diff --git a/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-4.1/400-mtd-bcm47xxpart-get-nvram.patch b/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-4.1/400-mtd-bcm47xxpart-get-nvram.patch
index df51191ad8..de109e35f4 100644
--- a/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-4.1/400-mtd-bcm47xxpart-get-nvram.patch
+++ b/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-4.1/400-mtd-bcm47xxpart-get-nvram.patch
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
 --- a/drivers/mtd/bcm47xxpart.c
 +++ b/drivers/mtd/bcm47xxpart.c
-@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ static int bcm47xxpart_parse(struct mtd_
- 	int trx_part = -1;
+@@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ static int bcm47xxpart_parse(struct mtd_
  	int last_trx_part = -1;
  	int possible_nvram_sizes[] = { 0x8000, 0xF000, 0x10000, };
+ 	int err;
 +	bool found_nvram = false;
  
  	/*
  	 * Some really old flashes (like AT45DB*) had smaller erasesize-s, but
-@@ -300,12 +301,23 @@ static int bcm47xxpart_parse(struct mtd_
+@@ -306,12 +307,23 @@ static int bcm47xxpart_parse(struct mtd_
  		if (buf[0] == NVRAM_HEADER) {
  			bcm47xxpart_add_part(&parts[curr_part++], "nvram",
  					     master->size - blocksize, 0);