Commit graph

6 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
John Crispin
1cfe6b6847 fuse: fix build on arm64
error:
../include/fuse_kernel.h:93:15: error: conflicting types for 'int64_t'
../include/fuse_kernel.h:92:15: error: conflicting types for 'uint64_t'

reported by buildbot

fix by adopting upstream patch:
http://git.baserock.org/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/delta/fuse.git/commit/include/fuse_kernel.h?id=914871b20a901e3e1e981c92bc42b1c93b7ab81b

Signed-off-by: Dirk Neukirchen <dirkneukirchen@web.de>

SVN-Revision: 45740
2015-05-23 15:29:31 +00:00
Felix Fietkau
5441f56685 fuse: add missing include lines, fixes musl build
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>

SVN-Revision: 45076
2015-03-28 10:19:18 +00:00
Nicolas Thill
a46965888a fuse: update to 2.9.3
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Thill <nico@openwrt.org>

SVN-Revision: 43941
2015-01-11 22:15:03 +00:00
John Crispin
74a3a77bcd license info - revert r43155
turns out that r43155 adds duplicate info.

Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>

SVN-Revision: 43167
2014-11-03 09:56:44 +00:00
John Crispin
c10d97484a Add more license tags with SPDX identifiers
Note, that licensing stuff is a nightmare: many packages does not clearly
state their licenses, and often multiple source files are simply copied
together - each with different licensing information in the file headers.

I tried hard to ensure, that the license information extracted into the OpenWRT's
makefiles fit the "spirit" of the packages, e.g. such small packages which
come without a dedicated source archive "inherites" the OpenWRT's own license
in my opinion.

However, I can not garantee that I always picked the correct information
and/or did not miss license information.

Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold <mhei@heimpold.de>

SVN-Revision: 43155
2014-11-03 08:01:08 +00:00
John Crispin
4ebf19b48f packages: clean up the package folder
Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>

SVN-Revision: 37007
2013-06-21 16:54:37 +00:00