KumiSystems/openwrtv3
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

kernel: backport an upstream PPPoE shutdown fix

Browse source 
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>

SVN-Revision: 45548
This commit is contained in:
Felix Fietkau 2015-04-21 11:24:46 +00:00
parent 866fe3895d
commit 23f9c83594
1 changed files with 89 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

89
target/linux/generic/patches-3.18/081-pppoe-Use-workqueue-to-die-properly-when-a-PADT-is-r.patch Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
From: Simon Farnsworth <simon@farnz.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2015 10:54:39 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] pppoe: Use workqueue to die properly when a PADT is received
When a PADT frame is received, the socket may not be in a good state to
close down the PPP interface. The current implementation handles this by
simply blocking all further PPP traffic, and hoping that the lack of traffic
will trigger the user to investigate.
Use schedule_work to get to a process context from which we clear down the
PPP interface, in a fashion analogous to hangup on a TTY-based PPP
interface. This causes pppd to disconnect immediately, and allows tools to
take immediate corrective action.
Note that pppd's rp_pppoe.so plugin has code in it to disable the session
when it disconnects; however, as a consequence of this patch, the session is
already disabled before rp_pppoe.so is asked to disable the session. The
result is a harmless error message:
Failed to disconnect PPPoE socket: 114 Operation already in progress
This message is safe to ignore, as long as the error is 114 Operation
already in progress; in that specific case, it means that the PPPoE session
has already been disabled before pppd tried to disable it.
Signed-off-by: Simon Farnsworth <simon@farnz.org.uk>
Tested-by: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Christoph Schulz <develop@kristov.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
--- a/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c
@@ -455,6 +455,18 @@ out:
return NET_RX_DROP;
}
+static void pppoe_unbind_sock_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct pppox_sock *po = container_of(work, struct pppox_sock,
+ proto.pppoe.padt_work);
+ struct sock *sk = sk_pppox(po);
+
+ lock_sock(sk);
+ pppox_unbind_sock(sk);
+ release_sock(sk);
+ sock_put(sk);
+}
+
/************************************************************************
*
* Receive a PPPoE Discovery frame.
@@ -500,7 +512,8 @@ static int pppoe_disc_rcv(struct sk_buff
}
bh_unlock_sock(sk);
- sock_put(sk);
+ if (!schedule_work(&po->proto.pppoe.padt_work))
+ sock_put(sk);
}
abort:
@@ -613,6 +626,8 @@ static int pppoe_connect(struct socket *
lock_sock(sk);
+ INIT_WORK(&po->proto.pppoe.padt_work, pppoe_unbind_sock_work);
+
error = -EINVAL;
if (sp->sa_protocol != PX_PROTO_OE)
goto end;
--- a/include/linux/if_pppox.h
+++ b/include/linux/if_pppox.h
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
#include <linux/ppp_channel.h>
#include <linux/skbuff.h>
+#include <linux/workqueue.h>
#include <uapi/linux/if_pppox.h>
static inline struct pppoe_hdr *pppoe_hdr(const struct sk_buff *skb)
@@ -32,6 +33,7 @@ struct pppoe_opt {
struct pppoe_addr pa; /* what this socket is bound to*/
struct sockaddr_pppox relay; /* what socket data will be
relayed to (PPPoE relaying) */
+ struct work_struct padt_work;/* Work item for handling PADT */
};
struct pptp_opt {