kernel: add missing checks in the netfilter optimization patch which broke some rules containing only source/destination address checks
SVN-Revision: 27923
This commit is contained in:
parent
a1d5ad7655
commit
ac96ae6731
4 changed files with 25 additions and 19 deletions
|
@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
|
|||
if (FWINV((ip->saddr&ipinfo->smsk.s_addr) != ipinfo->src.s_addr,
|
||||
IPT_INV_SRCIP) ||
|
||||
FWINV((ip->daddr&ipinfo->dmsk.s_addr) != ipinfo->dst.s_addr,
|
||||
@@ -143,6 +146,26 @@ ip_packet_match(const struct iphdr *ip,
|
||||
@@ -143,6 +146,29 @@ ip_packet_match(const struct iphdr *ip,
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -38,6 +38,9 @@
|
|||
+ if (memcmp(ip->outiface_mask, iface_mask, IFNAMSIZ) != 0)
|
||||
+ return;
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ if (ip->smsk.s_addr || ip->dmsk.s_addr)
|
||||
+ return;
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ if (ip->proto)
|
||||
+ return;
|
||||
+
|
||||
|
@ -47,7 +50,7 @@
|
|||
static bool
|
||||
ip_checkentry(const struct ipt_ip *ip)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -566,7 +589,7 @@ static void cleanup_match(struct xt_entr
|
||||
@@ -566,7 +592,7 @@ static void cleanup_match(struct xt_entr
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int
|
||||
|
@ -56,7 +59,7 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
const struct xt_entry_target *t;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -575,6 +598,8 @@ check_entry(const struct ipt_entry *e, c
|
||||
@@ -575,6 +601,8 @@ check_entry(const struct ipt_entry *e, c
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -65,7 +68,7 @@
|
|||
if (e->target_offset + sizeof(struct xt_entry_target) >
|
||||
e->next_offset)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
@@ -936,6 +961,7 @@ copy_entries_to_user(unsigned int total_
|
||||
@@ -936,6 +964,7 @@ copy_entries_to_user(unsigned int total_
|
||||
const struct xt_table_info *private = table->private;
|
||||
int ret = 0;
|
||||
const void *loc_cpu_entry;
|
||||
|
@ -73,7 +76,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
counters = alloc_counters(table);
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(counters))
|
||||
@@ -967,6 +993,14 @@ copy_entries_to_user(unsigned int total_
|
||||
@@ -967,6 +996,14 @@ copy_entries_to_user(unsigned int total_
|
||||
goto free_counters;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|||
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
|
||||
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
|
||||
@@ -316,6 +316,33 @@ struct ipt_entry *ipt_next_entry(const s
|
||||
@@ -319,6 +319,33 @@ struct ipt_entry *ipt_next_entry(const s
|
||||
return (void *)entry + entry->next_offset;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
|
|||
/* Returns one of the generic firewall policies, like NF_ACCEPT. */
|
||||
unsigned int
|
||||
ipt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
@@ -339,6 +366,23 @@ ipt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
@@ -342,6 +369,23 @@ ipt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
ip = ip_hdr(skb);
|
||||
indev = in ? in->name : nulldevname;
|
||||
outdev = out ? out->name : nulldevname;
|
||||
|
@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
|
|||
/* We handle fragments by dealing with the first fragment as
|
||||
* if it was a normal packet. All other fragments are treated
|
||||
* normally, except that they will NEVER match rules that ask
|
||||
@@ -353,17 +397,6 @@ ipt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
@@ -356,17 +400,6 @@ ipt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
acpar.family = NFPROTO_IPV4;
|
||||
acpar.hooknum = hook;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
|
|||
if (FWINV((ip->saddr&ipinfo->smsk.s_addr) != ipinfo->src.s_addr,
|
||||
IPT_INV_SRCIP) ||
|
||||
FWINV((ip->daddr&ipinfo->dmsk.s_addr) != ipinfo->dst.s_addr,
|
||||
@@ -134,6 +137,26 @@ ip_packet_match(const struct iphdr *ip,
|
||||
@@ -134,6 +137,29 @@ ip_packet_match(const struct iphdr *ip,
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -38,6 +38,9 @@
|
|||
+ if (memcmp(ip->outiface_mask, iface_mask, IFNAMSIZ) != 0)
|
||||
+ return;
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ if (ip->smsk.s_addr || ip->dmsk.s_addr)
|
||||
+ return;
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ if (ip->proto)
|
||||
+ return;
|
||||
+
|
||||
|
@ -47,7 +50,7 @@
|
|||
static bool
|
||||
ip_checkentry(const struct ipt_ip *ip)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -561,7 +584,7 @@ static void cleanup_match(struct xt_entr
|
||||
@@ -561,7 +587,7 @@ static void cleanup_match(struct xt_entr
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int
|
||||
|
@ -56,7 +59,7 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
const struct xt_entry_target *t;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -570,6 +593,8 @@ check_entry(const struct ipt_entry *e, c
|
||||
@@ -570,6 +596,8 @@ check_entry(const struct ipt_entry *e, c
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -65,7 +68,7 @@
|
|||
if (e->target_offset + sizeof(struct xt_entry_target) >
|
||||
e->next_offset)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
@@ -931,6 +956,7 @@ copy_entries_to_user(unsigned int total_
|
||||
@@ -931,6 +959,7 @@ copy_entries_to_user(unsigned int total_
|
||||
const struct xt_table_info *private = table->private;
|
||||
int ret = 0;
|
||||
const void *loc_cpu_entry;
|
||||
|
@ -73,11 +76,10 @@
|
|||
|
||||
counters = alloc_counters(table);
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(counters))
|
||||
@@ -961,6 +987,14 @@ copy_entries_to_user(unsigned int total_
|
||||
ret = -EFAULT;
|
||||
@@ -962,6 +991,14 @@ copy_entries_to_user(unsigned int total_
|
||||
goto free_counters;
|
||||
}
|
||||
+
|
||||
|
||||
+ flags = e->ip.flags & IPT_F_MASK;
|
||||
+ if (copy_to_user(userptr + off
|
||||
+ + offsetof(struct ipt_entry, ip.flags),
|
||||
|
@ -85,6 +87,7 @@
|
|||
+ ret = -EFAULT;
|
||||
+ goto free_counters;
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
|
||||
+
|
||||
for (i = sizeof(struct ipt_entry);
|
||||
i < e->target_offset;
|
||||
i += m->u.match_size) {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|||
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
|
||||
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
|
||||
@@ -307,6 +307,33 @@ struct ipt_entry *ipt_next_entry(const s
|
||||
@@ -310,6 +310,33 @@ struct ipt_entry *ipt_next_entry(const s
|
||||
return (void *)entry + entry->next_offset;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
|
|||
/* Returns one of the generic firewall policies, like NF_ACCEPT. */
|
||||
unsigned int
|
||||
ipt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
@@ -331,6 +358,25 @@ ipt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
@@ -334,6 +361,25 @@ ipt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
ip = ip_hdr(skb);
|
||||
indev = in ? in->name : nulldevname;
|
||||
outdev = out ? out->name : nulldevname;
|
||||
|
@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
|
|||
/* We handle fragments by dealing with the first fragment as
|
||||
* if it was a normal packet. All other fragments are treated
|
||||
* normally, except that they will NEVER match rules that ask
|
||||
@@ -345,18 +391,6 @@ ipt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
@@ -348,18 +394,6 @@ ipt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
acpar.family = NFPROTO_IPV4;
|
||||
acpar.hooknum = hook;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue