.ecclayout = master->ecclayout;
|
slave->mtd.ecclayout = master->ecclayout;
|
||||||
slave->mtd.ecc_step_size = master->ecc_step_size;
|
slave->mtd.ecc_step_size = master->ecc_step_size;
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
|
||||||
if (instr->fail_addr != MTD_FAIL_ADDR_UNKNOWN)
|
if (instr->fail_addr != MTD_FAIL_ADDR_UNKNOWN)
|
||||||
instr->fail_addr -= part->offset;
|
instr->fail_addr -= part->offset;
|
||||||
instr->addr -= part->offset;
|
instr->addr -= part->offset;
|
||||||
@@ -513,18 +581,24 @@ static struct mtd_part *allocate_partiti
|
@@ -513,18 +581,21 @@ static struct mtd_part *allocate_partiti
|
||||||
if ((slave->mtd.flags & MTD_WRITEABLE) &&
|
if ((slave->mtd.flags & MTD_WRITEABLE) &&
|
||||||
mtd_mod_by_eb(slave->offset, &slave->mtd)) {
|
mtd_mod_by_eb(slave->offset, &slave->mtd)) {
|
||||||
/* Doesn't start on a boundary of major erase size */
|
/* Doesn't start on a boundary of major erase size */
|
||||||
|
@ -125,9 +125,6 @@
|
||||||
+ else
|
+ else
|
||||||
+ slave->mtd.erasesize = slave->mtd.size;
|
+ slave->mtd.erasesize = slave->mtd.size;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
+ if ((slave->mtd.flags & (MTD_ERASE_PARTIAL|MTD_WRITEABLE)) == MTD_ERASE_PARTIAL)
|
|
||||||
+ printk(KERN_WARNING"mtd: partition \"%s\" must either start or end on erase block boundary or be smaller than an erase block -- forcing read-only\n",
|
|
||||||
+ part->name);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
slave->mtd.ecclayout = master->ecclayout;
|
slave->mtd.ecclayout = master->ecclayout;
|
||||||
slave->mtd.ecc_step_size = master->ecc_step_size;
|
slave->mtd.ecc_step_size = master->ecc_step_size;
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue