add binutils 2.22

SVN-Revision: 30375

toolchain/binutils/Config.in

@@ -24,6 +24,11 @@ choice
 		depends !avr32 || (avr32 && BROKEN)
 		bool "binutils 2.21.1"
 
+	config BINUTILS_VERSION_2_22
+		depends !ubicom32
+		depends !avr32
+		bool "binutils 2.22"
+
 endchoice
 
 config EXTRA_BINUTILS_CONFIG_OPTIONS
@@ -40,5 +45,6 @@ config BINUTILS_VERSION
 	default "2.20.1"          if BINUTILS_VERSION_2_20_1
 	default "2.21"            if BINUTILS_VERSION_2_21
 	default "2.21.1"          if BINUTILS_VERSION_2_21_1
+	default "2.22"            if BINUTILS_VERSION_2_22
 	default "2.19.1"          if ubicom32
 	default "2.20.1"

toolchain/binutils/Makefile

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 #
-# Copyright (C) 2006-2011 OpenWrt.org
+# Copyright (C) 2006-2012 OpenWrt.org
 #
 # This is free software, licensed under the GNU General Public License v2.
 # See /LICENSE for more information.
@@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ endif
 ifeq ($(PKG_VERSION),2.21.1)
   PKG_MD5SUM:=bde820eac53fa3a8d8696667418557ad
 endif
+ifeq ($(PKG_VERSION),2.22)
+  PKG_MD5SUM:=ee0f10756c84979622b992a4a61ea3f5
+endif
 
 PATCH_DIR:=./patches/$(PKG_VERSION)
 

toolchain/binutils/patches/2.22/112-arm-uclibc-gas-needs-libm.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+Source: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
+Disposition: submit upstream.
+
+Description:
+
+We do not need to have the libtool patch anymore for binutils after
+libtool has been updated upstream it include support for it. However
+for building gas natively on uclibc systems we have to link it with
+-lm so that it picks up missing symbols.
+
+/local/build_area/BUILD/arm_v5t_le_uclibc/binutils-2.17.50/objdir/libiberty/pic/libiberty.a(floatformat.o): In function `floatformat_from_double':
+floatformat.c:(.text+0x1ec): undefined reference to `frexp'
+floatformat.c:(.text+0x2f8): undefined reference to `ldexp'
+/local/build_area/BUILD/arm_v5t_le_uclibc/binutils-2.17.50/objdir/libiberty/pic/libiberty.a(floatformat.o): In function `floatformat_to_double':
+floatformat.c:(.text+0x38a): undefined reference to `ldexp'
+floatformat.c:(.text+0x3d2): undefined reference to `ldexp'
+floatformat.c:(.text+0x43e): undefined reference to `ldexp'                     floatformat.c:(.text+0x4e2): undefined reference to `ldexp'
+collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
+make[4]: *** [as-new] Error 1
+
+--- a/gas/configure.tgt
++++ b/gas/configure.tgt
+@@ -428,6 +428,12 @@ case ${generic_target} in
+   *-*-netware)				fmt=elf em=netware ;;
+ esac
+ 
++case ${generic_target} in
++  arm-*-*uclibc*)
++    need_libm=yes
++    ;;
++esac
++
+ case ${cpu_type} in
+   alpha | arm | i386 | ia64 | microblaze | mips | ns32k | pdp11 | ppc | sparc | z80 | z8k)
+     bfd_gas=yes

toolchain/binutils/patches/2.22/120-sh-conf.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+--- a/configure
++++ b/configure
+@@ -3570,7 +3570,7 @@ case "${target}" in
+   mips*-*-*)
+     noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs gprof"
+     ;;
+-  sh-*-* | sh64-*-*)
++  sh*-*-* | sh64-*-*)
+     case "${target}" in
+       sh*-*-elf)
+          ;;
+--- a/configure.ac
++++ b/configure.ac
+@@ -1006,7 +1006,7 @@ case "${target}" in
+   mips*-*-*)
+     noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs gprof"
+     ;;
+-  sh-*-* | sh64-*-*)
++  sh*-*-* | sh64-*-*)
+     case "${target}" in
+       sh*-*-elf)
+          ;;

toolchain/binutils/patches/2.22/300-001_ld_makefile_patch.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+--- a/ld/Makefile.am
++++ b/ld/Makefile.am
+@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ endif
+ # We put the scripts in the directory $(scriptdir)/ldscripts.
+ # We can't put the scripts in $(datadir) because the SEARCH_DIR
+ # directives need to be different for native and cross linkers.
+-scriptdir = $(tooldir)/lib
++scriptdir = $(libdir)
+ 
+ EMUL = @EMUL@
+ EMULATION_OFILES = @EMULATION_OFILES@
+--- a/ld/Makefile.in
++++ b/ld/Makefile.in
+@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ AM_CFLAGS = $(WARN_CFLAGS)
+ # We put the scripts in the directory $(scriptdir)/ldscripts.
+ # We can't put the scripts in $(datadir) because the SEARCH_DIR
+ # directives need to be different for native and cross linkers.
+-scriptdir = $(tooldir)/lib
++scriptdir = $(libdir)
+ BASEDIR = $(srcdir)/..
+ BFDDIR = $(BASEDIR)/bfd
+ INCDIR = $(BASEDIR)/include

toolchain/binutils/patches/2.22/300-012_check_ldrunpath_length.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+--- a/ld/emultempl/elf32.em
++++ b/ld/emultempl/elf32.em
+@@ -1273,6 +1273,8 @@ fragment <<EOF
+ 	      && command_line.rpath == NULL)
+ 	    {
+ 	      lib_path = (const char *) getenv ("LD_RUN_PATH");
++	      if ((lib_path) && (strlen (lib_path) == 0))
++	      	lib_path = NULL;
+ 	      if (gld${EMULATION_NAME}_search_needed (lib_path, &n,
+ 						      force))
+ 		break;
+@@ -1500,6 +1502,8 @@ gld${EMULATION_NAME}_before_allocation (
+   rpath = command_line.rpath;
+   if (rpath == NULL)
+     rpath = (const char *) getenv ("LD_RUN_PATH");
++  if ((rpath) && (strlen (rpath) == 0))
++  	rpath = NULL;
+ 
+   for (abfd = link_info.input_bfds; abfd; abfd = abfd->link_next)
+     if (bfd_get_flavour (abfd) == bfd_target_elf_flavour)

toolchain/binutils/patches/2.22/999-ppc-textrels.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+http://bugs.gentoo.org/392645
+http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13470
+
+2011-12-03  Alan Modra  <amodra@gmail.com>
+
+	PR ld/13470
+	* elf32-ppc.c (ppc_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Revert substantive
+	change in 2011-07-01 commit.  Comment.
+	* elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Likewise.
+
+===================================================================
+RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/elf32-ppc.c,v
+retrieving revision 1.302.2.1
+retrieving revision 1.302.2.2
+--- a/bfd/elf32-ppc.c
++++ b/bfd/elf32-ppc.c
+@@ -2987,10 +2987,6 @@ ppc_elf_copy_indirect_symbol (struct bfd
+   edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt;
+   edir->elf.pointer_equality_needed |= eind->elf.pointer_equality_needed;
+ 
+-  /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.  */
+-  if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
+-    return;
+-
+   if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL)
+     {
+       if (edir->dyn_relocs != NULL)
+@@ -3022,6 +3018,16 @@ ppc_elf_copy_indirect_symbol (struct bfd
+       eind->dyn_relocs = NULL;
+     }
+ 
++  /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.
++     You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over;  After all,
++     both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just
++     moving reloc accounting around.  However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS 
++     code in ppc_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for
++     dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the
++     DIR sym here.  */
++  if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
++    return;
++
+   /* Copy over the GOT refcount entries that we may have already seen to
+      the symbol which just became indirect.  */
+   edir->elf.got.refcount += eind->elf.got.refcount;
+--- a/bfd/elf64-ppc.c
++++ b/bfd/elf64-ppc.c
+@@ -4435,10 +4435,6 @@ ppc64_elf_copy_indirect_symbol (struct b
+   edir->elf.ref_regular_nonweak |= eind->elf.ref_regular_nonweak;
+   edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt;
+ 
+-  /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.  */
+-  if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
+-    return;
+-
+   /* Copy over any dynamic relocs we may have on the indirect sym.  */
+   if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL)
+     {
+@@ -4471,6 +4467,16 @@ ppc64_elf_copy_indirect_symbol (struct b
+       eind->dyn_relocs = NULL;
+     }
+ 
++  /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.
++     You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over;  After all,
++     both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just
++     moving reloc accounting around.  However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS 
++     code in ppc64_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for
++     dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the
++     DIR sym here.  */
++  if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
++    return;
++
+   /* Copy over got entries that we may have already seen to the
+      symbol which just became indirect.  */
+   if (eind->elf.got.glist != NULL)