1a392636a5
The upstream LED naming convention is "device:color:led-name", but it seems that many of supported boards in OpenWrt don't follow this approach.
The following patch fixes this inconsistency in dts{,i} files and updates base-files scripts for ramips target:
* fixes wrong indentation
* keeps case statements structure in same convention as in other scripts (no empty line after ";;", no indentation for case...esac body)
* fixes wrong LED names for some of boards (makes them the same as in dts{,i} files)
* combines boards with same configuration (ex. set_wifi_led "rt2800pci-phy0::radio" in 01_leds)
Signed-off-by: Piotr Dymacz <pepe2k@gmail.com>
SVN-Revision: 46664
77 lines
1.1 KiB
Text
77 lines
1.1 KiB
Text
/include/ "rt5350.dtsi"
|
|
|
|
/ {
|
|
compatible = "AWM002", "ralink,rt5350-soc";
|
|
model = "AsiaRF AWM002";
|
|
|
|
palmbus@10000000 {
|
|
spi@b00 {
|
|
status = "okay";
|
|
|
|
m25p80@0 {
|
|
#address-cells = <1>;
|
|
#size-cells = <1>;
|
|
reg = <0 0>;
|
|
spi-max-frequency = <10000000>;
|
|
|
|
partition@0 {
|
|
label = "u-boot";
|
|
reg = <0x0 0x30000>;
|
|
read-only;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
partition@30000 {
|
|
label = "u-boot-env";
|
|
reg = <0x30000 0x10000>;
|
|
read-only;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
factory: partition@40000 {
|
|
label = "factory";
|
|
reg = <0x40000 0x10000>;
|
|
read-only;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
partition@50000 {
|
|
label = "firmware";
|
|
reg = <0x50000 0x1fb0000>;
|
|
};
|
|
};
|
|
};
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
pinctrl {
|
|
state_default: pinctrl0 {
|
|
gpio {
|
|
ralink,group = "i2c", "jtag";
|
|
ralink,function = "gpio";
|
|
};
|
|
};
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
esw@10110000 {
|
|
ralink,portmap = <0x3f>;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
ehci@101c0000 {
|
|
status = "okay";
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
ohci@101c1000 {
|
|
status = "okay";
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
gpio-leds {
|
|
compatible = "gpio-leds";
|
|
|
|
ld1 {
|
|
label = "awm002:green:ld1";
|
|
gpios = <&gpio0 0 1>;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
ld2 {
|
|
label = "awm002:green:ld2";
|
|
gpios = <&gpio0 1 1>;
|
|
};
|
|
};
|
|
};
|