kernel: add accidentally left out fib trie backport patch
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org> SVN-Revision: 45650
This commit is contained in:
parent
3f4011ad36
commit
dbb99e937a
1 changed files with 52 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
|
|||
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com>
|
||||
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:51:08 -0800
|
||||
Subject: [PATCH] fib_trie: Use index & (~0ul << n->bits) instead of index >>
|
||||
n->bits
|
||||
|
||||
In doing performance testing and analysis of the changes I recently found
|
||||
that by shifting the index I had created an unnecessary dependency.
|
||||
|
||||
I have updated the code so that we instead shift a mask by bits and then
|
||||
just test against that as that should save us about 2 CPU cycles since we
|
||||
can generate the mask while the key and pos are being processed.
|
||||
|
||||
Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com>
|
||||
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
|
||||
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
|
||||
@@ -961,12 +961,12 @@ static struct tnode *fib_find_node(struc
|
||||
* prefix plus zeros for the bits in the cindex. The index
|
||||
* is the difference between the key and this value. From
|
||||
* this we can actually derive several pieces of data.
|
||||
- * if !(index >> bits)
|
||||
- * we know the value is cindex
|
||||
- * else
|
||||
+ * if (index & (~0ul << bits))
|
||||
* we have a mismatch in skip bits and failed
|
||||
+ * else
|
||||
+ * we know the value is cindex
|
||||
*/
|
||||
- if (index >> n->bits)
|
||||
+ if (index & (~0ul << n->bits))
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
/* we have found a leaf. Prefixes have already been compared */
|
||||
@@ -1301,12 +1301,12 @@ int fib_table_lookup(struct fib_table *t
|
||||
* prefix plus zeros for the "bits" in the prefix. The index
|
||||
* is the difference between the key and this value. From
|
||||
* this we can actually derive several pieces of data.
|
||||
- * if !(index >> bits)
|
||||
- * we know the value is child index
|
||||
- * else
|
||||
+ * if (index & (~0ul << bits))
|
||||
* we have a mismatch in skip bits and failed
|
||||
+ * else
|
||||
+ * we know the value is cindex
|
||||
*/
|
||||
- if (index >> n->bits)
|
||||
+ if (index & (~0ul << n->bits))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
/* we have found a leaf. Prefixes have already been compared */
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue