openwrtv3/target/linux/generic/pending-3.18/080-17-fib_trie-Remove-checks-for-index-tnode_child_length-.patch
John Crispin 74d00a8c38 kernel: split patches folder up into backport, pending and hack folders
* properly format/comment all patches
* merge debloat patches
* merge Kconfig patches
* merge swconfig patches
* merge hotplug patches
* drop 200-fix_localversion.patch - upstream
* drop 222-arm_zimage_none.patch - unused
* drop 252-mv_cesa_depends.patch - no longer required
* drop 410-mtd-move-forward-declaration-of-struct-mtd_info.patch - unused
* drop 661-fq_codel_keep_dropped_stats.patch - outdated
* drop 702-phy_add_aneg_done_function.patch - upstream
* drop 840-rtc7301.patch - unused
* drop 841-rtc_pt7c4338.patch - upstream
* drop 921-use_preinit_as_init.patch - unused
* drop spio-gpio-old and gpio-mmc - unused

Signed-off-by: John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>
2017-08-05 08:46:36 +02:00

95 lines
2.9 KiB
Diff

From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 10:57:02 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] fib_trie: Remove checks for index >= tnode_child_length
from tnode_get_child
For some reason the compiler doesn't seem to understand that when we are in
a loop that runs from tnode_child_length - 1 to 0 we don't expect the value
of tn->bits to change. As such every call to tnode_get_child was rerunning
tnode_chile_length which ended up consuming quite a bit of space in the
resultant assembly code.
I have gone though and verified that in all cases where tnode_get_child
is used we are either winding though a fixed loop from tnode_child_length -
1 to 0, or are in a fastpath case where we are verifying the value by
either checking for any remaining bits after shifting index by bits and
testing for leaf, or by using tnode_child_length.
size net/ipv4/fib_trie.o
Before:
text data bss dec hex filename
15506 376 8 15890 3e12 net/ipv4/fib_trie.o
After:
text data bss dec hex filename
14827 376 8 15211 3b6b net/ipv4/fib_trie.o
Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
@@ -186,8 +186,6 @@ static inline unsigned long tnode_child_
static inline struct tnode *tnode_get_child(const struct tnode *tn,
unsigned long i)
{
- BUG_ON(i >= tnode_child_length(tn));
-
return rtnl_dereference(tn->child[i]);
}
@@ -195,8 +193,6 @@ static inline struct tnode *tnode_get_ch
static inline struct tnode *tnode_get_child_rcu(const struct tnode *tn,
unsigned long i)
{
- BUG_ON(i >= tnode_child_length(tn));
-
return rcu_dereference_rtnl(tn->child[i]);
}
@@ -371,7 +367,7 @@ static inline int tnode_full(const struc
*/
static void put_child(struct tnode *tn, unsigned long i, struct tnode *n)
{
- struct tnode *chi = rtnl_dereference(tn->child[i]);
+ struct tnode *chi = tnode_get_child(tn, i);
int isfull, wasfull;
BUG_ON(i >= tnode_child_length(tn));
@@ -867,7 +863,7 @@ static struct tnode *fib_find_node(struc
if (IS_LEAF(n))
break;
- n = rcu_dereference_rtnl(n->child[index]);
+ n = tnode_get_child_rcu(n, index);
}
return n;
@@ -934,7 +930,7 @@ static struct list_head *fib_insert_node
}
tp = n;
- n = rcu_dereference_rtnl(n->child[index]);
+ n = tnode_get_child_rcu(n, index);
}
l = leaf_new(key);
@@ -1215,7 +1211,7 @@ int fib_table_lookup(struct fib_table *t
cindex = index;
}
- n = rcu_dereference(n->child[index]);
+ n = tnode_get_child_rcu(n, index);
if (unlikely(!n))
goto backtrace;
}
@@ -1835,7 +1831,7 @@ static void trie_collect_stats(struct tr
if (n->bits < MAX_STAT_DEPTH)
s->nodesizes[n->bits]++;
- for (i = 0; i < tnode_child_length(n); i++) {
+ for (i = tnode_child_length(n); i--;) {
if (!rcu_access_pointer(n->child[i]))
s->nullpointers++;
}