ramips: use consistent naming scheme for LEDs
The upstream LED naming convention is "device:color:led-name", but it seems that many of supported boards in OpenWrt don't follow this approach. The following patch fixes this inconsistency in dts{,i} files and updates base-files scripts for ramips target: * fixes wrong indentation * keeps case statements structure in same convention as in other scripts (no empty line after ";;", no indentation for case...esac body) * fixes wrong LED names for some of boards (makes them the same as in dts{,i} files) * combines boards with same configuration (ex. set_wifi_led "rt2800pci-phy0::radio" in 01_leds) Signed-off-by: Piotr Dymacz <pepe2k@gmail.com> SVN-Revision: 46664
This commit is contained in:
parent
af60c367b7
commit
1a392636a5
80 changed files with 695 additions and 613 deletions
|
@ -84,12 +84,12 @@
|
|||
compatible = "gpio-leds";
|
||||
|
||||
powerled {
|
||||
label = "oy:green:power";
|
||||
label = "oy-0001:green:power";
|
||||
gpios = <&gpio0 9 1>;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
wifiled {
|
||||
label = "oy:green:wifi";
|
||||
label = "oy-0001:green:wifi";
|
||||
gpios = <&gpio3 0 1>;
|
||||
};
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue